Search found 7 matches
- Sat Sep 30, 2017 12:18 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread
- Replies: 2225
- Views: 529623
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread
It has apparently been claimed that the following innovation is common to the West Germanic languages: Change of /lþ/ to stop /ld/ (except word-finally). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_languages#Linguistic_developments Huh. Good to know. Would be nice if Wikipedia could standardise their so...
- Sat Sep 30, 2017 9:07 am
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread
- Replies: 2225
- Views: 529623
Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread
Could also be analogy from inflected or derived forms with the alternant. Wiktionary actually suggests the entire plural in PGmc was in -d. But actually in this case a better question might be why we reconstruct it with /T/ at all. Given that it's been allegedly independently replaced by the form i...
- Sat Jul 15, 2017 2:19 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Proto-Germanic
- Replies: 9
- Views: 3582
Re: Proto-Germanic
There are some Germanic etymological dictionaries with Proto-Germanic lemmas (at least two fairly recent): Orel, Vladimir (2003) – A handbook of germanic etymology https://archive.org/details/Orel-AHandbookOfGermanicEtymology Kroonen, Guus (2013) – Etymological Dictionary of Proto-Germanic Fick, Fal...
- Sun Mar 05, 2017 1:05 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Two very small questions (North Germanic and Irish)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2393
Re: Two very small questions (North Germanic and Irish)
I think KathTheDragon is correct about the term verba pura . Originally, the term seems to have been used in reference to Greek verb with a vowel before the ending (including before a thematic vowel), which frequently contract. See for example: https://books.google.se/books?id=viYtAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA52#v...
- Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:47 am
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Two small questions about Old Norse hǫfuð and systir
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3432
Re: Two small questions about Old Norse hǫfuð and systir
To try to answer your second question, the PN form <swestar> is difficult to explain.
This is from Martin Syrett (1994) — The Unaccented Vowels of Proto-Norse:
This is from Martin Syrett (1994) — The Unaccented Vowels of Proto-Norse:
- Sun Mar 05, 2017 11:23 am
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Two small questions about Old Norse hǫfuð and systir
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3432
Re: Two small questions about Old Norse hǫfuð and systir
The chronology of vowel loss between PG and Old Norse is thought to have been something like this (we can date the sound changes from inscriptions, but of course, they may not give a complete picture of all the variation in the spoken language): Common germanic syncope (the first centuries AD): In a...
- Sat Mar 04, 2017 12:50 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Two small questions about Old Norse hǫfuð and systir
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3432
Re: Two small questions about Old Norse hǫfuð and systir
1) Given that unstressed /u/ has generally been syncopated by the Old Norse period (e.g. *winuR > vinr ), why does hǫfuð still retain /u/? Syncope after short syllables supposedly happened later than after long syllables, but the related haufuð also retains /u/. According to Wiktionary , this latte...