zompist bboard

It is weird since danish doesn't agree with neither verbs or objects, and I don't know where the influence should come from - that makes me think that there must be a cognitive explanation. Such an explanation might be that plural numbers are somehow more salient. or that I am just stupid. Why? You...

One can call the discussion about the comb an infinite loop. Czech has a common phrase for such trappy situations: začarovaný kruh - "enchanted circle"

Doomsday is a gun in Liero.

Here is my collection of data gathered from various places, including PDF documents about both natlangs and conlangs and some other stuff: http://torrents.thepiratebay.org/3995101/lang_resources.3995101.TPB.torrent (265 MB) All the Zeeblang threads are recorded there too. Also a description of Aymar...

I miss an adjective equivalent of "of course". Czech has an adjective samozřejmý, from which the adverb samozřejmě meaning "of course" is derived. Is it possible say "of course" with nouns in English?

And the Polish one: North - p?lnoc (=midnight) South - poludnie (=midday, noon) East - wsch?d (=[sun]rise) West - zach?d (=[sun]set) :mrgreen: záchod means WC in Czech. It's said "slunce vychází na východě a zachází na záchodě" but that's meant as a joke. The Czech ones: North - sever South - jih E...

I don't understand your request to "contrast" S and T; aren't a(n intransitive)subject and a direct object contrasting anyway? :? Can they both exist in the same sentence as two distinct arguments? Or do they only distinguish some feature (perhaps existence (in the case of theme) or non-existence (...

Maybe just a silly question:
What is the difference between S and T? They are not agent, not patient, just something that in some state or change expressed by the verb. Can you give some examples of them being contrastive?

Some sentences to test your conlang focused on grammar:
http://talideon.com/concultures/wiki/?doc=TestSentences