Search found 24 matches
- Sun Nov 13, 2005 7:51 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: The Official ZBB Quote Thread
- Replies: 2878
- Views: 642753
Except that ( and ) are parentheses. [ and ] are brackets. () ? brackets [] ? square brackets <> ? angle brackets {} ? curly brackets. The only thing I would call a parenthesis is a part of a sentence (such as this) that is enclosed in brackets. But I know this whole thing is a British/American dif...
- Mon May 23, 2005 10:49 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Weird phrases from real languages
- Replies: 323
- Views: 184296
Atatakakatta is Japanese for "was warm"...somehow that's always cracked me up... GOD Hai, it did for me too until I found Atatakakunakatta (It wasn't warm.), or Atatakerebanaranai (It must?/should? have been warm.). I prefer atatakakatta...the best part of it is the lack of any vowels other than /a...
- Sun May 22, 2005 7:21 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Weird phrases from real languages
- Replies: 323
- Views: 184296
- Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:20 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: A Reader's Guide To SOV langs
- Replies: 24
- Views: 14092
- Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:01 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
- Sat Feb 12, 2005 9:29 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
- Sat Feb 12, 2005 7:52 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
Why oh why we don't live in a perfect world?! Why is everyone here so serious?! What's the prob with the mortar pics anyway?! otter ? /'ot@/ mortar ? /'mo:t@/ Just shorten the 'o' and voila: mOTTER.... well, I don't expect to find it funny, I just gave you an explanation why I posted these images. ...
- Fri Feb 11, 2005 8:13 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
- Sat Jan 15, 2005 5:32 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
Re: OTTER
That's the cutest thing I've seen in recent memory!Ruby wrote:Jar Jar Binks wrote:
OTTER
*treasures*
GOD
- Fri Dec 17, 2004 8:50 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
- Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:44 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
- Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:02 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
- Mon Dec 06, 2004 5:29 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
- Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:04 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 407806
Re: OTTER
Very cute!Jar Jar Binks wrote:
OTTER
OTTER + OTTER
GOD
- Sat Jun 19, 2004 2:58 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
My Latin dictionary doesn't give a likely direct prediccessor for fuerza... It gives fortis for 'strong', but as for 'strength', it gives fortit?d?, which wouldn't become 'fuerza', but something like *fuertudo or *huertudo. Indeed, *hortudo or *fortudo woulf be expected, but a google search seems t...
- Sat Jun 19, 2004 12:00 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
I already have that: tj > ts > s / #_, C_ and tj > dz > z > s / V_V (where [s] can also be [T], as in Castillian) According to the sites where I found this, Vulgar Latin <ti> was pronounced as /tj/ That still doesn't quite work though, because that would give tion>/tjon/>/tson/>*/Ton/ instead of /T...
- Sat Jun 19, 2004 11:35 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
I already have that: tj > ts > s / #_, C_ and tj > dz > z > s / V_V (where [s] can also be [T], as in Castillian) According to the sites where I found this, Vulgar Latin <ti> was pronounced as /tj/ That still doesn't quite work though, because that would give tion>/tjon/>/tson/>*/Ton/ instead of /T...
- Sat Jun 19, 2004 8:09 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
- Sat Jun 19, 2004 7:54 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
SOme of those changes are only for a specific dialect. FOr example, /ts dz/ went to /T/ and only then to /s/ in certain dialects. Also, the fate of /L/ varies widely, the most common being /j\/, /j/, and /Z/, though I've also heard of retaining /L/, /dZ/, and even /S/ (though never the /x/ that you ...
- Thu May 06, 2004 5:57 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
- Thu May 06, 2004 5:40 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Correspondence Library
- Replies: 568
- Views: 287522
- Fri Feb 06, 2004 7:21 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The mistakes you've made
- Replies: 115
- Views: 101257
Plus our textbook does mention the allophones and such. We don't go over allophones in my class (by the way, could someone explain what the deal is with "b" and "v"? I think "b" is /b/ and "v" is /B/, but I'm not sure about that). I am in Spanish 1 though, so perhaps we learn that later. do people ...
- Mon Nov 17, 2003 5:47 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Language Universals
- Replies: 61
- Views: 57570
We know with a high degree of certainty that the above wasn't true in the past; e.g., Proto Iroquois had unified morphology and apparently no semantic distinction between nouns and verbs (and it is, in this respect, the template for Noyahtukah). All Iroquois formal nouns are of recent innovation; a...
- Mon Nov 17, 2003 9:44 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Language Universals
- Replies: 61
- Views: 57570
It is true that most "universals" are general patterns and most of them are broken by a very small number of languages. However, there are some that truly are universal, such as all languages having pulmonic consonants (in particular voiceless stops) and I believe front and back vowels. Also, all la...