Search found 128 matches
- Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:04 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Seahorses, I Love 'Em (& other Links of Interest)
- Replies: 2235
- Views: 436039
Obviously. I'm just saying that you can , in principle, separate the story elements from that fact. (Not that I'm saying it's a great story; it has all the faults of the other early Tintins. But I did moderately enjoy picking it up once, whiling away a dull hour with it and putting it back on the sh...
- Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:06 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Seahorses, I Love 'Em (& other Links of Interest)
- Replies: 2235
- Views: 436039
Publishers are rushing to capitalize on the coming frenzy by publishing Tintin books in English, including an unfortunate early apologia for Belgian colonialism (which book Herge later disavowed): Tintin in the Congo. I can see why they'd want to -- it's a mildly fun story if you approach it from a...
- Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:08 pm
- Forum: Conlangery & Conworlds
- Topic: Conlang relay [relocated] (aka "The Cursed Relay")
- Replies: 2538
- Views: 886669
- Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:20 pm
- Forum: Conlangery & Conworlds
- Topic: Conlang relay [relocated] (aka "The Cursed Relay")
- Replies: 2538
- Views: 886669
- Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:18 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Kinterms In Your Conlangs (And Natlangs)
- Replies: 172
- Views: 119217
I'm taking the liberty of re-posting Rodlox's kinship terms into this topic, since his other post is in C&C and will be purged around the beginning of December (unless there are futher replies, in which case it will still be purged eventually.)
Rodlox, if you have any objection to this, shout at me.
Rodlox, if you have any objection to this, shout at me.
- Mon Jul 09, 2007 6:07 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: The Official ZBB Quote Thread
- Replies: 2878
- Views: 640983
- Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:19 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: The Official ZBB Quote Thread
- Replies: 2878
- Views: 640983
- Sun May 27, 2007 1:47 pm
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: The inofficial official RPG-Thread
- Replies: 30
- Views: 10173
- Sat Dec 02, 2006 5:34 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: The Official ZBB Quote Thread
- Replies: 2878
- Views: 640983
- Thu Nov 30, 2006 10:50 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: The Official ZBB Quote Thread
- Replies: 2878
- Views: 640983
- Wed Nov 15, 2006 3:19 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: I wish English had a word for this!
- Replies: 333
- Views: 146642
- Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:53 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: I wish English had a word for this!
- Replies: 333
- Views: 146642
- Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:38 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Lesser-Used Sounds
- Replies: 113
- Views: 87497
I think "both"; saying which is which in each case. Right? No, this topic was original a survey of the sounds people used (and by extension didn't use) in their conlangs. I decided it was worth saving even though it's not directly natlang-related as it does remind us of what sounds used by natlangs...
- Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:49 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: The Official ZBB Quote Thread
- Replies: 2878
- Views: 640983
I love this post for a nice bit of orthographic silliness:
Dingbats wrote:You mean they were all transcribed with <l>, but you changed it to <n>...? Ok....-Klaivas- wrote:I had/have the problem in Ewari of having /l l` L L\/, which used to be <l> but are now <n>.
...this is the main reason why I created a conscript
- Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:16 pm
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: Populations of major Erelaean countries?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 3213
- Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:36 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Morphosyntactic alignment
- Replies: 179
- Views: 128522
- Mon Sep 18, 2006 4:15 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Morphosyntactic alignment
- Replies: 179
- Views: 128522
I've always used [dEk.tI."ki.S@.tIv] but I suppose aI is more logical. Actually, in anglicised Latin and Greek <ae> is pronounced [i:], as in formulae , Caesar , Aesop etc. [aI] is the pedantic pronunciation; I guess the reason I use it is that it's one of those words I've never heard someone else ...
- Sun Sep 17, 2006 4:35 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Morphosyntactic alignment
- Replies: 179
- Views: 128522
- Wed Sep 13, 2006 4:01 am
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: Almean and Terran years
- Replies: 5
- Views: 2963
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 1:55 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: The Lesser-Used Sounds
- Replies: 113
- Views: 87497
My own favorite "exotic" sounds are linguo-labials and lateral plosives. But I don't think I'll use them in my first conlang. Aren't lateral plosives impossible by definition (unless you mean laterally released )? Lateral means there's more airflow round the sides of the tongue than in the centre, ...
- Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:28 am
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: New tattoo ideas! Possibly in Elkarîl!
- Replies: 8
- Views: 3960
- Sun Aug 27, 2006 1:27 am
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: The Almeopedia!
- Replies: 28
- Views: 11322
The redirects are a good idea too (I've put in some already), though that would be low priority for me, and a useful thing readers could do. Oh :oops: I hadn't realised it was set up so other users could edit -- not the sort of thing I'd feel comfortable doing with my conworld! :wink: I wouldn't mi...
- Sat Aug 26, 2006 5:53 am
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: The Almeopedia!
- Replies: 28
- Views: 11322
The resemblance (in appearance, I mean) between Benhêk and Nortala is quite scary...... I hope it wasn't deliberate! :roll: Anyway, I'm enjoying it a lot, but there are two things I really miss, and I think these should be a priority even before adding more articles: * IPA transcriptions, for the ti...
- Thu Jul 27, 2006 12:46 pm
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: The Elenicoi and Naturalisation
- Replies: 18
- Views: 6206
The problem is that this is such a tall order - I'm magically transported X lightdecades away to a planet with a language totally unlike any I've ever encountered before (and don't start with the "it's not that different" spiel, because that's false) and I'm supposed to pick the language up? If I'm...
- Wed Jul 12, 2006 2:07 pm
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: So... who're ewemi?
- Replies: 54
- Views: 19579
Too much in between to qualify as either one or the other, really. (Of the two options open to me, I mean; I'm certainly not a zim .) For one thing, having children one day means too much to me to give it up for anything; but I am rather bookish, and I have the long hair and no beard :P so I'm not 1...