You fuckwit, I wanted you to explicitly say why the ones sano mentioned don't matter/count/exist/whatever merely for being OT; that's something YOU brought up. I will gladly give you some in the NT as soon as you give a meaningful answer.
Terminally stupid.
Search found 51 matches
- Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:55 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: I have a Bible in TOK PISIN: Any Requests...?
- Replies: 68
- Views: 20741
- Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:39 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: I have a Bible in TOK PISIN: Any Requests...?
- Replies: 68
- Views: 20741
Re: I have a Bible in TOK PISIN: Any Requests...?
Goddammit that's not what I was trying to elicit.
- Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:31 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: I have a Bible in TOK PISIN: Any Requests...?
- Replies: 68
- Views: 20741
Re: I have a Bible in TOK PISIN: Any Requests...?
If you would please just read the one word sentence and possibly entertain the thought I was asking why it mattered those were in the Old Testament, it would just make my day.
- Thu Dec 16, 2010 2:20 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: I have a Bible in TOK PISIN: Any Requests...?
- Replies: 68
- Views: 20741
Re: I have a Bible in TOK PISIN: Any Requests...?
Why?Viktor77 wrote:Quote "NEW TESTAMENT."sano wrote:...
Or any other violent and cruel passages you can find.
- Fri Nov 05, 2010 8:54 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
- Replies: 812
- Views: 208342
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I didn't know quackery depended on being intentionally deceitful. I don't think it does!
- Thu Nov 04, 2010 2:39 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: ZBB member photos, part 5. (Something for the weekend, sir?)
- Replies: 5496
- Views: 785626
Re: ZBB member photos, part 5.
Why is there a tag on the sleeve? Is it even a tag?
- Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:50 pm
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: On A Genetic Connection Between Skourene and Wedei
- Replies: 55
- Views: 28943
Re: On A Genetic Connection Between Skourene and Wedei
No, it's pretty terrible, actually.
- Mon Oct 18, 2010 6:02 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Old/Middle English q
- Replies: 14
- Views: 3931
Re: Old/Middle English q
I did not know you were an infinitive.Herra Ratatoskr wrote:According to "The Inflections and Syntax of the Morte d'Arthur," a final -n can be seen on a few anomalous verbs, so I wasn't completely dead by around 1470 (see page 55 of the aforementioned text).
- Sun Oct 17, 2010 11:54 am
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Possible minimal pair between unaspirated and aspirated 't'
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2117
Re: Possible minimal pair between unaspirated and aspirated
So you're saying they could be distinctive but are still the same phoneme. wut
- Sun Sep 19, 2010 10:06 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Hurrian
- Replies: 24
- Views: 5329
- Wed Sep 01, 2010 10:55 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Creativity of the day
- Replies: 1704
- Views: 332731
- Sat Aug 28, 2010 8:07 pm
- Forum: Almea
- Topic: Almean words that look like words in natural languages
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5246
- Wed Aug 25, 2010 10:10 pm
- Forum: C&C Archive
- Topic: [Updated 6/18] Proto-Deithas grammar pdf (you better look)
- Replies: 59
- Views: 13602
- Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:50 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Irrealis Morphology in Montana Salish (or, my senior thesis)
- Replies: 9
- Views: 2451
- Mon Aug 23, 2010 10:20 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Polysynthetic Conlang
- Replies: 638
- Views: 260032
Assumptions and guessing at hidden implications are bad for your health. Do you need a dictionary to learn what * concur * means ? So then I shouldn't assume you're mocking me here, just that you're apparently having some type of problem figuring out how to post. I'll be helpful then really quickly...
- Sun Aug 22, 2010 10:55 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Polysynthetic Conlang
- Replies: 638
- Views: 260032
Do you need a dictionary to learn what * concur * means ? I'm fully aware of the meaning of the word. I'm also fully aware--as are you--that connotation trumps definition. So either you were implying something, which I believe to be the case (based on the only other time I've interacted with you wh...
- Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:55 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Polysynthetic Conlang
- Replies: 638
- Views: 260032
I concur with the notion that it's very silly and indefensible. You know, the post really is silly. I thought the fact that I said twice that it was silly and then the obvious silly nature of the post itself sufficed, but apparently that was too subtle, and it had to be said again, so just to be on...
- Fri Aug 20, 2010 9:51 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Polysynthetic Conlang
- Replies: 638
- Views: 260032
- Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:57 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 410928
- Sat Aug 07, 2010 7:51 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: OTTER
- Replies: 1013
- Views: 410928
- Thu Aug 05, 2010 10:32 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Vowelless words
- Replies: 40
- Views: 31774
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 9:24 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
- Replies: 812
- Views: 208342
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 8:26 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
- Replies: 812
- Views: 208342
- Mon Aug 02, 2010 7:36 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
- Replies: 812
- Views: 208342
- Sun Aug 01, 2010 6:55 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
- Replies: 812
- Views: 208342