Search found 287 matches
- Mon Oct 11, 2010 12:31 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Sources on dechticaetiativity (and applicatives)
- Replies: 3
- Views: 1321
I have "Applicative Constructions" by David Peterson, which discusses this a little: http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Linguistics/TheoreticalDescriptiveLinguistic/?view=usa&ci=9780199270927 I'm not sure I'd recommend that you buy it just to read about alignment issues though, since t...
- Sat Jul 17, 2010 2:26 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: h4 and h5
- Replies: 92
- Views: 40919
That only follos if PIE actually had aspirates. True. I'm not fully convinced of it myself. In fact I lean towards the Breathy Voice Hypothesis. Surely that's not just a hypothesis, but what "voiced aspirates" actually are . A voiced consonant accompanied by a voiceless release is unattested in PIE...
- Fri Jul 16, 2010 1:39 am
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Sound changes in function words
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6220
- Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:10 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Sound changes in function words
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6220
However, British English does sometimes allow the contraction of mainverbal "have" as well, though I'm not clear on the specific restrictions. But things like "I've a new cat" are allowed in at least some British dialects. It's grammatical for me, but sounds formal and slightly old fashioned. On th...
- Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:05 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Palatalization of ejectives
- Replies: 22
- Views: 5835
- Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:11 pm
- Forum: Languages & Linguistics
- Topic: Sound changes in function words
- Replies: 30
- Views: 6220
I'm not sure about sound changes, but I think it's fairly common for frequent words and constructions to be reduced in irregular ways. Very common morphemes tend to be short, and new function words and constructions which aren't are likely to be worn down by changes which aren't general. I guess a g...
- Sun Jul 11, 2010 2:53 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: ZBB 2010 Fieldtrip
- Replies: 27
- Views: 12061
- Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:58 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: resources
- Replies: 722
- Views: 318525
I just found this while googling:
http://www.cicipu.org/papers/gender_and ... course.pdf
I've not read it yet, so I don't know how good/interesting/reputable it is, but the contents page looks pretty interesting at least.
http://www.cicipu.org/papers/gender_and ... course.pdf
I've not read it yet, so I don't know how good/interesting/reputable it is, but the contents page looks pretty interesting at least.
- Wed Jun 09, 2010 3:43 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: LCK Book
- Replies: 282
- Views: 57546
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:27 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
Now for the Hakha Lai examples of applicatives. Hakha Lai has a number of applicatives: -piak benefactive/malefactive -tse?m benefactive -pii comitative -hno? malefactive -ka?n prioritive -taak relinquitive -naak instrumental The object properties which Peterson talks about are as follows: CASE MARK...
- Tue Jun 01, 2010 3:52 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
- Fri May 28, 2010 4:27 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
Tom, following on from your post, I will try to illustrate what I mean. I'm not sure if I explained myself very well, and as I am not an expert when it comes to MAPs I may have misinterpreted something. My point was that there are some applicatives that promote don't always demote the existing objec...
- Thu May 27, 2010 1:14 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
Re: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
Actually, I'm at the University of Michigan, and want to read this article now that I've come across the thread..so, I would be happy to go scan it in. I won't be able to do it for at least three or so days, so if you're willing to wait and it's really there, sure thing! I'd really appreciate it if...
- Thu May 27, 2010 1:12 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
AFAIK (and I've been meaning to quiz my Fillipino friends on this for a while now), all nouns except for the trigger appear in the genitive, regardless of whether they would be core or not in anotehr language. The trigger noun is marked as trigger, and it's role is marked on the verb. Choice of tri...
- Tue May 25, 2010 2:16 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
Re: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
Went to the library today; unfortunately, they don't have that volume (though I did make photocopies of Aubin's PROTO-ALGONQUIAN DICTIONARY and some other goodies you--and/or others--may be interested in). I had a librarian do a search for me--the closest place that has a copy of that book is the U...
- Mon May 24, 2010 11:50 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: resources
- Replies: 722
- Views: 318525
- Sun May 23, 2010 5:30 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
No double-marking. The possessor is on the verb and the noun is elsewhere; simple as that. (The language permits far worse discontinuous 'phrases' than this, too.) But it's uncommon for a Haida clause to have more than one actual noun anywhere in it, and of course lots of nouns in lots of contexts ...
- Sun May 23, 2010 5:26 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
If it is universal, it means that in every language at least some clauses have at least one core argument, which means that in every language at least some clauses have a subject. Clearly some languages don't have any core arguments besides subjects. Although the definition of subject is itself a b...
- Sun May 23, 2010 2:35 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
Re: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
What's the name of the Mithun article? I have a huge PDF library (from JSTOR and photocopies made over the years), and may have it. It's "Understanding and Explaining Applicatives", published by the Chicago Linguistic Society, volume 37 in 2002. I'd really appreciate it if you did have it. I'm 99.9...
- Sun May 23, 2010 11:36 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
Even in English various verbs require PP or other positional/directional complements rather than NP ones, or in addition to them. For instance, you cannot merely put a thing; you have to put it somewhere - omitting the destination information usually produces an unacceptable clause. This sort of th...
- Sun May 23, 2010 6:54 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
- Replies: 24
- Views: 13542
Is the core - oblique distinction universal?
A lot of linguistic literature seems to take a division between core arguments and obliques for granted. But last night, I stumbled onto wondering about whether the distinction is universal while googling on a topic of recent interest - applicatives. In particular, I am still very interested in lang...
- Mon Apr 26, 2010 4:41 pm
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Why doesn't anyone care about the tones in PIE?
- Replies: 18
- Views: 5633
- Sat Feb 27, 2010 11:30 am
- Forum: L&L Museum
- Topic: Predicative Possession
- Replies: 1
- Views: 2772
Predicative Possession
I've just been adding a section to my wiki briefly summarising "Predicative Possession" by Stassen. I thought people might be interested so I posted it here. You can also see it on the wiki: http://www.chrisdb.me.uk/wiki/doku.php?id=possession#typological_correlations_of_possession_schemas For some ...
- Sun Apr 20, 2008 3:35 am
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Seahorses, I Love 'Em (& other Links of Interest)
- Replies: 2235
- Views: 453516
Did she ever think about the fact that if she doesn't have a kid, there potentially won't be anyone to take care of the planet in the future? ...? The planet seemed to take care of itself fine before humans came around and I'm sure it'll be fine when we're gone... :roll: And leaving aside global wa...
- Sat Sep 01, 2007 3:48 pm
- Forum: None of the above
- Topic: Seahorses, I Love 'Em (& other Links of Interest)
- Replies: 2235
- Views: 453516
I know NY Times is giving up their 'exclusive content' shit, but this login is still annoying. Understandable, but annoying. Oh, sorry, I didn't realize it needed a login. Maybe someone could post a link that doesn't? It didn't ask me to log in, and I don't have an account with the NY Times, so it'...