zompist bboard

THIS IS AN ARCHIVE ONLY - see Ephemera
It is currently Fri Dec 06, 2019 4:03 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 639 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2003 12:13 am 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
The Navaho name for Albuquerque is "The place where the railroad trains make that noise" ... or something close to that, anyway ... an Albuquerque resident who learned some Navaho told me this.

_________________
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2003 6:48 pm 
Mercator wrote:
The Navaho name for Albuquerque is "The place where the railroad trains make that noise" ... or something close to that, anyway ... an Albuquerque resident who learned some Navaho told me this.


Cheyenne and Mohawk offer some equally descriptive place names.

It's amazing how widespread this kind of thing is in American languages, even among languages that have no genetic relation whatsoever.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 9:25 am 
I guess that naming objects by their actions allows you to bring in a lot more of culture's personality than a normal nouns-and-verbs-are-seperate-things language.

For a start, the descriptions they choose could demonstrate their priorities - is everything in terms of food, of religion, or maybe of society? A culture may base a lot of its descriptions around history/mythology, perhaps.*

Also, it can demonstrate the irony/pessimism/optimism present in a culture. I think it would be fun to have a fatalistic culture that uses names like the ones Jaaa suggested.... "car" could be "is-going-to-crash", and "hamster" could be "gets-squashed-easily".

*You know those cultures where the language changes incredibly quickly through borrowing because it is taboo to use a word that sounds like the name of a dead person? Maybe a culture could have the opposite: things are named in relation to the recently deceased - "orange" could be "johnsmith-liked-it", "bookcase" could be "johnsmith-habitually-tried-to-make-it-but-always-failed".












How fixed are these words? If you used a word based on an alternative description of the same thing, would people understand you? If so, it would be useful for poetry.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:46 pm 
Salmoneus wrote:
How fixed are these words? If you used a word based on an alternative description of the same thing, would people understand you? If so, it would be useful for poetry.


They're fixed in the sense that they're time stable; but a thing can have many names. The Blackfoot have (I'm told) five different descriptive names for the atlatl, some older and some newer, some used more often than others. You can give a new name to a thing on the spot, as long as the referent is clear.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:49 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
Can one name be used for more than one thing?

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:51 pm 
Eddy the Great wrote:
Can one name be used for more than one thing?


Sure. Usually referents named by a single word are related in some way, though; see my example in the intro to the Noyahtukah grammar.


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 1:55 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
Quote:
Sure. Usually referents named by a single word are related in some way, though; see my example in the intro to the Noyahtukah grammar.


How might they be related? Function?

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 2:10 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
Sal wrote:
Maybe a culture could have the opposite: things are named in relation to the recently deceased - "orange" could be "johnsmith-liked-it", "bookcase" could be "johnsmith-habitually-tried-to-make-it-but-always-failed".

I've done this in Xap, although words like these are a small subset of the total vocabulary, and it is all done with nouns rather than verbs. Examples are halapatu = Hala's communication device = cellphone; lilihuputi = Lilihu's toy = a certain type of foam bath toys; kutucaxi = Kutu's idea = pacifism.
If these were indefinite phrases rather than definites the two words would have to be separated by the linking particle la.


I like the idea of having alternative words for the same thing. Old English poetry used metaphors a lot, so for example they would rarely or never use the actual word for "sea", they would use metaphors like "the whales' road", etc., and they would use many different metaphors for the same thing.

_________________
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 2:46 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:13 pm
Posts: 356
Location: im itësin
Eddy the Great wrote:
What do you think would be a good way to express these words with verbal phrases?

cat


I enjoy Glenn's "hunts-small-squeaking-things" but I could also suggest "burries-excrement-in-sand" or "cleans-self-vainly," perhaps also "believes-she-is-ruling-us-all." This is a concept of polisynthetic languages I enjoy, is that you describe what you're talking about rather than just outright naming it. So you could indeed have many words for one thing, as aposed to English where 'cat' is just plain ol' cat (or worthless-shedding-shit-machine, if you want to be so vulgar).

Quote:
dog


"accompanies-us-hunting," "enemy-of-the-(insert cat descriptor here)," "shows-loyalty," "begs-shamelessly," etc.

Quote:
chair


I really like "breaks-when-I-sit-on-it," but you could also go "isn't-comfortable-despite-what-he-says," or perhaps "my-wife-chose-it," "painted-with-duck-motif," "beer-was-split-here" :D

Quote:
road


An unusual one is 'goes-ever-on-and-on," but perhaps more realistically "scars-the-earth-in-all-places." :|

Quote:
fan/air conditioner

"keeps-us-cold-while-poisoning-the-sky," or "blows-cold-air"

Quote:
car/truck(should there be separate words?)


They should be--since there's the obvious divide between functions. If you're riding in one, a car can be "carries-us-noisily," a truck "carries-greatly-burning," and a muscle car "gets-me-the-girls" :mrgreen:

For city names, I'd suggest good descriptors which breath some history on it, it sounds Entish, but it's still good--the "they-fought-nine-nights" and "the-stars-light-our-battle," but also "we-make-peace" (the UN building), "shines-like-sky-but-they-steal-our-money" (Las Vegas), "nothing-ever-happens" (where I live), and so forth.

_________________
KneeQuickie | Proto-Deithas Reference Grammar


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 4:38 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
I like your suggestions.

Do they prefer to keep the descriptive name one word? Can it be multiple words?

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:04 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:13 pm
Posts: 356
Location: im itësin
If by multiple words, you mean like the various ones I listed for cat? Pragmatically, the most concise description will be used most often, but that isn't enough to coin new words (as it were). I know a guy who forgot what the word "clothes pin" so he coined "spring-loaded laundry suspension device." :D I now use it in place of clothes pin.

For a better example, say you come across something new. Something so unusual that you can't relate to it with any word you already know. The only best way to name it (aside thingamajig, doohickey, and those words) is to describe it, and give people enough help to understand what you're saying. So the idea is you have nothing to fall back on, so you just a good descriptor. And if there's a better, more concise one, then voila, you now have a better word, but that doesn't mean the old coinage goes away. To bring up Edo Nyland, the biggest joke to ever hit historical linguistics, does a great job of this in his poppycockamany Basque-derivations (Latin, 'you-memorize-it' gave me a chuckle).

This sort of practice, I guess, would be more than well enough to for Sapir-Whorf's hypothesis, that grammar influences thought. The idea that everything is described moreso than named is a good hint at how the people think and see the world.

_________________
KneeQuickie | Proto-Deithas Reference Grammar


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:16 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
I have to wonder if using verbs this way would make sentences really long. Then again, how much longer could a descriptive name for antidisestablishmentarianism be than the English word?

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:19 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
It depends if you allow homophones in the verbs that make up the larger words. If "ati" can be allowed to be used for memorize, L and N could be the head markers, and there you go. Or just do it Edo's way and only use the first few letters of the word.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:29 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
Basque has head-marking?

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:40 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
No, I was just giving an example of how words could be compressed, and I know of at least one polysynthetic language family (Eskimo-Aleut) that does use compression to shorten out the length of its derived words. An example is the word "uitsatai", meaning allegedly "those by which he keeps gazing". Another example is "nalunaerassuarmetaut", not exactly short, but Eskimo is spoken pretty quickly ... it means telegraph, and that breaks down as "that by which one habitually makes something not be ignored in a hurry" (coined before telephones existed).


and lets not forget Lojban ... it was evidently designed by people who admired polysynthetism, and in some ways could be classified as polysynthetic, although in a very alien way.

_________________
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image


Last edited by Soap on Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:41 pm 
Lebom
Lebom
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:51 am
Posts: 192
Location: Ann Arbor
Eddy the Great wrote:
Basque has head-marking?


Yeah:
saldu d-izki-e-t
sell(perf) it(abs)-ROOT-them(dat)-I(erg)
I've sold it to them

Edit: I guess this turned out to be irrelevant, but it does have it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:48 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
Actually I didnt know Basque could do that, so you taught me that. Also I forgot to mention that uitsatai is the East Greenlandic word for "eyes". So in other words, they put a lot more meaning than necessary into their words, but they compress it using complicated sound rules, so the actual words arent uncomfortably long. Sorry I dont have the actual rules on hand, so I cant say what the components of those words are.

_________________
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:53 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
So sound compression rules help, but speaking quickly is your best bet.

Basque seems to mark a nearby word. I had an idea for a language based on head marking a word devoted simply to head marking.

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:59 pm 
Lebom
Lebom
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 1:51 am
Posts: 192
Location: Ann Arbor
Eddy the Great wrote:
Basque seems to mark a nearby word. I had an idea for a language based on head marking a word devoted simply to head marking.


That's the auxiliary; almost all Basque verbs inflect periphrastically like that, with the main verb only changing for aspect. There are a very few older synthetic forms, e.g. genekarretzan "we brought them".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 7:59 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:13 pm
Posts: 356
Location: im itësin
What do you mean? Like each syntactical position is irrevelant to meaning, but, say in the 2nd, regardless what is put in that syntactical position, is headmarked? or something else?

_________________
KneeQuickie | Proto-Deithas Reference Grammar


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 8:02 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
Nikolai wrote:
What do you mean? Like each syntactical position is irrevelant to meaning, but, say in the 2nd, regardless what is put in that syntactical position, is headmarked? or something else?
Lots of Australian langs do that. I dont think Basque does it, but it does exist in Australia.

_________________
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2003 9:51 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:13 pm
Posts: 356
Location: im itësin
I would think a poly-lang, written with logographs, would just use the constituing elements of its name. Consider Classical Nahuatl (something of a polylang) wrote 'Quetzacoatl' as a feathered snake, despite that he wasn't (and later personified as one by the Spaniards, who couldn't understand that's just how it's written.)

[Edit] Did Eddy's post on how polylang's would be written in logographic scripts just disappear?

_________________
KneeQuickie | Proto-Deithas Reference Grammar


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 9:16 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
I remember hearing something about Navaho not allowing certain things to subjects or objects or something. I had an interesting idea along those lines: a Terp (the name of one) cannot be the object of a sentence since that could be seen as viewing them as passive.

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:09 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
If you had a polysynthetic conlang that defined some words as sentences with a specific subject, you could make a language that is much more powerful at forcing people to think in a certain way. So if the word for "marriage" means something like "a man couples with a woman" then it would both exclude gays and put the man in a dominant position. I use this system, but only for a poetic effect ... the everyday words mostly aren't built that way.

_________________
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:32 pm 
N'guny
N'guny
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2002 4:23 am
Posts: 91
Mercator wrote:
If you had a polysynthetic conlang that defined some words as sentences with a specific subject, you could make a language that is much more powerful at forcing people to think in a certain way. So if the word for "marriage" means something like "a man couples with a woman" then it would both exclude gays and put the man in a dominant position. I use this system, but only for a poetic effect ... the everyday words mostly aren't built that way.


Probably well over half of Mohawk nouns are done that way; it gives the language an incredible natural poetry. But you could never force thinking on militant Mohawks that way--they'd just make up a new word; they do it all the time; the language is very open-ended that way.

But, interestingly, traditional Iroquoian culture seems to have been more tolerant of homosexuality among young men than other Indian cultures. You were still expected to get married and have children, but you could carry on a relationship with another man well into adulthood. It certainly wasn't encouraged, but was tolerated within certain limits.

_________________
"On that island lies the flesh and bone of the Great Charging Bear, for as long as the grass grows and water runs," he said. "Where his spirit dwells, no one can say."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 639 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group