A Brief History of Grammar

The best topics from Languages & Linguistics, kept on a permanent basis.
Post Reply
User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

A Brief History of Grammar

Post by psygnisfive »

I've gotten bored and I'm in one of my "teaching" moods, so I've decided that I'm going to write up a series of blog posts the trace the history of generative grammar. For each one I'm going to outline the core elements of the theory and look at how the theory works on a few basic, but I think exemplary, sentences, to give you an idea how the theories differ in their approach to the same problem.

If anyone's interested, I'll be posting on my blog, starting here: A Brief History of Grammar.
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Ok, first part is up. Long and somewhat dense, but useful for the rest.

A Brief History of Grammar - Structural Linguistics and Formal Languages
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
Noriega
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 7:41 am
Location: Skaane

Post by Noriega »

Thank you for this initiative. I’m just now reading about linguistics in the 19th century (roots, roots, roots!), but so far I’m less familiar with the modern developments.

Can you recommend any books on the history of grammar studying in the 20th century?
Perhaps eventually all languages will evolve so that they include some clicks among their consonants – Peter Ladefoged

Jahai: /kpotkpɛt/ ‘the feeling of waking up to the sound of munching’

User avatar
Radagast
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Radagast »

Pieter Seuren: Western Linguistics. That was the text book when I took a course on linguistic theories of the twentieth century five years ago.
[i]D'abord on ne parla qu'en poésie ; on ne s'avisa de raisonner que long-temps après.[/i] J. J. Rousseau, Sur l'origine des langues. 1783

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Part 2 is up: A Brief History of Grammar - Transformational Grammar (TG)

Noriega: Sorry for not replying sooner. I would suggest you take a look at Carnie's Syntax: A Generative Introduction (which uses the Principles and Parameters/Government and Binding framework), and Adger's Core Syntax (which uses the Minimalist Program framework), if you're interested in contemporary Chomskyan theories. The former also has a chapter briefly introducing LFG, and another briefly introducing HPSG.[/url]
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Part the 5th!

A Brief History of Grammar - Revised Extended Standard Theory (REST)

Now with even more words in the name of the theory! :)

Enjoy?
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
Rik
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: London, UK
Contact:

Post by Rik »

I'm enjoying these posts. Thank you!

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Well I'm glad someone is. :p
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
baraka
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 30
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 10:34 pm
Location: United Queendom

Post by baraka »

This is very helpful indeed. Thanks!

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Radagast wrote:Pieter Seuren: Western Linguistics. That was the text book when I took a course on linguistic theories of the twentieth century five years ago.
This is stupidly late, but this book seems to be stuck in the 1960s in terms of formal grammars. It seems to only mention TGG, which is no longer used by anyone, nevermind that its direct descendant(s) aren't the only things around today.
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
Radagast
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 97
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 9:46 am
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Radagast »

Well it doesn't go any later than Generative Semantics. So it does stip around the mid seventies.
[i]D'abord on ne parla qu'en poésie ; on ne s'avisa de raisonner que long-temps après.[/i] J. J. Rousseau, Sur l'origine des langues. 1783

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Part 7, Minimalist Program is now up. Of all the core Chomskyan theories, this is the one to understand.
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Part 8 - Generative Semantics (GS)

If you're still reading. ;)
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

New part, a week late:

Tree-adjoining Grammar

After this we get into the more heavy hitting models that have very complicated structures, so if you're need to, brush up on the formal grammar stuff from earlier, it'll be helpful.
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
Space Dracula
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:10 pm
Location: Austin fuckin Texas
Contact:

Post by Space Dracula »

we've had huge arguments over this before but

that title's sort of inaccurate

you should instead say "Generative Grammar" there, because otherwise you're implying that you're writing about the development of grammar as a component of language

which is both misleading, and in my snot-nosed opinion representative of the how far up its own ass generative linguistics is
<Dudicon> i would but you're too fat to fit in my mouth!!

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

Space Dracula wrote:we've had huge arguments over this before but

that title's sort of inaccurate

you should instead say "Generative Grammar" there, because otherwise you're implying that you're writing about the development of grammar as a component of language

which is both misleading, and in my snot-nosed opinion representative of the how far up its own ass generative linguistics is
It's a play on the book title "A Brief History of Time", which isn't exactly just, or even primarily about time. The point of the series of posts was made in the introductory post, and if you're reading the series without reading the introductory post, you're doing it wrong. And if you do read the introductory post, there's no confusion.

So in short, shove it. :P
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Post by psygnisfive »

LFG is up: Lexical-Functional Grammar

If you really believe in the existence of purely grammatical functions like subject and object, LFG is probably more your kind of framework.
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
Delthayre
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 222
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 8:47 am

Syntax is hard, mang!

Post by Delthayre »

Lexical-Functional Grammar is my framework becaue I was never taught anything else, of course I never really understood it well, especially the functional structure that so distinguishes it.
psygnisfive wrote:
Space Dracula wrote:we've had huge arguments over this before but

that title's sort of inaccurate

you should instead say "Generative Grammar" there, because otherwise you're implying that you're writing about the development of grammar as a component of language

which is both misleading, and in my snot-nosed opinion representative of the how far up its own ass generative linguistics is
It's a play on the book title "A Brief History of Time", which isn't exactly just, or even primarily about time. The point of the series of posts was made in the introductory post, and if you're reading the series without reading the introductory post, you're doing it wrong. And if you do read the introductory post, there's no confusion.

So in short, shove it. :P
I thought that the title was meant to to lightly comic or teasting. I suppose a better title might have been: Mister Psygnisfive, His Notes Upon the History of Theories Created by Linguists in Furtherance of their Field, Which Concerns Foremost the Generative Theories That Allege to Describe Generally the Structure of Languages, All Throug a Weblog That Inexplicably Contains a Reference to Earth: Final Conflict, Which Presumably the Author Will Concede Was Always Inconsistent and Went Completely Wrong By the Final Season, For the Glory of God and the Fellation of His Majesty the King, May God Save Him, Amen.

Is that better, Spacey?
"Great men are almost always bad men."
~Lord John Dalberg Acton

User avatar
psygnisfive
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: College Park, MD; Fort Lauderdale, FL
Contact:

Re: Syntax is hard, mang!

Post by psygnisfive »

My god! The 12 part! GPSG! ::dies:

This is probably the most acceptable sort of theory for people here. It's pretty much just a formalization of things like agreement and "extraction" in a way that sounds a lot like how we normally talk (so and so agrees with blah dee blah ~> agreement features of so and so must equal agreement features of blah dee blah).

http://www.wellnowwhat.net/blog/?p=349
Delthayre wrote:Lexical-Functional Grammar is my framework becaue I was never taught anything else, of course I never really understood it well, especially the functional structure that so distinguishes it.
psygnisfive wrote:
Space Dracula wrote:we've had huge arguments over this before but

that title's sort of inaccurate

you should instead say "Generative Grammar" there, because otherwise you're implying that you're writing about the development of grammar as a component of language

which is both misleading, and in my snot-nosed opinion representative of the how far up its own ass generative linguistics is
It's a play on the book title "A Brief History of Time", which isn't exactly just, or even primarily about time. The point of the series of posts was made in the introductory post, and if you're reading the series without reading the introductory post, you're doing it wrong. And if you do read the introductory post, there's no confusion.

So in short, shove it. :P
I thought that the title was meant to to lightly comic or teasting. I suppose a better title might have been: Mister Psygnisfive, His Notes Upon the History of Theories Created by Linguists in Furtherance of their Field, Which Concerns Foremost the Generative Theories That Allege to Describe Generally the Structure of Languages, All Throug a Weblog That Inexplicably Contains a Reference to Earth: Final Conflict, Which Presumably the Author Will Concede Was Always Inconsistent and Went Completely Wrong By the Final Season, For the Glory of God and the Fellation of His Majesty the King, May God Save Him, Amen.

Is that better, Spacey?
Delthayre gets a (late and by now surely stale) cookie for getting the reference. BTW, I do not accept the existence of Seasons 2-5 of EFC. Season 1 is the best season, and after that they just went off the deep end.
[img]http://wellnowwhat.net/male_gay.png[/img]

"We haven't thought that about grammars in 34 YEARS! Get with the times! If you need a ride, we'll give you one, just ask!" - Richard Larson, to Daniel Everett

User avatar
Tarasoriku
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: NYC

Post by Tarasoriku »

Psygnis, these are great overviews, and I've really learned a lot. Your time and input is appreciated and you are a true scholar among braying hyenas.

but just finish il database, omfg
[quote="Pthug"]oh shit you just called black people in britain "african-americans"
my
god[/quote]

Post Reply