zompist bboard

THIS IS AN ARCHIVE ONLY - see Ephemera
It is currently Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:06 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 150 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 20, 2006 7:11 pm 
Lebom
Lebom
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 10:38 am
Posts: 96
Location: Tkaronto
hwhatting wrote:
Arunas wrote:

Anyway, I've got some info on Nepālī. I don't think I can type in Devanagārī, so bear with me.


Nice tidbits, but they're not exactly "from beyond IE":

http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=nep

Best regards,

Hans-Werner


I know that Nepālī as a language isn't, but the tidbits are definitely beyond the scope of what most people think of as "IE".

_________________
agus tha mo chluasan eòlach air a’ mhac-talla fhathast / às dèidh dhomh dùsgadh
(mona nicleòid wagner, “fo shneachd”)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 4:25 am 
Smeric
Smeric

Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2002 2:49 am
Posts: 2316
Location: Bonn, Germany
Arunas wrote:
I know that Nepālī as a language isn't, but the tidbits are definitely beyond the scope of what most people think of as "IE".


Maybe we should move this to a thread "Fun features of IE languages"?
There is certainly a lot more like this out there - stuff most people would be surprised to find in IE languages, especially people who just have a cursory knowledge of a few European IE languags like English or Spanish (e.g., the split ergative system of some Iranian languages I mentioned in a previous post in this thread, the incipient tone systems of Norwegian or Serbo-Croatian, etc.).
Best regards,

Hans-Werner


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IE
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 8:21 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:25 pm
Posts: 409
[quote="Ran"]No IE language, afaik, has any trace of tones.[/quote]
The search isn't turning up anything, so I'll just go ahead and say it: Isn't Punjabi a tonal language? I'm pretty sure it has three phonemically distinguished tones: high, mid and low.

PS. Okay, technical problem #1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IE
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:13 pm 
Smeric
Smeric

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:46 am
Posts: 1035
Location: Réunion
[quote="rotting ham"][quote="Ran"]No IE language, afaik, has any trace of tones.[/quote]
The search isn't turning up anything, so I'll just go ahead and say it: Isn't Punjabi a tonal language? I'm pretty sure it has three phonemically distinguished tones: high, mid and low.

PS. Okay, technical problem #1.[/quote]Yeah I'm sure there's tone there too. And it says so in the book 'The Indo-Aryan Languages' by Colin P. Masica, which is in front of me here. In fact, it says (page 118): Contrastive tone is reported from several NIA languages and dialects, among them Chittagong and Dacca Bengali, Shina, Khowar, Gawarbati, Bashkarik, "Lahnda", Rajasthani, Dogri, several West Pahari dialects (Kochi, Shodochi, Bishshau, Rudhari, Khashali), and possibly Wotapuri, but undoubtedly the classic case of tone in NIA is Punjabi. There are two distinctive tones in Punjabi contrasting with the neutral tone: the High (or High-Falling /`/ and the Low (or Low-Rising) /´/. (Some would say there are three tones, including the neutral or "Mid" tone as one of them.)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 9:41 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 12:25 pm
Posts: 409
Thanks, and apologies for resurrecting a thread four years after it expired for something regulars already know by now, I'm sure. (only for the L&L Museum, and only because the word Punjabi, Oikoumene's Čia-Ša, doesn't occur once in the whole forum according to the search function) This is how the tones are represented orthographically: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurmukh%C4%AB_script

PS. Wait a minute, the Čia-Ša languages aren't tonal? I had an Eddyimpression that they were. Huh, just isolating.

P2S. I can't believe there isn't a single tonal Eastern language, the closest being Cuezi, which is only pitch-accented. Oh well, at least Lufaša is largely monosyllabic. That's one divergence Oikoumene hasn't produced to my knowledge. It looked tonal to me because of all these accents over the vowels like bák, chàn, nük, etc, but there's no reference to tones anywhere.


Last edited by rotting bones on Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:15 am 
Avisaru
Avisaru
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 4:56 pm
Posts: 690
Location: Gimaamaa onibaaganing
Man what is up with none of the BBCode working in this forum? It's pissing me off. >:|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IE
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 8:28 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 807
rotting ham wrote:
Ran wrote:
No IE language, afaik, has any trace of tones.

The search isn't turning up anything, so I'll just go ahead and say it: Isn't Punjabi a tonal language?
Wasn't Classical Greek supposed to have been tonal?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IE
PostPosted: Sat Oct 30, 2010 4:09 pm 
Smeric
Smeric

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:46 am
Posts: 1035
Location: Réunion
TomHChappell wrote:
rotting ham wrote:
Ran wrote:
No IE language, afaik, has any trace of tones.

The search isn't turning up anything, so I'll just go ahead and say it: Isn't Punjabi a tonal language?
Wasn't Classical Greek supposed to have been tonal?
IIRC it's not quite, actually pitch accent. Says so here for example.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IE
PostPosted: Sun Oct 31, 2010 3:06 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Posts: 557
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA
jmcd wrote:
TomHChappell wrote:
rotting ham wrote:
Ran wrote:
No IE language, afaik, has any trace of tones.

The search isn't turning up anything, so I'll just go ahead and say it: Isn't Punjabi a tonal language?
Wasn't Classical Greek supposed to have been tonal?
IIRC it's not quite, actually pitch accent. Says so here for example.
Something inheirited from late PIE. Early (Vedic) Sanskrit also had a pitch accent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:02 pm 
Lebom
Lebom
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 6:04 pm
Posts: 157
Location: NorCal
Also some (south?) Slavic languages IIRC.

_________________
Jar Jar Binks wrote:
Now, by making just a few small changes, we prettify the orthography for happier socialist tomorrow!
Xonen wrote:
^ WHS. Except for the log thing and the Andean panpipers.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:28 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Posts: 1228
Location: Scattered disc
I think what Ran may have been getting at is that none of the IE languages that have tones today inherited them from PIE ,even in a much-changed form. They all went through stages in which they were completely toneless and then re-developed tones in various ways. I don't think everyone agrees with this, though; I remember reading on this board somewhere that there are at least some people who believe that the tones of Latvian and Lithuanian do in fact trace back directly to PIE. Even so, it's nearly certain than Punjabi and the Slavic languages' tones are innovations and not inherited from Sanskrit/Proto-Slavic.

_________________
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 9:15 am 
Lebom
Lebom

Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:26 am
Posts: 136
Location: Oklahoma
Soap wrote:
I think what Ran may have been getting at is that none of the IE languages that have tones today inherited them from PIE ,even in a much-changed form. They all went through stages in which they were completely toneless and then re-developed tones in various ways.


I think that must be the case, because if I remember correctly, Swedish has tones (at least in some dialects), at the Flemish dialect (or sister-language, depending on one's argument) Limburgish, has tones. Both of these are, obviously IE (being Germanic).

_________________
Xephyr wrote:
Kitties: little happy factories.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:57 am 
Avisaru
Avisaru
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 24, 2003 2:40 pm
Posts: 491
Location: Maryland
Soap wrote:
Even so, it's nearly certain than Punjabi and the Slavic languages' tones are innovations and not inherited from Sanskrit/Proto-Slavic.



Nitpick: Slavic languages' tonal/pitch systems were in fact inherited from Proto-Slavic; however, Proto-Slavic did not inherit its system from PIE.

_________________
http://www.veche.net/
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:16 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:21 pm
Posts: 894
Location: Ohio
Apparently, Melpa has a binary counting system.

_________________
(Avatar via Happy Wheels Wiki)
Index Diachronica PDF v.10.2
Conworld megathread

AVDIO · VIDEO · DISCO


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:21 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru

Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Posts: 807
Rorschach wrote:
Apparently, Melpa has a binary counting system.

What's their word for "toast"?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 5:53 am 
Smeric
Smeric

Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2002 2:49 am
Posts: 2316
Location: Bonn, Germany
Rorschach wrote:
Apparently, Melpa has a binary counting system.

wikipedia wrote:
1
tenda
"one"

2
ragl
"two"

3
ragltika
"twone"

4
tembokak
"four"

5
pömp tsi gudl
"one past four"

6
pömp ragl gudl
"two past four"

7
pömp ragltika gudl
"twone past four"

8
engak
"eight"

9
pömp tsi pip
"one past eight"

10
pömp ragl pip
"two past eight"


Interesting that they use different, seemingly unrelated forms for the dyades when they are alone and when they are in composed numbers (4 alone is "tembokak", in composed numbers it's "gudl", 8 alone is "engak", in composed numbers it's "pip").

@ Tom: Gah! It took me twenty minutes to get your awful pun. :roll: :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2011 9:47 pm 
Sumerul
Sumerul
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Posts: 3600
Location: Tokyo
I don't buy it... they haven't given us enough information to determine what happens past 10. Is 8+7 "pömp pömp ragltika gudl pip"? Because I doubt it – that'll get very confusing very quickly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Nov 12, 2011 7:04 am 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
Posts: 1088
Location: In this multiverse or another
finlay wrote:
I don't buy it... they haven't given us enough information to determine what happens past 10. Is 8+7 "pömp pömp ragltika gudl pip"? Because I doubt it – that'll get very confusing very quickly.


pömp pömp ragltika gudl pip gudl pip pömp pömp ragltika gudl pip....
It sure can

_________________
sano wrote:
To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:01 pm 
Avisaru
Avisaru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 10:59 pm
Posts: 575
Location: Seoul
rotting bones wrote:
PS. Wait a minute, the Čia-Ša languages aren't tonal? I had an Eddyimpression that they were. Huh, just isolating.

They were. But Zomp did a major overhaul a year or two ago on the Cia Shia languages.

_________________
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IE
PostPosted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 2:14 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Posts: 1138
Location: The vendée of America
jmcd wrote:
TomHChappell wrote:
rotting ham wrote:
Ran wrote:
No IE language, afaik, has any trace of tones.

The search isn't turning up anything, so I'll just go ahead and say it: Isn't Punjabi a tonal language?
Wasn't Classical Greek supposed to have been tonal?
IIRC it's not quite, actually pitch accent. Says so here for example.


Damn, my computer can't handle .ram files for some reason.

_________________
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 3:43 am 
Smeric
Smeric

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:46 am
Posts: 1035
Location: Réunion
Maybe try downloading real player then.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 2:32 pm 
Sumerul
Sumerul
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Posts: 4545
Location: the Imperial Corridor
jmcd wrote:
Maybe try downloading real player then.

No, don't do that. RealPlayer is terrible and evil.

Can VLC play .ram files?

_________________
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 12:11 am 
Avisaru
Avisaru
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2004 10:59 pm
Posts: 575
Location: Seoul
Nortaneous wrote:
jmcd wrote:
Maybe try downloading real player then.

No, don't do that. RealPlayer is terrible and evil.

Can VLC play .ram files?

I'm pretty sure VLC could play the sounds captured by putting ring patterns on ancient pottery.

_________________
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:21 am 
Sumerul
Sumerul
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Posts: 3600
Location: Tokyo
Nortaneous wrote:
jmcd wrote:
Maybe try downloading real player then.

No, don't do that. RealPlayer is terrible and evil.

Can VLC play .ram files?

Last time I checked, it was one of the few formats it can't play, for some reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 23, 2012 12:07 pm 
Smeric
Smeric
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Posts: 1652
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
finlay wrote:
Nortaneous wrote:
jmcd wrote:
Maybe try downloading real player then.

No, don't do that. RealPlayer is terrible and evil.

Can VLC play .ram files?

Last time I checked, it was one of the few formats it can't play, for some reason.


That reason being Real won't release the codec.

_________________
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 150 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group