The Almean Human Psyche
-
- Niš
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2003 9:10 pm
The Almean Human Psyche
Since the Humans on Almea are somewhat different then Humans inhabiting Earth, I ws wondering; Do Almean Humans have a different psychology? I mean are there any intresting quirks in the A.Human psyche that you know of? Or haven't you been that involved with them.
There's two I'm aware of.
1. For evolutionary reasons, Almean humans have a thing for water. If at all possible, they live near the water and bathe every day. They don't tolerate very dry climates well (these areas are therefore either empty, or inhabited by elcari).
2. They're a little nicer than terrestrial humans. They can be plenty nasty, but they don't have quite the depths of vicious cruelty that our species does.
1. For evolutionary reasons, Almean humans have a thing for water. If at all possible, they live near the water and bathe every day. They don't tolerate very dry climates well (these areas are therefore either empty, or inhabited by elcari).
2. They're a little nicer than terrestrial humans. They can be plenty nasty, but they don't have quite the depths of vicious cruelty that our species does.
Hmm, so what sort of things that have happened on Earth would be impossible to think of on Almea? The Holocaust? That experiment with the teacher and the "pupil", showing what even ordinary people can do if they're allowed to?zompist wrote:2. They're a little nicer than terrestrial humans. They can be plenty nasty, but they don't have quite the depths of vicious cruelty that our species does.
-Pthag of Sandelfon
I'm not sure the difference between genocide and ordinary thuggishness is in the psychology of the perpetrators, though — more their degree of organization.zompist wrote:Yeah, the Holocaust is a good example. The reason is more or less literary: I'd consider it a little creepy to make up something as evil as genocide in order to excite the reader's indignation.
I've always wondered about that. Do they have narrower feet than we do? Or wider toes? Or bigger gaps in between?zompist wrote:Almean hominids have four toes, though I don't know how that would affect their psychology.
[url=http://nakedcelt.zoomshare.com/files/index.html]The Naked Celt[/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
I'm not sure, mostly because I don't know to what extent the width of our feet is accident, and how much it's needed for balance. Assuming it's a little of both, I'd say the toes are wider but the foot is a bit narrower.NakedCelt wrote:I've always wondered about that. Do they have narrower feet than we do? Or wider toes? Or bigger gaps in between?zompist wrote:Almean hominids have four toes, though I don't know how that would affect their psychology.
Hmmm... that doesn't seem to fit in with their aquatic origin, though...zompist wrote:I'm not sure, mostly because I don't know to what extent the width of our feet is accident, and how much it's needed for balance. Assuming it's a little of both, I'd say the toes are wider but the foot is a bit narrower.NakedCelt wrote:I've always wondered about that. Do they have narrower feet than we do? Or wider toes? Or bigger gaps in between?zompist wrote:Almean hominids have four toes, though I don't know how that would affect their psychology.
[url=http://nakedcelt.zoomshare.com/files/index.html]The Naked Celt[/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
[url=http://gyro.opsa.org.nz/][i]Gyro[/i][/url]
With all this foot discussion, I feel like I?m blundered into George DuMaurier?s novel Trilby!zompist wrote:Ah, good point. OK, cancel that order for narrower feet.
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwa ... rilby.html
One of the reasons why Trilby was such an exciting person is that she walked around in bare feet, or she was once bare-footed, or something like that. It?s been years since I read the novel.
So, what are the attitudes towards bare feet in the Almean cultures?
Huh! I just never knew that Svengali was a fictional character. Educational, this board is.Shm Jay wrote:With all this foot discussion, I feel like I?m blundered into George DuMaurier?s novel Trilby!
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwa ... rilby.html
Hmm. I doubt that Almea would be all that gratifying for a foot fetishist. In a pre-modern world, going barefoot would largely mean having really filthy feet. (Think for a moment about the implications of the principal form of transportation being the horse.) It would be common enough, but mostly associated with being poor (or a child-- you don't have to be dirt poor to be unhappy about keeping a large family of growing children in shoes).One of the reasons why Trilby was such an exciting person is that she walked around in bare feet, or she was once bare-footed, or something like that. It?s been years since I read the novel.
So, what are the attitudes towards bare feet in the Almean cultures?
The ilii, ic?lani, and ktuvoks almost never wear anything on the feet (and are fairly careless about any other form of clothing).
- Warmaster
- Lebom
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 1:38 pm
- Location: Somewhere far beyond your reality (Exeter, England)
- Contact:
i'd always imagined them {especially the illi and Ktuvoki} only waring clothes to protect against the weather. after all, if you live underwater a lot, its probobly going to be a bit of a shock to the system getting out. though i wouldn't think they'd just ware clothes to "cover up"zompist wrote: The ilii, ic?lani, and ktuvoks almost never wear anything on the feet (and are fairly careless about any other form of clothing).
At least, thats what i think
Don't worry Girls, Explosions fix everything!
He who is also known as Ben
He who is also known as Ben
The ilii do use clothing for any really arduous cross-country travel. They (like the ktuvoks) can easily stand air temperatures down to freezing, but of course on land it can get much lower than that.Warmaster wrote:i'd always imagined them {especially the illi and Ktuvoki} only waring clothes to protect against the weather. after all, if you live underwater a lot, its probobly going to be a bit of a shock to the system getting out. though i wouldn't think they'd just ware clothes to "cover up"
Of course, during war, both ilii and ktuvoks will wear some sort of armor.
Ilii do wear things for adornment (though more in the way of jewelry and belts and crowns than actual clothes). Visiting human cities, some of them sometimes remember to wear something so as not to offend their hosts.
Ktuvoks may wear robes or armor during rituals-- it's all part of impressing the slaves.
To veer off the topic for a moment: I haven't read Trilby myself, but in an article on it that I saw a few years ago, it noted that Trilby was indeed described as going barefoot in the novel (and the stage play based on it), and that the artist hero, Little Billee, who loves her, paints pictures of her bare feet. However, it also noted that this was not meant as a foot fetish: the "barefoot" reference was a sidelong Victorian hint that Trilby was willing to pose for the artists in the nude, and as a shorthand for her wild, "scandalous" nature more generally.Shm Jay wrote:With all this foot discussion, I feel like I?m blundered into George DuMaurier?s novel Trilby!zompist wrote:Ah, good point. OK, cancel that order for narrower feet.
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/courses/rschwa ... rilby.html
One of the reasons why Trilby was such an exciting person is that she walked around in bare feet, or she was once bare-footed, or something like that. It?s been years since I read the novel.
Back to Almea: the elcari have not been mentioned, but I suspect that (a) they generally go about in shoes or boots--and often sturdy ones at that--but (b) when they do go barefoot, their feet are probably fairly tough to match the mountainous terrain where they live (Z mentioned that elcari feet are good for climbing), and much the same probably applies to the murtani.
p@,
Glenn
Do they also have 4 fingers? and in that case, do they use an octal (instead of decimal) system?Almean hominids have four toes
Sander/benanne
[b][url=http://benanne.net/misc/com.pdf]λemvrin eiδerial[/url][/b] (pdf)
[b][url=http://www.omniglot.com/writing/lembrin.htm]λemvrin eicrýs[/url][/b] (omniglot)
[b][url=http://benanne.net/misc/com.pdf]λemvrin eiδerial[/url][/b] (pdf)
[b][url=http://www.omniglot.com/writing/lembrin.htm]λemvrin eicrýs[/url][/b] (omniglot)
No, I think they have 5 fingers.Sander wrote:Do they also have 4 fingers? and in that case, do they use an octal (instead of decimal) system?Almean hominids have four toes
http://www.veche.net/
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
You don't need to have a different number of fingers to have a different base system. For example, still using fingers (for Earth), you could have a base-5 (one hand), base-10 (two hands), base-12 (two hands plus the two feet), or base-20 (all fingers and toes).Sander wrote:oh, pity, woulda been cool
And that's just assuming you use fingers and toes for the base of the number system. The system could actually be based on anything.
http://www.veche.net/
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
I just curious, what are the stories behind these other bases?zompist wrote:Just to confirm, Almean hominids have 10 fingers and 8 toes.
In the languages I've created so far, we have base 10 (the Easterners), base 6 (Wede:i), base 18 (Methaiun), and base 12 (Elkar?l).
http://www.veche.net/
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
http://www.veche.net/novegradian - Grammar of Novegradian
http://www.veche.net/alashian - Grammar of Alashian
All pretty simple:Maknas wrote:I just curious, what are the stories behind these other bases?zompist wrote:In the languages I've created so far, we have base 10 (the Easterners), base 6 (Wede:i), base 18 (Methaiun), and base 12 (Elkar?l).
The elcari consider 12 to be the most useful base for calculations: it's divisible into 2 (twice) and 3, which will be needed more often than division by 5.
The Wede:i had a different system of finger-counting: the fist alone = 1, then each of the fingers are extended in turn.
The Easterners generalized from the number of fingers; the Methaiun from the number of fingers plus toes.
I'm inclined to agree with them, as are my gnomes. Though I've done some comparative work on arithmetic patterns in different number bases, and there are a number of nice, more or less useful, patterns that exist in 10, but not 12 (or 8 or 16).zompist wrote:The elcari consider 12 to be the most useful base for calculations: it's divisible into 2 (twice) and 3, which will be needed more often than division by 5.
Though, there's somewhat of a sampling error there. I already know some pretyt non-obvious patterns in 10, which I can then see don't exist in, say 12. But patterns in 12, but not 10, of similar non-obviousness, I have not necessarily discovered.
Additionally, I'd point out that there is a way to derive base 12 from finger counting (and I think it's done, in India perhaps?). Count by touching your thumb to each joint of the fingers of one hand, and you get to 12 on one hand. Three on each of four fingers.
But it's sort of an assumption that all non-humans will use a number-system based on the number of fingers (or whatever) they have. Most, perhaps (perhaps not), but it shouldn't be esteemed as absolutely as it often is by conworlders. (Not intended to refer to Almea, just a theoretical aside)