Page 1 of 1

A small question on Ismain pronounciation

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 3:23 pm
by Ghost
Are EI and other diphthongs in Isma?n one sound, or seperate? Is Emei [EmEi]?

Ghost :?

Re: A small question on Ismain pronounciation

Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 6:35 pm
by zompist
Ghost wrote:Are EI and other diphthongs in Isma?n one sound, or seperate? Is Emei [EmEi]?
Separate, and each counts as a syllable, so it's [E 'mE i].

Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2004 8:27 pm
by Whimemsz
On the same subject, is the Isma?n /r/ pronounced [4] or [r]? What about /r=/, is it [4=], [r=], or [r\=]? Or something different?

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2004 12:31 am
by zompist
Whimemsz wrote:On the same subject, is the Isma?n /r/ pronounced [4] or [r]? What about /r=/, is it [4=], [r=], or [r\=]? Or something different?
Oh, you kids and your SAMPA. It's intended to be an approximant, probably similar to an English (i.e. of England) r, but neither flapped nor trilled.

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2004 10:11 am
by Ghost
Whimz, as you know Mandarin, could you help me with the alveolo-palatal fricatives ? & j. They're a bit confusing to me.
zompist wrote:Oh, you kids and your SAMPA.
:P

Ghost :roll:

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2004 6:14 pm
by pharazon
? is basically a /S/ with the tongue raised so there's friction at the palate, as for /C/ (and as a result the tip is pushed forward a bit to become alveolar).

Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2004 6:58 pm
by Whimemsz
Ghost wrote:Whimz, as you know Mandarin, could you help me with the alveolo-palatal fricatives ? & j. They're a bit confusing to me.
I'm flattered that you'd ask me, especially since I know about 20 words in Mandarin. Nevertheless...

Like /S/, but laminal, would be a close approximation, I'd say. And <j> is the voiced version. In other words, what Pharazon said.

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2004 6:52 am
by Salmoneus
Whimemsz wrote:
Ghost wrote:Whimz, as you know Mandarin, could you help me with the alveolo-palatal fricatives ? & j. They're a bit confusing to me.
I'm flattered that you'd ask me, especially since I know about 20 words in Mandarin. Nevertheless...

Like /S/, but laminal, would be a close approximation, I'd say. And <j> is the voiced version. In other words, what Pharazon said.
Is not /S/ normally laminal?

Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2004 5:29 pm
by Whimemsz
Salmoneus wrote:
Whimemsz wrote:
Ghost wrote:Whimz, as you know Mandarin, could you help me with the alveolo-palatal fricatives ? & j. They're a bit confusing to me.
I'm flattered that you'd ask me, especially since I know about 20 words in Mandarin. Nevertheless...

Like /S/, but laminal, would be a close approximation, I'd say. And <j> is the voiced version. In other words, what Pharazon said.
Is not /S/ normally laminal?
And by "laminal", I of course mean "the thing after laminal, whatever that may be."

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:00 am
by Aidan
Salmoneus wrote:
Whimemsz wrote:Like /S/, but laminal, would be a close approximation, I'd say. And <j> is the voiced version. In other words, what Pharazon said.
Is not /S/ normally laminal?
Is it? I don't think so, it seems primarily apical to me, though there is a bit of lamina action.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 6:51 am
by Salmoneus
IMI, its completely unapical. Tip of the tongue is behind the bottom gums. Except in /tS/, when it starts apical and moves laminal, but nnever as laminal as by itself.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 9:57 am
by Dudicon
Salmoneus wrote:IMI, its completely unapical. Tip of the tongue is behind the bottom gums. Except in /tS/, when it starts apical and moves laminal, but nnever as laminal as by itself.
The apex is the tip of the tongue, and the lamina the bit right behind it, to clear up any confusion.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 10:37 am
by Salmoneus
Yes, I know. Although I think laminal refers to any sound where the articulator is the blade of the tongue, rather than the tip - no matter how far back from the tip it may be.

My /S/ has the frication caused by the blade, far back. My /tS/ has an apical /t/, and then the /S/ starts apical and moves back to laminal as the tongue moves forward. But this time it is the front of the blade, a short distance behind the tip.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 11:06 am
by Dudicon
Salmoneus wrote:Yes, I know. Although I think laminal refers to any sound where the articulator is the blade of the tongue, rather than the tip - no matter how far back from the tip it may be.
Quite right--poor wording on my part.

Posted: Tue Jan 27, 2004 12:41 pm
by Nuntar
Salmoneus wrote:My /S/ has the frication caused by the blade, far back. My /tS/ has an apical /t/, and then the /S/ starts apical and moves back to laminal as the tongue moves forward. But this time it is the front of the blade, a short distance behind the tip.
That seems rather weird to me; I'm pretty sure my /tS/ and /S/ are both laminal, as is post-alveolar /t/ by itself (e.g. in select).