A small question on Ismain pronounciation
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2004 3:23 pm
Are EI and other diphthongs in Isma?n one sound, or seperate? Is Emei [EmEi]?
Ghost
Ghost
WE ARE MOVING - see Ephemera
http://www.incatena.org/
Separate, and each counts as a syllable, so it's [E 'mE i].Ghost wrote:Are EI and other diphthongs in Isma?n one sound, or seperate? Is Emei [EmEi]?
Oh, you kids and your SAMPA. It's intended to be an approximant, probably similar to an English (i.e. of England) r, but neither flapped nor trilled.Whimemsz wrote:On the same subject, is the Isma?n /r/ pronounced [4] or [r]? What about /r=/, is it [4=], [r=], or [r\=]? Or something different?
zompist wrote:Oh, you kids and your SAMPA.
I'm flattered that you'd ask me, especially since I know about 20 words in Mandarin. Nevertheless...Ghost wrote:Whimz, as you know Mandarin, could you help me with the alveolo-palatal fricatives ? & j. They're a bit confusing to me.
Is not /S/ normally laminal?Whimemsz wrote:I'm flattered that you'd ask me, especially since I know about 20 words in Mandarin. Nevertheless...Ghost wrote:Whimz, as you know Mandarin, could you help me with the alveolo-palatal fricatives ? & j. They're a bit confusing to me.
Like /S/, but laminal, would be a close approximation, I'd say. And <j> is the voiced version. In other words, what Pharazon said.
And by "laminal", I of course mean "the thing after laminal, whatever that may be."Salmoneus wrote:Is not /S/ normally laminal?Whimemsz wrote:I'm flattered that you'd ask me, especially since I know about 20 words in Mandarin. Nevertheless...Ghost wrote:Whimz, as you know Mandarin, could you help me with the alveolo-palatal fricatives ? & j. They're a bit confusing to me.
Like /S/, but laminal, would be a close approximation, I'd say. And <j> is the voiced version. In other words, what Pharazon said.
Is it? I don't think so, it seems primarily apical to me, though there is a bit of lamina action.Salmoneus wrote:Is not /S/ normally laminal?Whimemsz wrote:Like /S/, but laminal, would be a close approximation, I'd say. And <j> is the voiced version. In other words, what Pharazon said.
The apex is the tip of the tongue, and the lamina the bit right behind it, to clear up any confusion.Salmoneus wrote:IMI, its completely unapical. Tip of the tongue is behind the bottom gums. Except in /tS/, when it starts apical and moves laminal, but nnever as laminal as by itself.
Quite right--poor wording on my part.Salmoneus wrote:Yes, I know. Although I think laminal refers to any sound where the articulator is the blade of the tongue, rather than the tip - no matter how far back from the tip it may be.
That seems rather weird to me; I'm pretty sure my /tS/ and /S/ are both laminal, as is post-alveolar /t/ by itself (e.g. in select).Salmoneus wrote:My /S/ has the frication caused by the blade, far back. My /tS/ has an apical /t/, and then the /S/ starts apical and moves back to laminal as the tongue moves forward. But this time it is the front of the blade, a short distance behind the tip.