How did you decide on the intelligent beings?

Questions or discussions about Almea or Verduria-- also the Incatena. Also good for postings in Almean languages.
User avatar
vec
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:42 am
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Contact:

How did you decide on the intelligent beings?

Post by vec »

Zompist, how did you? When I look at them, they're obviously D&D beings, changed a lot. But were those the original beings that were used when you played originally in Collage?
vec

zompist
Boardlord
Boardlord
Posts: 3368
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 8:26 pm
Location: In the den
Contact:

Post by zompist »

Heh, no-- back in college they were compatible with the D&D races, though the names do date back that far. Later on I started to differentiate them.

User avatar
vec
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:42 am
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Contact:

Post by vec »

Ok... The thing is, I've been trying to figure out races to use, and it's harder than staying awake over The Dawn of the Dead. However, I don't wan't many races and if I look over the Monstrous Compendium or something I want so many races...
vec

User avatar
Space Dracula
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:10 pm
Location: Austin fuckin Texas
Contact:

Post by Space Dracula »

vegfarandi wrote:Ok... The thing is, I've been trying to figure out races to use, and it's harder than staying awake over The Dawn of the Dead. However, I don't wan't many races and if I look over the Monstrous Compendium or something I want so many races...
Ooo! A pop culture reference!

Man, Marky-Mark Rosenfelder, those ktuvoki are as ugly as William Hung's singing.

This entire forum is basically "Ask Mark".
<Dudicon> i would but you're too fat to fit in my mouth!!

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Post by Salmoneus »

I'd say that its best to use the fewest number of intelligent races you canallow yourself to get away with. Non-human races cause all sorts of problems, and its difficult to answer them without stereotyping yourself - how do they react with humans, how does their biology effect their society? All too often they end up effectively the same as humans - species effectively become races. And its difficult not to end up having elves and dwarves.
If you do have other races, its probably best to have them be out of the way of the main story.

As for deciding which to have, I'd advise throwing out the D&D manual from the start. Firstly, work out what biological characteristics you want them to have. Then work out what sort of animal this makes them. Then work out how their society is likely to differ from human ones.
If you don't have any biological characteristics in mind, but only social ones, think seriously about whether you need them to be alien at all - humans can probably create most societies by themselves.

*goes away and tries desperately to take own advise*
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

User avatar
vec
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:42 am
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Contact:

Post by vec »

Thanks Psalm!
vec

User avatar
Warmaster
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 1:38 pm
Location: Somewhere far beyond your reality (Exeter, England)
Contact:

Post by Warmaster »

I hear you Sal, i'm struggling there myself, but its something that i want to do. i've got about 8 or 9 non human sentient races, three are utterly different from humans though so thats not a problem, but the other five are still "too human" for my liking. Still, its a fun challange to make them unique, if a very difficult one
Don't worry Girls, Explosions fix everything!

He who is also known as Ben

Aidan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 12:03 am
Location: Tâl Katar
Contact:

Post by Aidan »

Salmoneus wrote:I'd say that its best to use the fewest number of intelligent races you canallow yourself to get away with. Non-human races cause all sorts of problems, and its difficult to answer them without stereotyping yourself - how do they react with humans, how does their biology effect their society? All too often they end up effectively the same as humans - species effectively become races. And its difficult not to end up having elves and dwarves.
If you do have other races, its probably best to have them be out of the way of the main story.
For me, exploring evolutionary pathways, evoltuionary psychology, and sociobiology are some of the most interesting things, so I disagree that less is always more here. (I've got 21 sentient species.)
Salmoneus wrote:As for deciding which to have, I'd advise throwing out the D&D manual from the start. Firstly, work out what biological characteristics you want them to have. Then work out what sort of animal this makes them. Then work out how their society is likely to differ from human ones.
If you don't have any biological characteristics in mind, but only social ones, think seriously about whether you need them to be alien at all - humans can probably create most societies by themselves.
On the other hand, I agree entirely with all of this.

It depends on the kind of world and stories you're building, but my personal prejudices say, strive to make humans unexceptionable among your other species. It's very rarely done. Almost all multi-species set ups give humans a special place.

Usually, all the other species are more specialized, but humans retain their flexibility. Which usually comes down to meaning all the others are caricatures.

Make humans unique among your species, certainly, otherwise it means your other species are human-clones that don't need to be species, but make everyone else unique in the same ways.

That reminds me, I've been meaning to write a review of Treasure Planet on my LiveJournal.

User avatar
vec
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:42 am
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Contact:

Post by vec »

So, you're saying if I had dwarves, they should be greedy miners in the mountains and the humans should be powerstriving and curious merchants? Or am I getting this all wrong ...
vec

Aidan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 12:03 am
Location: Tâl Katar
Contact:

Post by Aidan »

vegfarandi wrote:So, you're saying if I had dwarves, they should be greedy miners in the mountains and the humans should be powerstriving and curious merchants? Or am I getting this all wrong ...
Backwards. We know that us-humans are not all powerstriving and curious merchants. So if any other species is a such a caricature, it's unreasonable. Other species should be have a more or less equivalent range of personality and behavior as the one sentient species we've actually observed.

An equal range, but not the same range.

User avatar
vec
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:42 am
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Contact:

Post by vec »

I have one question related to this topic. What exactly were the DnD species you used? And also, are the ilii still ... ehm ... not extinct? Are they still up and running?
vec

User avatar
So Haleza Grise
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2002 11:17 pm

Post by So Haleza Grise »

vegfarandi wrote:I have one question related to this topic. What exactly were the DnD species you used? And also, are the ilii still ... ehm ... not extinct? Are they still up and running?
humans/humans
elves/ilii
dwarves/elcari
halflings/ic?lani
goblins/murtani.

Other D&D beasties, such as trolls, vampires and giants, also make appearances in various different forms.

I suppose Mark should be chuffed that someone wasn't able to make the links.

The ilii are still very much a going concern - but they tend to stay out of contact with humans. This is made easier by the fact that their habitats are mostly acquatic. See a map of their distribution here, as well as other information about the various races.

User avatar
vec
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 639
Joined: Tue Sep 16, 2003 10:42 am
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Contact:

Post by vec »

I thought it was completly different. That's a good sign. But where do the ktuvok? come from? Are they a later invention?
vec

zompist
Boardlord
Boardlord
Posts: 3368
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 8:26 pm
Location: In the den
Contact:

Post by zompist »

vegfarandi wrote:But where do the ktuvok? come from? Are they a later invention?
The ktuvoks don't correspond to any D&D species.

SHG's surmises about the original identifications are correct, though I never thought of the ic?lani as halflingish. They and the ilii have been modified quite a bit.

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Post by Salmoneus »

I was assumed the Icelani had been Wild Elves.
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Post by Salmoneus »

But then, I also always assumed that the ktuvoks were Sahuagin - nasty ugly underwater things, closely related to the sea elves, but also their hated archenemies. Which shows how bad my assumptions are.
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

Aidan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 104
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2002 12:03 am
Location: Tâl Katar
Contact:

Post by Aidan »

vegfarandi wrote:And also, are the ilii still ... ehm ... not extinct? Are they still up and running?
Extraodrinarily confusingly, the technical term for the opposite of "extinct" is "extant".

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Post by Drydic »

Aidan wrote:
vegfarandi wrote:And also, are the ilii still ... ehm ... not extinct? Are they still up and running?
Extraodrinarily confusingly, the technical term for the opposite of "extinct" is "extant".
Which of course no one who is something a layperson might actually read uses it, substituting the much more preactical 'living'.
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
Nuntar
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:07 am
Location: [16.50.72.0]
Contact:

Post by Nuntar »

I've used "extant". It's probably the only word in the language that rhymes with "sextant", which makes it indispensible.

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Post by Salmoneus »

I certainly use "extant", though I don't think I've actually used it to mean the opposite of extinct. I just use it for "existing", but without the connotations of pre-existence that "existing" has.
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Post by Drydic »

Ahribar wrote:I've used "extant". It's probably the only word in the language that rhymes with "sextant", which makes it indispensible.
They don't rime for me. [Ekst?nt] vs [sEkstn=t]. But I'm weird.
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
Jaaaaaa
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 165
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2002 6:01 pm
Location: Illinois, USA
Contact:

Post by Jaaaaaa »

Drydic_guy wrote:
Ahribar wrote:I've used "extant". It's probably the only word in the language that rhymes with "sextant", which makes it indispensible.
They don't rime for me. [Ekst?nt] vs [sEkstn=t]. But I'm weird.
What he said.

Especailly that last part.

User avatar
Whimemsz
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Gimaamaa onibaaganing

Post by Whimemsz »

Lol.

But, same here.

[Ek_hs."t_h{~Int_h] versus ["sEks.t_hn=t_}].

User avatar
Ngo
Niš
Niš
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2004 4:30 pm
Contact:

Post by Ngo »

Whimemsz wrote:Lol.

But, same here.

[Ek_hs."t_h{~Int_h] versus ["sEks.t_hn=t_}].
I have /EkstE~nt/ and /sEkstn=t/

User avatar
Nuntar
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 128
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2003 7:07 am
Location: [16.50.72.0]
Contact:

Post by Nuntar »

So you pronounce extant the same as extent?

Just checked the OED; it gives both pronunciations ["Ekst@nt] and [Eks"t{nt], but the first (which matches mine) is given as more usual.

Post Reply