Page 1 of 1

A nitpic

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 9:57 am
by vec
Mark, on the Elkar?l language page, wrote:E.g., u is the same as the Russian bI or Japanese u, IPA y.
I just wanted to point out, IPA y is not an unrounded u. [uu] (kind of) is.

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 10:11 am
by vec
I was also wondering, how is the Kebreni eng featured in the Verdurian alphabeth. There isn't any mentioning of it there.

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 10:50 am
by zompist
The first one is probably a bug in my Word-to-html transcription software.

I'll look at the Kebreni eng and see what's going on with it.

Re: A nitpic

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 11:27 am
by DF
vegfarandi wrote:
Mark, on the Elkar?l language page, wrote:E.g., u is the same as the Russian bI or Japanese u, IPA y.
I just wanted to point out, IPA y is not an unrounded u. [uu] (kind of) is.
I thought it was [M]...

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 11:51 am
by vec
Yeah, in X-SAMPA.

Re: A nitpic

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 12:49 pm
by Whimemsz
vegfarandi wrote:
Mark, on the Elkar?l language page, wrote:E.g., u is the same as the Russian bI or Japanese u, IPA y.
I just wanted to point out, IPA y is not an unrounded u. [uu] (kind of) is.
And isn't the Russian <bI> /1/, not /M/?

Posted: Wed May 26, 2004 2:06 pm
by Miekko
I have seen claims for the Russian bI to be anything from /1/ to /M/, but according to the most thorough phonology for Russian I've ever seen, it does have a considerable number of allophones that glide so we have /M+_1+/ and similar stuff (especially with labials these are usual iirc).