giant swamps
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:16 pm
- Location: Knoxville TN (Try to control your envy.)
giant swamps
I was thinking about what it would be like to have a giant inland swamp in a con-world. Like the size of India. Is it possible? How could it form? I know nothing about this, and I'm interested any info you have on this subject.
Economic Left/Right: -5.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.33
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.33
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 4:15 pm
- Location: the workers' state of the upper country
- Contact:
Re: giant swamps
Maybe a giant ancient inland sea that was covered over then collapsed? It's pretty implausible.
- 2+3 clusivity
- Avisaru
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:34 pm
Re: giant swamps
I think that at some point in time much of North America between the Rockies and Appalachian mountains was a shallow inland sea/swamp. Maybe there were some pretty intense mangroves . . . ?
EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interior_Seaway
EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Interior_Seaway
linguoboy wrote:So that's what it looks like when the master satirist is moistened by his own moutarde.
Re: giant swamps
Drainage into an inland area tends to form a lake, but with some pretty intense plant action a swamp/bog could be achieved.
Glossing Abbreviations: COMP = comparative, C = complementiser, ACS / ICS = accessible / inaccessible, GDV = gerundive, SPEC / NSPC = specific / non-specific
________
MY MUSIC
________
MY MUSIC
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2014 4:16 pm
- Location: Knoxville TN (Try to control your envy.)
Re: giant swamps
I want a large inland expanse (Not India size, but huge.), in my conworld, that is mostly just a couple meters below sea level (With deviations into hills and lakes of course.), surrounded by higher elevation land. Would that lowland area turn into a giant swamp region? Sorry I know I'm just firing off questions like a toddler.
Economic Left/Right: -5.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.33
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.33
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:26 pm
Re: giant swamps
It's your world and it seems plausible enough to me, so go for it.
Re: giant swamps
If you have a large area, adjacent to the ocean and varying just a bit above and below high tide, you might get a sequence of flooded at high tide - swampy mess as water is caught behind dikes and in depressions - flooded - swamp - flooded - swamp. But you'd expect erosion to take its toll relatively quickly, and in order for it to get to that point without erosion already having slowly chipped away at it and prevented such a thing from occurring, I'd think you'd need it to be recent, like a rapidly rising ocean level. The larger the area it's covering, the faster I'd think it would erode as the tides rush in and out. Dense plant material and lots of natural dikes would probably counter it a bit.
Flora and fauna might be be a bit odd, as they'd need to be saltwater-adapted even if the swamp area extends far inland.
Disclaimer: This is definitely armchair theorizing.
Flora and fauna might be be a bit odd, as they'd need to be saltwater-adapted even if the swamp area extends far inland.
Disclaimer: This is definitely armchair theorizing.
Re: giant swamps
A hard soil could help. Much of Alaska consists of swamps because permafrost stays frozen and the rain that falls in summer can't penetrate through the frozen soil the way it would in a warmer climate. Much of the year, of course, the water is frozen so while it is still considered a swamp it wouldn't be habitable for most anything that we think of when we think of wetlands. Could there be a soil so hard that even in summer it is as impenetrable as ice, yet plants can still grow in it? I don't know, but it would get you a swamp as big as you want, with only the rainfall needed to keep it wet.
And now Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey with our weather report:
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:26 pm
Re: giant swamps
California Central Valley hard-pan is pretty tough, not quite impermeable, I don't think though. Clay is normally impermeable.Publipis wrote:A hard soil could help. Much of Alaska consists of swamps because permafrost stays frozen and the rain that falls in summer can't penetrate through the frozen soil the way it would in a warmer climate. Much of the year, of course, the water is frozen so while it is still considered a swamp it wouldn't be habitable for most anything that we think of when we think of wetlands. Could there be a soil so hard that even in summer it is as impenetrable as ice, yet plants can still grow in it? I don't know, but it would get you a swamp as big as you want, with only the rainfall needed to keep it wet.
Re: giant swamps
The Central Valley actually had pretty extensive wetlands before it was converted to agricultural land, including a huge, freshwater lake that was once the largest in North America west of the Mississippi. The borders of the lake were extremely marshy (hence why it was named after the Tules that grew thickly around it's circumference), and it's size and depth changed considerably by season and from year to year.CaesarVincens wrote:California Central Valley hard-pan is pretty tough, not quite impermeable, I don't think though. Clay is normally impermeable.Publipis wrote:A hard soil could help. Much of Alaska consists of swamps because permafrost stays frozen and the rain that falls in summer can't penetrate through the frozen soil the way it would in a warmer climate. Much of the year, of course, the water is frozen so while it is still considered a swamp it wouldn't be habitable for most anything that we think of when we think of wetlands. Could there be a soil so hard that even in summer it is as impenetrable as ice, yet plants can still grow in it? I don't know, but it would get you a swamp as big as you want, with only the rainfall needed to keep it wet.
Here's one artist's conception of what California might have looked like from space circa 1850:
In addition to Tulare Lake, you can see a massive marsh where the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers come together. Much of the area around the San Francisco Bay would be estuaries and tidal marshes as well, particularly at the northern and southern ends.
Hopefully that's useful to the OP in terms of inspiration; mostly I just really like that picture. >_>
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:26 pm
Re: giant swamps
True, I forget about Tule Lake. The estuary is still pretty marshy even now, but I'm sure it was even marshier before the water was diverted for agriculture.CatDoom wrote:The Central Valley actually had pretty extensive wetlands before it was converted to agricultural land, including a huge, freshwater lake that was once the largest in North America west of the Mississippi. The borders of the lake were extremely marshy (hence why it was named after the Tules that grew thickly around it's circumference), and it's size and depth changed considerably by season and from year to year.CaesarVincens wrote:California Central Valley hard-pan is pretty tough, not quite impermeable, I don't think though. Clay is normally impermeable.Publipis wrote:A hard soil could help. Much of Alaska consists of swamps because permafrost stays frozen and the rain that falls in summer can't penetrate through the frozen soil the way it would in a warmer climate. Much of the year, of course, the water is frozen so while it is still considered a swamp it wouldn't be habitable for most anything that we think of when we think of wetlands. Could there be a soil so hard that even in summer it is as impenetrable as ice, yet plants can still grow in it? I don't know, but it would get you a swamp as big as you want, with only the rainfall needed to keep it wet.
Here's one artist's conception of what California might have looked like from space circa 1850:
[snip]
In addition to Tulare Lake, you can see a massive marsh where the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers come together. Much of the area around the San Francisco Bay would be estuaries and tidal marshes as well, particularly at the northern and southern ends.
Hopefully that's useful to the OP in terms of inspiration; mostly I just really like that picture. >_>
- 2+3 clusivity
- Avisaru
- Posts: 454
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:34 pm
Re: giant swamps
If you want to make your swamp 100% better, I give you: http://www.bbc.com/travel/slideshow/201 ... id-rainbow
linguoboy wrote:So that's what it looks like when the master satirist is moistened by his own moutarde.
Re: giant swamps
You might be interested in reading about the West Siberian Lowlands' wetlands:
http://www.biome-explorer.net/Wetlands/ ... lands.html
http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/150734/
Peat swamp forests of Borneo; though not phenomenally vast, are still huge.
And let's not forget the flooded forests of Amazonia, the blackwater Igapó and the whitewater Várzea.
http://www.biome-explorer.net/Wetlands/ ... lands.html
http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/150734/
Peat swamp forests of Borneo; though not phenomenally vast, are still huge.
And let's not forget the flooded forests of Amazonia, the blackwater Igapó and the whitewater Várzea.
- the duke of nuke
- Avisaru
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 1:23 pm
- Location: Leicestershire
- Contact:
Re: giant swamps
Europe's contribution: the Pinsk Marshes.
XinuX wrote:I learned this language, but then I sneezed and now am in prison for high treason. 0/10 would not speak again.