Help your conlang fluency (2)

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
User avatar
Arzena
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:19 pm
Location: ¡California, Tejas, Marruecos!

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Arzena »

Travis B. wrote:Ha yuh pa rklan aram ya lkhyun glya yuh?
[ha juh pa ɻəklan ʔaɻam ja ləcʰun glja juh]
Is it also influenced by Aramaic?
Eywa bes lo ẖossēt ẖissat tatiraš agen anayi odi lugus asira, Arabiya her u her yani
yes but NEG think-PRET.1sg thought-CONS influence-3sg now that-1sg know.fa'il language.pl contemporary-FEM.pl Arabic every and every 3sg-mean
ej.wa | bɛs lɔ xɔs.seːt xis.sæt tæ.ti.ræʃ æ.gɛn æ.næ.ji ɔ.di lu.gus æ.si.ræ | æ.ræ.bi.jæ jæ.ni
Yes, but I have not yet thought of its influence yet because I know the modern languages, Arabic etc. I mean.
A New Yorker wrote:Isn't it sort of a relief to talk about the English Premier League instead of the sad state of publishing?
Abi wrote:At this point it seems pretty apparent that PIE was simply an ancient esperanto gone awry.
Shtåså, Empotle7á, Neire Wippwo

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

Mang 'baekrah ra rklan aram ya lkhyaentara ang rklan 'kat ya n'gra ra rklan aram ya gmkhaopta yuh kha 'kyo blah ya.
[maŋ ʔəbɛkɻah ɻa ɻəklan ʔaɻam ja ləcʰɛntaɻa ʔaŋ ɻəklan ʔəkat̚ ja ŋgɻa ɻa ɻəklan ʔaɻam ja gəməkʰɔp̚ta juh kʰa ʔəco blah ja]
I would expect that Aramabic would have had much influence on Akkadian since Aramaic caused it to go extinct in reality.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

syzithryx
Niš
Niš
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:03 am

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by syzithryx »

Uhag Hilun ivzile maythtolu - ayam ziryt evyoki.
[ʊfᶣäg fᶣɪlun ɪvzɪlɛ mäiθtolu - äiäm zɪɾit ɛvjokɪ]

Hil (the sound I express by the letter H) is not a labiodental (lip-tooth) approximant (almost-sound) - it has too much wind.

Hil is pronounced as [f] with the mouth in the [ɘ] position, I think, but whenever I say it it seems to go from half-rounded to unrounded, in a gentle slide, which can't really be expressed in any symbols. A close approximation is [hʋ] or [fʋ] but [hɹ] or [fɹ] is also close. Or even [hɘ] or [fɘ]. It's in between all of those though, somehow, if that makes any sense. Directly in the middle. I want to transcribe it as [fʰɘ], though I am still unhappy with that as it is a consonant, not a whole syllable. *shrug*

Another possibility is that it's like ɥ, only with wind. Maybe fᶣ?

To make the Hil sound, first pronounce a [j]. Then, round your lips - [jʷ] or [ɥ]. Now blow. I think that's [fᶣ]. If you're doing it right it sounds like a cross between [h], [f], [ɹ], and [ʃ]. I think that's the right spelling maybe, [fᶣ]. Hmm... it's a very odd sound though isn't it?

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

syzithryx wrote:I think that's [fᶣ].
I'd think that's probably [ɸʷ] then (a bilablial rounded fricative)?


JAL

syzithryx
Niš
Niš
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:03 am

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by syzithryx »

No, I tried ɸʷ but it's not right. As I said there's a [j]ness to it. And I think it's labiodental, not bilabial, though I can't be sure. It's got to be either fᶣ or ɸᶣ.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

syzithryx wrote:It's got to be either fᶣ or ɸᶣ.
Unless I'm severely mistaken, ᶣ is not an IPA diacritic. If it has a "j-ness", it would be more like [fʲ]. That, or you have a co-articulated beast akin to Swedish [ɧ].


JAL

syzithryx
Niš
Niš
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri Mar 18, 2016 9:03 am

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by syzithryx »

According to Wikipedia, it is an IPA diacritic, though a very rarely used on, for consonants which are simultaneously labialized and palatized.

*looks up ɧ"

*slackjawed*

That's it! Reading the description and listening to the sound of it on Wikipedia, I'm pretty sure that's either exactly my H, or very close! Though I don't pronounced it as a cross between ʃ and x, but that's the closest anything has come to it. I'll start using that symbol for it from now on. Thanks! :)

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

syzithryx wrote:According to Wikipedia, it is an IPA diacritic, though a very rarely used on, for consonants which are simultaneously labialized and palatized.
Yeah, it transparently derives from [ɥ], but nevertheless it doesn't appear on the IPA chart.
That's it! Reading the description and listening to the sound of it on Wikipedia, I'm pretty sure that's either exactly my H, or very close! Though I don't pronounced it as a cross between ʃ and x, but that's the closest anything has come to it. I'll start using that symbol for it from now on. Thanks!
You're most welcome. Rest assured that [ɧ] doesn't have a standardized pronunciation in Sweden either, and actual realisation wildly varies (or so I've been told). So using it to describe your H would be a no-brainer. Problem solved!


JAL

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

jal wrote:
syzithryx wrote:According to Wikipedia, it is an IPA diacritic, though a very rarely used on, for consonants which are simultaneously labialized and palatized.
Yeah, it transparently derives from [ɥ], but nevertheless it doesn't appear on the IPA chart.
It should be remembered, though, that there are useful symbols which are not strictly part of IPA but which are commonly used in combination with IPA proper, such as [ȶ ȡ ȵ ȴ].
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

Yu ray. So no les tok nes yus minu langwic*.
You are right. So now let's talk in our language again.

*I should create a word for "conlang". The problem is, "kon" means "cunt" and is a strong swear word, so "konlangwic" is out.


JAL

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

«Conlang» plyer tshyak ya ya lao «rklan mtre» phyaeng «constructed language variety» ya ya.
[ˈkʰãːnˌʟ̞ẽːŋ pljeɻ tsʰjak̚ ja ja lɔ ɻəklan mətʂe pʰjɛŋ kʰn̩ˈɕtɕʁʌʔktɘːt ˈʟ̞ẽːŋgwɘːtʃ vəːˈʁaːeɘɾiː ja ja]
"Conlang" in Tshyak is "rklan mtre", which means "constructed language variety".
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

I am not sure if I like having every NP other than a pronoun end in a determiner. While it resolves a lot of grammatical problems (combined with making every relative clause after the first one after a noun begin with a word roughly meaning "and"), without which it would be very easy to construct very ambiguous sentences due to which noun relative clauses would belong to within nested relative clauses and whether clauses are relative clauses or are serial verb construnctions in the first place being ambiguous, it results in multiple determiners stranded at the very end of nested relative clauses, such as the instances of ya ya above. However, I do not know how to resolve this issue without said determiners or case endings at the end of NPs while still retaining an SVO-serial verb word order and a N-relative word order while not marking nouns for number or having gender which could serve to disambiguate.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
Imralu
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1640
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:14 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Imralu »

Travis B. wrote:I am not sure if I like having every NP other than a pronoun end in a determiner. While it resolves a lot of grammatical problems (combined with making every relative clause after the first one after a noun begin with a word roughly meaning "and"), without which it would be very easy to construct very ambiguous sentences due to which noun relative clauses would belong to within nested relative clauses and whether clauses are relative clauses or are serial verb construnctions in the first place being ambiguous, it results in multiple determiners stranded at the very end of nested relative clauses, such as the instances of ya ya above. However, I do not know how to resolve this issue without said determiners or case endings at the end of NPs while still retaining an SVO-serial verb word order and a N-relative word order while not marking nouns for number or having gender which could serve to disambiguate.
Could you put the determiner before the relative clause?
Glossing Abbreviations: COMP = comparative, C = complementiser, ACS / ICS = accessible / inaccessible, GDV = gerundive, SPEC / NSPC = specific / non-specific
________
MY MUSIC

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

Imralu wrote:
Travis B. wrote:I am not sure if I like having every NP other than a pronoun end in a determiner. While it resolves a lot of grammatical problems (combined with making every relative clause after the first one after a noun begin with a word roughly meaning "and"), without which it would be very easy to construct very ambiguous sentences due to which noun relative clauses would belong to within nested relative clauses and whether clauses are relative clauses or are serial verb construnctions in the first place being ambiguous, it results in multiple determiners stranded at the very end of nested relative clauses, such as the instances of ya ya above. However, I do not know how to resolve this issue without said determiners or case endings at the end of NPs while still retaining an SVO-serial verb word order and a N-relative word order while not marking nouns for number or having gender which could serve to disambiguate.
Could you put the determiner before the relative clause?
The thing is that would defeat the whole point of having said determiners, i.e. that determiners let the listener know the level of nesting a relative clause or serial verb is at.

For instance, because the language is SVO, has relative clauses following nouns, and has VO or VS relative clauses and VO serial verb constructions, you can have a series of nouns and verbs taking the following form:

N V N V N V N V N

Because in many cases verb agreement is unmarked (with 3rd sg. subjects and objects), and there is no number or gender on nouns themselves to directly agree with one can come up with multiple alternative structures, where the () marks NPs, [] marks relative clauses, and {} marks serial verb constructions, such as:

N V (N [V N] [V N] [V N])

or:

N V (N [V (N [V (N [V N])])])

or:

N V (N [V N]) {V (N [V N])}

or:

(N [V N]) V (N [V N {V N}])

and so on...

Relative clauses and serial verbs could be distinguished by making an explicit relative clause marker or serial verb marker. I have found it necessary to use a conjunction to mark relative clauses after the first relative clause qualifying a noun. However, this in itself does not solve the nesting level problem, because it does not tell you what level of nesting a relative clause or serial verb construction actually belongs to.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

Mae tyaoram keh khur plyer tshyak ya thi kaoh ra mae kehram prael 'tri rklan ya plyer rklan mtre at.
[mɛ tjɔɻam keh kʰuɻ pljeɻ tsʰjak̚ ja tʰi kɔh ɻa mɛ keɻ̥am pɻɛl ʔətʂi ɻəklan ja pljeɻ ɻəklan mətʂe ʔat̚]
I should speak more in Tshyak but it is hard for me to speak about conlanging in a constructed language.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

CatDoom
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 739
Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 1:12 am

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by CatDoom »

Nyasroza u su som, bep’au edohecricab nan "Rrom Tim Jehnom." Nyabing fi som lyen na fi som re.
[ɲãʐoˈd̪z̪a uˈz̪u s̪õm | pəˈp'ɔː əd̪ohəʈʂʰiˈt̪s̪ʰap̚ nãn rõm t̪ʰĩm tɕəˈn̥õm || ɲãˈbĩŋ fi s̪õm ʎẽn nã fi s̪õm ɻe]
I have been working on this language, which is now called "Rrom Tim Jehnom." I like the new language better than the old one.
Last edited by CatDoom on Wed Mar 23, 2016 12:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

Travis, mi tingk yu a luk dem payrat bifo yu re sel. Nof nof langwic, it me olda langwic, kan bil sensen im me konfon o misop. Langwic u dobl mining olda taym!
Travis, I think you are seeing problems that aren't there. Many languages, if not all languages, allow building sentences that can be confusing or misunderstood. Languages are ambiguous all the time!


JAL

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

Yo lao ngya ra ka sklar n'grotya at geya ka thi ra sklar at sahyama pphyaeng sdrekya nyokya ang at ka.
[jo lɔ ɲa ɻa ka səklaɻ ŋgɻotja ʔat̚ geja ka tʰi ɻa səklaɻ ʔat̚ saçama pəpʰjɛŋ sədʐeca njoca ʔaŋ ʔat̚ ka]
It is not that there are ambiguous sentences but that sentences have so many different meanings.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

Travis B. wrote:It is not that there are ambiguous sentences but that sentences have so many different meanings.
Yu ray les tek diconari fayn "dobl mining".
You should use a dictionary to look up "ambiguous".


JAL

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

jal wrote:
Travis B. wrote:It is not that there are ambiguous sentences but that sentences have so many different meanings.
Yu ray les tek diconari fayn "dobl mining".
You should use a dictionary to look up "ambiguous".
What I meant is that on one hand there are sentences which can have, in theory, more than one meaning, but where one can generally usually tell the right meaning in practice, while on the other hand there are sentences where no clue is given as to what meaning is the "right" one.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

Travis B. wrote:What I meant is that on one hand there are sentences which can have, in theory, more than one meaning, but where one can generally usually tell the right meaning in practice, while on the other hand there are sentences where no clue is given as to what meaning is the "right" one.
I know that's what you mean, but that's just how language works, isn't it? If you have created something that's ambiguous in every sentence, than you need some more grammar :).


JAL

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

jal wrote:
Travis B. wrote:What I meant is that on one hand there are sentences which can have, in theory, more than one meaning, but where one can generally usually tell the right meaning in practice, while on the other hand there are sentences where no clue is given as to what meaning is the "right" one.
I know that's what you mean, but that's just how language works, isn't it? If you have created something that's ambiguous in every sentence, than you need some more grammar :)
Of course, and the "more grammar" I have opted for is determiners marking the ends of NPs; I just am not entirely satisfied with the approach, though, and am wondering if anyone else has any better approach that achieves the same goals.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by jal »

Travis B. wrote:Of course, and the "more grammar" I have opted for is determiners marking the ends of NPs; I just am not entirely satisfied with the approach, though, and am wondering if anyone else has any better approach that achieves the same goals.
Could you create a new thread in C&CQ for that? I'd be happy to take a closer look, ova dis yahn in ray pah fo dis :)
...this thread is not the right place for that


JAL

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

Tretam shaey gye nju yo at kha leng.
[tʂetam ɕɛj ɟe ɲdʑu jo ʔat̚ kʰa leŋ]
I have now created a new thread for it.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Help your conlang fluency

Post by Travis B. »

Kraoyam law leng n'gra ra ka ployam ngya zram nju 'thae yo ya dryang sray leng at ka.
[kɻɔjam law leŋ ŋgɻa ɻa ka plojam ɲa ʐam ɲdʑu ʔətʰɛ jo ja dʐjaŋ ʂaj leŋ ʔat̚ ka]
I am staying with this because I do not know a better way of doing it than this.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

Post Reply