Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
Alcu forzul çé gompa.
1s-2dat grieve-atelic-durative causative loss I'm sorry for your loss.
Middle Tshyak traditional orthography: Bey nu gu nda le tri glweng praelya klan nay jer khaong go ley thi yo glaew ngya nu ka.
Middle Tshyak "grammarian" orthography: Pey nu-qu-da le tsrí kyoeng psráely kyán nay-tsyee-qháong-ko ley thí yoe kyaew nya nu ka.
Middle Tshyak transcription: [pēj nūqūdā lē tʂí kjø̄ŋ pʂɛ́ʎ kján nājtɕēːqʰɔ́ŋkō lēj tʰí jø̄ kjɛ̄w ɲā nū ká]
Old Tshyak orthography: Bey nu gu nda g'lwengamah praelya rklan nay jer khaong go thi yo glaew ngya nu ka.
Old Tshyak transcription: [bej nu gu nda gəlweŋamah pɻɛlja ɻəklan naj dʑeɻ kʰɔŋ go tʰi jo glɛw ɲa nu ka]
The name Nhugunda makes me think of Niger-Congo languages but it does not look like one.
Last edited by Travis B. on Mon Mar 28, 2016 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nijercongo? Pasanho auta lical súrtoi Portugãda! Aio...
Niger-Congo / True-ADV 1sn-3sing.acc-cold prefer-punc.telic akin-durative-atelic Portuguese / [Surprise-and-dismay particle] Niger-Congo? Honestly, I was hoping it would sound more like Portuguese. Oh, dear...
Pedant wrote:Nijercongo? Pasanho auta lical súrtoi Portugãda! Aio...
Niger-Congo / True-ADV 1sn-3sing.acc-cold prefer-punc.telic akin-durative-atelic Portuguese / [Surprise-and-dismay particle] Niger-Congo? Honestly, I was hoping it would sound more like Portuguese. Oh, dear...
Middle Tshyak traditional orthography: Yo rwet glaew klan purta le.
Middle Tshyak "grammarian" orthography: Yoe roet kyaew kyán púut le.
Middle Tshyak transcription: [jø̄ ɻø̄t̚ kjɛ̄w kján púːt̚ lē]
Old Tshyak orthography: Yo glaew rwet rklan purtugeh.
Old Tshyak transcription: [jo glɛw ɻwet̚ ɻəklan puɻtugeh]
It looks somewhat like Portuguese.
Last edited by Travis B. on Mon Mar 28, 2016 12:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Middle Tshyak traditional orthography: Bey nu gu nda le yo khrow glaew klan nay jer khaong go n'gya njum may.
Middle Tshyak "grammarian" orthography: Pey nu-qu-da le yoe khów kyaew kyán nay-tsyee-qháong-ko ja dzyum may.
Middle Tshyak transcription: [pēj nūqūdā lē jø̄ kʰów kjɛ̄w kján nājtɕēːqʰɔ́ŋkō ɟā dʑūm māj]
Old Tshyak orthography: Bey nu gu nda yo glaew khrow rklan nay jer khaong go njum.
Old Tshyak transcription: [bej nu gu nda jo glɛw kʰɻow ɻəklan naj dʑeɻ kʰɔŋ go ndʑum]
Only the name Nhugunda looks Niger-Congo to me.
My first sentence in the new iteration of my conlang Alaia:
Orthography: IULLA1-la MREUS1-us JUNU-JUNU-as LU-ur a-TRILLU-li (<- think of Akkadian)
Pronunciation: /julːa mreus eieas lur atrilːi/
Segmentation: julla-0 mreus-0 eje-as lu-r atrilli-0
Gloss: sun-NOM moon-NOM equal-ly 1-ACC observe-PRES
‘The sun and the moon observe us all the same.’
Serafín wrote:Orthography: IULLA1-la MREUS1-us JUNU-JUNU-as LU-ur a-TRILLU-li (<- think of Akkadian)
Pronunciation: /julːa mreus eieas lur atrilːi/
Segmentation: julla-0 mreus-0 eje-as lu-r atrilli-0
Gloss: sun-NOM moon-NOM equal-ly 1-ACC observe-PRES
‘The sun and the moon observe us all the same.’
Mi tingk it a nof fi soso ray di odatok, mos tok an glos, af no esplen dem say im. Olso, mos tok sayn yus [], no //.
I think it suffices to just write the translation, pronunciation and gloss, without explanations in front of them. Also, pronunciation is indicated by [], not //.
jal wrote:Mi tingk it a nof fi soso ray di odatok, mos tok an glos, af no esplen dem say im. Olso, mos tok sayn yus [], no //.
I think it suffices to just write the translation, pronunciation and gloss, without explanations in front of them. Also, pronunciation is indicated by [], not //.
Middle Tshyak traditional orthography: Sera ploy leng yae ak zram kae tsha yo khrow ngya mkhaew yae.
Middle Tshyak "grammarian" orthography: Sér pyóy leng yae ák sram káe tshá yoe khów nya gháew yae.
Middle Tshyak transcription: [séɻ pjój lēŋ jɛ̄ ʔák̚ ʂām kɛ́ tsʰá jø̄ kʰów ɲā gʰɛ́w jɛ̄]
Old Tshyak orthography: Seraphin ploy leng yae ak zram pkae tsha yo sn'gaew ngya khrow yae.
Old Tshyak transcription: [seɻapʰin ploj leŋ jɛ ʔak̚ ʐam pəkɛ tsʰa jo səŋgɛw ɲa kʰɻow jɛ]
I assume that Serafin knows this and that his phonology just is not ready.
Last edited by Travis B. on Tue Mar 29, 2016 11:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
also whatever 'pronunciation' can be vaguely indicated by //, for all we say that the signs indicating phonemes are arbitrary they clearly are not, a phonemic transcription gives a much better indication of pronunciation than the native script + direct transliteration and this is clearly what was intended
I mean we can rag on someone all day long for writing 'pronunciation' when what they meant was 'phonemic transcription' but quite what anyone gains from this is unclear
كان يا ما كان / يا صمت العشية / قمري هاجر في الصبح بعيدا / في العيون العسلية
Yng wrote:I mean we can rag on someone all day long for writing 'pronunciation' when what they meant was 'phonemic transcription' but quite what anyone gains from this is unclear
Yu kan soso "rag on" de fo yu imsef mek langwic, oda yu kan ol yu mos!
Yu can only "rag on" in your conlang, or you can shut up!
Middle Tshyak traditional orthography: May wira tsyao thre thraw je sngyak chaek gye ka ha?
Middle Tshyak "grammarian" orthography: May wuir tsyéo tsrhé tsrháw tsye hnyák tsyháek ce ká há?
Middle Tshyak transcription: [māj wȳɻ tɕœ́ tʂʰé tʂʰáw tɕē ɲ̊ák̚ tɕʰɛ́k̚ cē ká há]
Should I make New Tshyak agglutinative or isolating?
Mie'ze fer pas-de-pas l'onne joyeuse, si m'erre l'onne fer les beaux labours cec'ers beaux. ~ mi:ts psa: pa ta pa lun: s:uiu:s si ma: lun: psa: lai pau: lapul sasa pau: ~
>> 1.F-REFL make NEG-GEN-NEG DEF-one.F happy.F if 1-be.F DEF-one.F make DEF.P pretty.M work-P this-be.P pretty.M << I don't want to work at alllll.
Yowiki, nafisemuin muran... unlikable FEM-IMP-do INT
Unfortunately, I have a ton to do...
I generally forget to say, so if it's relevant and I don't mention it--I'm from Southern Michigan and speak Inland North American English. Yes, I have the Northern Cities Vowel Shift; no, I don't have the cot-caught merger; and it is called pop.