Sound Change Quickie Thread

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
User avatar
Jetboy
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jetboy »

finlay wrote:
Qwynegold wrote:
Jetboy wrote:The change would go: /t͡s d͡z t͡sˠ d͡zˠ t͡sʲ d͡zʲ/ > /t͡s d͡z t͡ʃ ʒ t͡x ɣ/, if that last one is even an actual affricate.
Nope.

I think /tsʲ dzʲ/ would rather result in either /tɕ ʑ/ or /tʃ ʒ/. But since you already have /tʃ ʒ/ from another source, I think /tɕ ʑ/ would quickly merge with them.
yeah, swap the palatalisation and velarisation and this would make sense. It looks to me like you've just got them back to front. /tx/ is plausible but i dunno if it's an "affricate".
Ah, oops, the result should have been /t͡s d͡z t͡x ɣ t͡ʃ ʒ/. But the larger part of my question would be if, going from that, it would be plausible for /t͡ʃ/ to assibilate to /ʃ/ while /t͡s/ and /t͡x/ remain as affricates.
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s

jmcd
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1034
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 11:46 am
Location: Réunion
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by jmcd »

Heterorganic affricates such as /tx/ aren't just plausible, they're attested in multiple Native American languages.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by finlay »

i just meant i dunno whether they're called "affricates"

CaesarVincens
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:26 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by CaesarVincens »

I'm trying to think of some interesting changes for palatalized consonants.

The beginning phonemes are
/p t k b d g/
/pp tt kk bb dd gg/
/pj tj kj bj dj gj/
/m n mj nj/
/s x sj xj/
/l r j w/

/ɪ eː e aː a oː o ʊ/

I've already decided to take /tj dj sj/ > /ʧ ʤ ʃ/. /nj/ might become /ɲ/ by analogy.

I'm thinking of having the voiceless long stops become aspirated and the voiced prenasalized, but I'm not sure what to do with palatalized labial and velar stops.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

CaesarVincens wrote:I'm trying to think of some interesting changes for palatalized consonants.
You could do what Tsakonian did and shift them all to palatals.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

CaesarVincens
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 204
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 7:26 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by CaesarVincens »

So all of /pj bj tj dj kj gj/ would be come /ʧ ʤ/ or /c ɟ/?

User avatar
Jetboy
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jetboy »

Palatalized labials usually just reject the palatalization and become plain labials; when they don't, I think the most frequent outcome is for them to become dental. As for the velars, they would probably become palatal, though where they go from there varies; they could maybe end up as alveolar affricates or fricatives?
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s

User avatar
äreo
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 326
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 10:40 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by äreo »

How about a change of /zʷu zʷy zʷi ʋu ʋy ʋi/ > /zʷ̩ zʷ̩ z̩ ʋ̩ ʋ̩ ʋ̩/?

Ascima mresa óscsma sáca psta numar cemea.
Cemea tae neasc ctá ms co ísbas Ascima.
Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho. Carho.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

^ I don't see why not.
Jetboy wrote:Palatalized labials usually just reject the palatalization and become plain labials; when they don't, I think the most frequent outcome is for them to become dental.
There's a lang somewhere that shifted them to linguolabials.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

sirdanilot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by sirdanilot »

I thought linguolabials had something to do with certain tribes that had the habit of removing front teeth...? They are, in any case, not common. Though it would be cool to have them in your lang and get away with it !

User avatar
ná'oolkiłí
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by ná'oolkiłí »

Similarly, I've read somewhere (I think in a description of Tlingit) that labialless inventories might be able to be traced back to the custom of wearing ornate lip jewelery.

User avatar
dhok
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by dhok »

ná'oolkiłí wrote:Similarly, I've read somewhere (I think in a description of Tlingit) that labialless inventories might be able to be traced back to the custom of wearing ornate lip jewelery.
I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

dhokarena56 wrote:
ná'oolkiłí wrote:Similarly, I've read somewhere (I think in a description of Tlingit) that labialless inventories might be able to be traced back to the custom of wearing ornate lip jewelery.
I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?
Yes. This kind of stuff has nothing to do with how a groups language evolves.

User avatar
Zaris
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:54 pm
Location: San Antonio, Texas

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zaris »

What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system?

Code: Select all

i               u
i˞              u˞
e̞      ə      o̞

        a
        a˞
                   
I was thinking something like [əi]>[ɨ]

User avatar
Jetboy
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jetboy »

Zaris wrote:What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system?

Code: Select all

i               u
i˞              u˞
e̞      ə      o̞

        a
        a˞
                   
If the low vowel is more back, it could trigger a chain shift, pushing historic /u/ to /ʉ/, and /o/ to /u/; /ʉ/ could then unround to /ɨ/. However, this isn't exceedingly plausible, because there just aren't that many vowels; possibly there was originally a front low vowel, and the back low vowel would raise to /o/ and the front be pulled back to /a/? Maybe?
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Bob Johnson »

Zaris wrote:What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system? [...] I was thinking something like [əi]>[ɨ]
/ə/ > [ɨ] in certain contexts would make sense, yes; stressed syllables, high tone, or separated from an /i/ by some single consonants (i.e., umlaut).

User avatar
ná'oolkiłí
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by ná'oolkiłí »

dhokarena56 wrote:I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?
Didn't say that it was good or plausible explanation...

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

ná'oolkiłí wrote:
dhokarena56 wrote:I take issue with that. Aren't there tribes in Papua New Guinea that also have ridiculous lip discs and stuff but still have /p b m/?
Didn't say that it was good or plausible explanation...
Then...why...?

TaylorS
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 557
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by TaylorS »

How about /pˤ/ > /qʷ/?

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

What are the intermediate steps?

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

sirdanilot wrote:I thought linguolabials had something to do with certain tribes that had the habit of removing front teeth...? They are, in any case, not common. Though it would be cool to have them in your lang and get away with it !
Interdentals, then?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Qwynegold
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:34 pm
Location: Stockholm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Qwynegold »

Zaris wrote:What is a good way to incorporate [ɨ] into a language from a proto-language with the following vowel system?

Code: Select all

i               u
i˞              u˞
e̞      ə      o̞

        a
        a˞
                   
I was thinking something like [əi]>[ɨ]
i˞ > ɨ˞ > ɨ
Image
My most recent quiz:
Eurovision Song Contest 2018

TaylorS
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 557
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by TaylorS »

roninbodhisattva wrote:What are the intermediate steps?
None, really. The plosive MOA and the pharyngealization influence each other to give /q/ and the labial POA gives the labialization

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by roninbodhisattva »

Any reason why...

i > e / s_

...couldn't be a really odd conditioned sound change?

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Bob Johnson »

Avoidance of /si/ → /ʃi/ for some reason? As in, they'd rather preserve the /s/ than the /i/. I'm more familiar with vowels causing consonants to change, though.

What other vowels do you have?

Post Reply