I'm glad you enjoyed it dunomapuka and Corumayas

One thing that I hoped is that our discussions and thought that went towards making the presentation would also help the project directly as well. Thinking lots about what has worked and what hasn't should hopefully point us towards what we might be able to change in the way we do things in future as well. The todo list resulted from those planning conversations, so that's happened a little already!
On an unrelated note, I started work on some SCs for Nualis. They're not quite right yet - a little too innovative, as I had in mind that phonologically the Nualis-Takuna family would generally be extremely conservative. Anyway, I remembered Basilius and Qwynegold's work on an NT daughter a couple of years ago, and so went and re-checked that out. It has set me thinking - the daughterlang they discuss there is extremely innovative in various ways (/is at great time depth) and I seemed to be going in a more innovative direction with Nualis than I'd planned. Perhaps what's needed here is some intermediate proto langs for the NT family, to avoid the wild-random-jumps effect of the later Daiadak family. At its simplest it might look something like this -
Code: Select all
PNT
|
|
|
---------------------
| |
| |
| |
Proto-Southern-NT Proto-Northern-NT
| |
| |
| |
---------------- Innovative Northern langs
| |
| |
| |
Takuna Nualis
But obviously things could be rather more convoluted if people wanted - really, the Southern grouping should split (before splitting into N and T) into Coastal and Continental (N and T being part of the Coastal subfamily). Also - and this is true regardless of whether we do some in-between langs like the above - it doesn't make much sense the family being called Nualis-Takuna when N and T are languages on just one branch, and there is a much higher branching subfamily. So either they should be on different branches and the third branch should contribute a name too, making it Nualis-Takuna-X, or the description of people-movements could be changed a bit and Nualis could be in the Northern subfamily, or the whole family could be renamed altogether.
Another problem that occurred to me is that the Siixtaguna culture is an immigrant culture, in historical terms fairly new to the Siixtaguna coast and nearby islands (having migrated from some unspecified place in the east, presumably Tuysafa). The Takuna are slightly farther from their original homeland than the Nualis, and so it would make sense that their language is more conservative (such is the typically observed pattern); but the proposed Northern grouping would probably be rather further from the homeland and yet linguistically is massively more innovative. One possibility here would be to change the currently Northern subfamily into being the aforementioned Continental subfamily, which was the result of an earlier wave of migration and so might well be more different to N and T than they are to each other whilst occupying a similar area. But I don't know how much planning Basilius and Qwynegold had done around the culture and history of their potential daughterlang? I'm afraid I haven't read through that entire thread yet
Anyway, I would welcome people's opinions and if anyone else is also interested in renewing work on this family, do let me know!