Why are /p f/ grouped with the fortis (ejective?) consonants?sirdanilot wrote:I've been working for quite a while on this language lately (already quite far into morphology). However I was opposed to creating an entire thread for just another phonology. Then i found this thread.
Here it is. It has phoneme inventory, allophony, prosody/stress and whatnot for you guys to feast on.
edit: oh, and in the consonant inventory, /c/ should be /x/.
Post your conlang's phonology
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
How do i post code graf with perfect alignment
Last edited by Xados on Fri Jun 03, 2011 11:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
don't make it so big, and do it in Notepad, not the post box
or you could do it in Word or something and post a screenshot
or you could do it in Word or something and post a screenshot
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
p used to have an ejective counterpart...
Last edited by Xados on Sat Jun 04, 2011 8:48 am, edited 2 times in total.

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
-
sirdanilot
- Avisaru

- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
- Location: Leiden, the Netherlands
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
They derive from *p' and *f' (subsequently, historical *p and *f have become voiced /b/ and /v/, and historical *b and *v have become /v/ and /w/ (labiodental)). /X/ also derives from *x' or *X' (or, most probably, a merger of those two). Because syllables containing ejective consonants are stressed, syllables containing /p/ and /f/ are also stressed; this is why I grouped these consonants in with the ejectives, since it's phonologically relevant. There are also fortition processes in this lang, and /b/ might change to /p/, and /v/ to /f/.Nortaneous wrote:Why are /p f/ grouped with the fortis (ejective?) consonants?
This is no longer productive though, considering names like /pOlXas/ getting stress on the second syllable (stress on syllables with /X/ is still productive; it is always pronounced very harshly, back in the throat, making it resemble an ejective).
Fortis is just how I call the group with ejectives, /p/, /f/ and /X/, because ejective would be wrong with not all of them being ejective.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
Code: Select all
bilabial labiovelar labio-palatal labiodental alveolar alveo-velar medial palatal velar glottal
nasal n n nn ng
plosive t k g h
fricative p b f v s z ss zz q x r
approximant u y rr ll i
trill l
tap/flap d
lateralfric. c j
lateralappr. l
affricate cc jj sc zj consonants^ v
cc-tɬ sc-t∫ jj-dɮ zj-dʒ
vowels
a e i y o u
long /a/ /e/ /i/ /y/ /ø/ /u/
short /æ/ /ɛ/ /ɪ/ /ʏ/ /œ/ /ʊ/
any opinions?
Last edited by Xados on Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
What are medial /ss zz/?
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
medial is term i use for post alveolar because the word is to long and to similar too alveolar. medial is because it's midway between alveolar and palatal. the long vowels aren't distinguished from their short counterparts.
so now you understand-what's your opinion
so now you understand-what's your opinion
Last edited by Xados on Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
*shrugs* meh. I like smaller inventories that are less chocked full. It seems like you're just throwing in sounds to some extent to me.Xados wrote:So now you understand-what's your opinion
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
okay, i'll drop ss,zz,zj,ng, and sc

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
Your chart is kinda big and hard to read, you put r and x in the glottal section which I can only assume is uvular. It does kind of seem like you have too many phonemes there, and if you want to keep all of them you could always explain a lot of them with heavy allophony.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
l and n both have allophones [-2]
i dropped 5 already [-7]
i use g for proper and foreign words [-8]
h can be silent [-9]
the semivowels are allophones [-12]
33-12= 21
that's as much as italian
i dropped 5 already [-7]
i use g for proper and foreign words [-8]
h can be silent [-9]
the semivowels are allophones [-12]
33-12= 21
that's as much as italian
Last edited by Xados on Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:16 am, edited 3 times in total.

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
he seems to be trying to imitate portuguese's <r> for /h/.....
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
yes, brazillian's to be exact , while x comes from spanish mexico

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
Is this right?
Code: Select all
m n ɲ ŋ
p b t k g ʔ
f v s z ʃ ʒ x h ɦ
w ɥ ɹ ɫ j
r
4
ɬ ɮ
l
ts dz tʃ dʒ
n n nn ng
p b t k g h
f v s z ss zz q
u y rr ll i
l
d
c j
l
cc jjSiöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
close, a few posts ago i dropped some some sounds and of they 33 phonemes-i am missing ts and dz. nice try though, currently i have 21 and a half full sounds
sorry for the last edition of this post
sorry for the last edition of this post
Last edited by Xados on Sat Jun 04, 2011 10:37 am, edited 2 times in total.

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
you really need to work on them there communication skills.
btw the portuguese <r> is a historical development that's hard to justify in a conlang. just use <h>... i really hate it when people use <h> for /ʔ/.
btw the portuguese <r> is a historical development that's hard to justify in a conlang. just use <h>... i really hate it when people use <h> for /ʔ/.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
truthfully, does anybody one here post with the mood of 'I WANT TO FUCKING KILL YOU'
it's always uh-huh or what?
it's always uh-huh or what?

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
i'll switch rr and r then, and i'm using silent h and aspirated h as a grammatical devicefinlay wrote:you really need to work on them there communication skills.
btw the portuguese <r> is a historical development that's hard to justify in a conlang. just use <h>... i really hate it when people use <h> for /ʔ/.

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
this makes absolutely no senseXados wrote:truthfully, does anybody one here post with the mood of 'I WANT TO FUCKING KILL YOU'
it's always uh-huh or what?
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
okay i'll rewrite for the sake of the forum

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
- Risla
- Avisaru

- Posts: 800
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:17 pm
- Location: The darkest corner of your mind...
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
*shakes fist*finlay wrote:...i really hate it when people use <h> for /ʔ/.
I use it in South Eresian. There's actually just a dialect-specific merger of /h ʔ/ in the dialect I use here, so I decided to represent all of them with <h> instead of apostrophes. Besides, it is attested (in the orthography I based mine off of, no less).
And what would you rather I do, blanket the language in apostrophes so it looks like it emerged from a bad fantasy novel?
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
Risla wrote:*shakes fist*finlay wrote:...i really hate it when people use <h> for /ʔ/.
I use it in South Eresian. There's actually just a dialect-specific merger of /h ʔ/ in the dialect I use here, so I decided to represent all of them with <h> instead of apostrophes. Besides, it is attested (in the orthography I based mine off of, no less).
And what would you rather I do, blanket the language in apostrophes so it looks like it emerged from a bad fantasy novel?
thank you-but i got the idea from french

I am also Zontas, for those of you wondering.
- Risla
- Avisaru

- Posts: 800
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:17 pm
- Location: The darkest corner of your mind...
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
hey, I'm depending my language, not yours. 
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Post your conlang's phonology
yeah, I think that's pretty common in Spanish-developed orthographies. Seri does it also, at least
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.


