Sound Change Quickie Thread

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Pole, the »

I don't think it's odd.
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zaarin »

Thanks.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

User avatar
StrangerCoug
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:56 pm
Location: El Paso, TX

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by StrangerCoug »

Suppose I have a conculture where a significant minority speaks a conlang (let's call it Language A for the purposes of this question) with a (C)V(C) syllable structure whose consonant inventory is pretty much Skolt Sami plus /ʔ θ ç h/, but has only /a ə ɨ/ for its phonemic vowels. It's in contact with speakers of the conculture's majority language (call it language B), which has /a e i ə ɨ o u/ for its vowel inventory and otherwise isn't structurally far off from SAE. What allophonic processes are plausible for Language A that might cause speakers of Language B to perceive backness distinctions that don't really exist in Language A? (In other words, what might cause Language B's speakers to hear Language A's /ə/ as closer to a Language B /e/ or /o/, and similarly for Language A's /ɨ/?)
Current avatar by malibupup of FurAffinity.

My conlangs on this site:
Proto-Wideriver

User avatar
Frislander
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:34 am
Location: The North

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Frislander »

StrangerCoug wrote:Suppose I have a conculture where a significant minority speaks a conlang (let's call it Language A for the purposes of this question) with a (C)V(C) syllable structure whose consonant inventory is pretty much Skolt Sami plus /ʔ θ ç h/, but has only /a ə ɨ/ for its phonemic vowels. It's in contact with speakers of the conculture's majority language (call it language B), which has /a e i ə ɨ o u/ for its vowel inventory and otherwise isn't structurally far off from SAE. What allophonic processes are plausible for Language A that might cause speakers of Language B to perceive backness distinctions that don't really exist in Language A? (In other words, what might cause Language B's speakers to hear Language A's /ə/ as closer to a Language B /e/ or /o/, and similarly for Language A's /ɨ/?)
Fronting when adjacent to palatals, rounding when adjacent to labials, backing adjacent to velars (less likely; I think this is attested but I'm not certain, it would certainly make sense).
https://frislander.tumblr.com/

First known on here as Karero

User avatar
mèþru
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1984
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:44 am
Location: suburbs of Mrin
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by mèþru »

Sounds that velar to glottal and in between tend to cause backing, while sounds that have some palatal quality tend to front. Labials cause rounding.

These are just tendencies though: Velars are less likely to cause backing than uvulars and other sounds further back, and think I saw at least one natlang grammar that said uvulars caused rounded front vowels!

[h] already exists as an allophone of /x/.

Here's an example I made up:
  1. After /p b m f v/ ⟶ [ɒ̈ ɵ̞ ʉ]
    Before /t d n t͡s d͡z t͡ʃ d͡ʒ s z θ ð r l/ ⟶ [ä ə ɨ]
    Before /ʃ ʒ j/ ⟶ [a e̞ i]
    Before /c ɟ ɲ ʃ ʒ ç ʝ ʎ/ ⟶ [ɛ e i2]
    Before /k ɡ ʔ ŋ x ɣ h w/ ⟶ [ɑ ɤ̞ ɯ]
    Before /w/ ⟶ [ɒ o̞ u]
    So now we have /ɨ/ [i i2 ɨ ʉ ɯ u], /ə/ [e e̞ ə ɵ̞ ɤ̞ o̞] and /ä/ [ɛ a ä ɒ̈ ɑ ɒ]
  2. After nothing ⟶ [ɪ i ɪ̈ ʊ̈ ɯ̽ u e e̞ ə ɵ̞ ɤ̞ o̞ ɛ æ ä ɒ̈ ɑ ɒ]
    After /p b t d k ɡ ʔ/ ⟶ [i i ɨ ʉ ɯ u e e ɘ ɵ ɤ o ɛ æ ɐ ɞ̞ ʌ̞ ɔ̞]
    After /c ɟ/ ⟶ [i i i y ɯ̈ ü e e e ø ɤ̈ ö ɛ æ æ ɶ̽ ɑ̽ ɒ̽]
    After /m n ŋ r l/ ⟶ [i̞ i ɨ ʉ ɯ u e e̞ ɜ ɞ ʌ ɔ ɛ æ ɐ ɒ̈ ɑ ɒ]
    After /ɲ/⟶ [i i y ɯ̈ ü e e ë ø̈ ɤ̞̈ ö̞ ɛ æ æ̈ ɶ ɑ̈ ɒ̈2
    After /t͡s d͡z t͡ʃ d͡ʒ s z ʃ ʒ f v θ ð x ɣ h/ ⟶ [i̞ i ɪ̈ ʊ̈ ɯ̽ ʊ e̞ e̞ ɜ ɞ ʌ ɔ æ a ä ɒ̈ ɑ ɒ]
    After /ʃ ʒ ç ʝ j ʎ/ ⟶ [i ɪ ʏ ɯ̽ ʊ e e ë ø̈ ɤ̞̈ ö̞ ɛ a a ɶ ɑ̈ ɒ̈2
    After /w/ ⟶ [i̞ i ɪ̈ u u u e̞ e̞ ɜ ɔ ɔ ɔ æ a ä ɒ ɒ ɒ]
  3. Assume [i ɨ y ɪ ʏ ɪ̈ e ø ë ø̈ ɘ e̞ ə ɛ ɜ æ æ̈ a ä] as Group 1 and the other values as Group 2
    All vowels in Group 2 become Group 1 vowels if the first vowel of the word is a Group 1 vowel and vice versa
  4. Language B borrows the word
    [i y ɨ ʉ ɯ̈ ü ɯ u ɪ ʏ ɪ̈ ʊ̈ ɯ̽ ʊ e ø ë ø̈ ɘ ɤ̈ ö ɤ o e̞ ə ɵ̞ ɤ̞̈ ö̞ ɤ̞ o̞ ɛ ɜ æ æ̈ ɶ̽ ɐ ɞ̞ ɑ̽ ɒ̽ ʌ̞ ɔ̞ a ɶ ä ɒ̈ ɑ̈ ɒ̈2 ɑ ɒ] ⟶ /i i~u ɨ u ɨ u i u ɨ u ɨ u ɨ u e ə e~ə ə ə ə o ə o e ə ə ə o e ə ä ä ə ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä/
Last edited by mèþru on Sat Sep 16, 2017 5:38 pm, edited 4 times in total.
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť

User avatar
StrangerCoug
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 269
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:56 pm
Location: El Paso, TX

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by StrangerCoug »

mèþru wrote:[h] already exists as an allophone of /x/.
I had intended /h/ and /x/ to be separate phonemes, but hey, maybe they merge at some point :P

Edited to add: Or even better, Language B speakers can't hear the difference between /x/ and /h/ and they get merged when it makes it way over to Language B. I'm not willing to say no...
Current avatar by malibupup of FurAffinity.

My conlangs on this site:
Proto-Wideriver

User avatar
mèþru
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1984
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:44 am
Location: suburbs of Mrin
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by mèþru »

Edited post
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť

User avatar
Frislander
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 836
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 6:34 am
Location: The North

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Frislander »

When it comes to bilabial trills, I know they can originate from /b/ before rounded vowels and from /mb/ clusters, but does the alternative origin of bilabial stop + flap/trill sound reasonable as well?
https://frislander.tumblr.com/

First known on here as Karero

User avatar
mèþru
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1984
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:44 am
Location: suburbs of Mrin
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by mèþru »

Sure
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť

User avatar
احمکي ارش-ھجن
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by احمکي ارش-ھجن »

How would I be able to make /ɹ̩/ and /az/ cognates?
ʾAšol ḵavad pulqam ʾifbižen lav ʾifšimeḻ lit maseḡrad lav lit n͛ubad. ʾUpulasim ṗal sa-panžun lav sa-ḥadṇ lav ṗal šarmaḵeš lit ʾaẏṭ waẏyadanun wižqanam.
- Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Cedh
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:30 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Cedh »

احمکي ارش-ھجن wrote:How would I be able to make /ɹ̩/ and /az/ cognates?
Language A: *əz > əɹ > ɹ̩
Language B: *əz > az

Porphyrogenitos
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:13 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Porphyrogenitos »

Most lenitions of /s/ seem to take /z/ or /h/ as initial pathways; i.e.

/s/ > /h/ > /∅/
/s/ > /z/ > /ʐ/ or /r/ or /ɹ/

Can anyone think of any other outcomes for lenited /s/, or any other initial pathways? Especially in a voiced environment?

User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Pole, the »

How would you approach the following ones?

/k/ → /tsk/ // V[+short]_{a o u}, V[+short]_$
/k/ → /ts/ // _{a o u}
/θ/ → /tx/
/ks/ → /x/
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

User avatar
Soap
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: Scattered disc
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Soap »

Pole, the wrote:How would you approach the following ones?
/θ/ → /tx/
θ ---> ṭ (dental) ---> t (known from some AmEng dialects) ---> tʰ ----> tx
Any preeixisting /t/ would have to be sheltered from the change by a Duke-of-York sound shift, since /tx/ without bare /t/ would be very peculiar.
/ks/ → /x/
Similar. ks----> kx ("strongly aspirated" ) -----> x


Others not likely without similar shifts affecting /k/ in other environments. How big is the pohonology?
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image

User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Pole, the »

Soap wrote:Others not likely without similar shifts affecting /k/ in other environments. How big is the pohonology?
It looks roughly like that:
/m n/
/p b t d (tʃ) k ɡ/
/f v (θ) s z (ʃ) x/
/l r j w/

Later on, /tʃ ʃ/ → /tʃˠ ʃˠ/ → /tsx sx/.

Edit:
Would it be plausible to have /θ/ → (fortition) /tθ/ → /tx/ instead?

And also /k ɡ/ → /kː ɡː/ // [V+short]_ → (dissimilation) /tk dɡ/ → /tsk dɡ/?
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

Zju
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 243
Joined: Tue May 08, 2012 11:10 am

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Zju »

Pole, the wrote:
Soap wrote:Others not likely without similar shifts affecting /k/ in other environments. How big is the pohonology?
It looks roughly like that:
/m n/
/p b t d (tʃ) k ɡ/
/f v (θ) s z (ʃ) x/
/l r j w/

Later on, /tʃ ʃ/ → /tʃˠ ʃˠ/ → /tsx sx/.

Edit:
Would it be plausible to have /θ/ → (fortition) /tθ/ → /tx/ instead?

And also /k ɡ/ → /kː ɡː/ // [V+short]_ → (dissimilation) /tk dɡ/ → /tsk dɡ/?
How about /kː ɡː/ → /t͡ʃk d͡ʒg/ // [V +front]_, followed by /t͡ʃ d͡ʒ/ → /t͡s d͡z/? You don't need intermediate steps for /tʃ ʃ/ → /tsx sx/, [t͡s] and [t͡ʃ] are in free variation in some Dravid language I can't remember.





Given that vowels have inherent slight tone differences - going from highest to lowet [ɛ] [a] [ɔ] - how likely is that tone difference of a second unstressed vowel turning into pitch accent, while the vowels themselve reducing to [ɪ] [ɐ] [ʊ]? A quite common word type is CV(J)CV, stress is on first syllable.

User avatar
Tropylium
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: Halfway to Hyperborea

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Tropylium »

احمکي ارش-ھجن wrote:How would I be able to make /ɹ̩/ and /az/ cognates?
Boring but straightforward version: /ɹ̩/ < *ɹ̩z > /az/.
Porphyrogenitos wrote:Can anyone think of any other outcomes for lenited /s/, or any other initial pathways? Especially in a voiced environment?
Nganasan has /j/ as the voiced alternant of /s/ (the other pairs are /h/ : /b/, /t/ : /ð/, /k/ : /g/). This is from earlier palatal *ś, though.
Pole, the wrote:/k ɡ/ → /kː ɡː/ // [V+short]_ → (dissimilation) /tk dɡ/ → /tsk dɡ/?
Geminate dissimilation is not really a thing that happens.

For a bit more of a roundabout, this should be workable: kː gː > ʰkː ɠ > hk ʔg > hk ɦg > xk ɣg > çk ʝg > tɕk dʑg > tsk dg.
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]

User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Pole, the »

Tropylium wrote:
Pole, the wrote:/k ɡ/ → /kː ɡː/ // [V+short]_ → (dissimilation) /tk dɡ/ → /tsk dɡ/?
Geminate dissimilation is not really a thing that happens.
It might be anecdotal, but Polish miękki, lekki → dialectal/colloquial miętki, letki.
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

User avatar
mèþru
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1984
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2015 6:44 am
Location: suburbs of Mrin
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by mèþru »

What about
kː ɡː → k.k ɡ.ɡ → t.k d.ɡ

Although I think that either both voiced and voiceless plosives should affricate or neither do.
ìtsanso, God In The Mountain, may our names inspire the deepest feelings of fear in urkos and all his ilk, for we have saved another man from his lies! I welcome back to the feast hall kal, who will never gamble again! May the eleven gods bless him!
kårroť

Vijay
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2244
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 3:25 pm
Location: Austin, TX, USA

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Vijay »

I think I could see that happening.

User avatar
Soap
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: Scattered disc
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Soap »

Pole, the wrote: Would it be plausible to have /θ/ → (fortition) /tθ/ → /tx/ instead?
?
yes, I should've thought of that first,sorry.

I'm on phone only for time being,sorry for messy typing.
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image

User avatar
ˈd̪ʲɛ.gɔ kɾuˑl̪
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 11:11 pm
Location: Łódź

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by ˈd̪ʲɛ.gɔ kɾuˑl̪ »

Has there been recorded an unconditional change of [ɔ/o] to [œ/ø]?
In Budapest:
- Hey mate, are you hung-a-ry?

Porphyrogenitos
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2011 1:13 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Porphyrogenitos »

ˈd̪ʲɛ.gɔ kɾuˑl̪ wrote:Has there been recorded an unconditional change of [ɔ/o] to [œ/ø]?
More or less, yes, at least if it's part of a larger vowel system where there's another shorter/laxer o-like consonant. E.g. in some English varieties, such as the Baltimore dialect, /oʊ/ is fronted almost all the way to /øʊ/ or even /eʊ/. Meanwhile the shorter, laxer /ɔ/ stays behind. This is because long vowels tend to front or be raised.

User avatar
ˈd̪ʲɛ.gɔ kɾuˑl̪
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 255
Joined: Wed May 18, 2016 11:11 pm
Location: Łódź

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by ˈd̪ʲɛ.gɔ kɾuˑl̪ »

So, is there a possibility it'd become fronted without any other o-like vowel? I'm thinking of something similar to the change in French from to [y].
In Budapest:
- Hey mate, are you hung-a-ry?

User avatar
احمکي ارش-ھجن
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 516
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2013 12:45 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by احمکي ارش-ھجن »

What are ways to develop word-initial geminates of obstruents (although they would be phonetically realized as tense)? Looking mostly for /p t d k s/.
ʾAšol ḵavad pulqam ʾifbižen lav ʾifšimeḻ lit maseḡrad lav lit n͛ubad. ʾUpulasim ṗal sa-panžun lav sa-ḥadṇ lav ṗal šarmaḵeš lit ʾaẏṭ waẏyadanun wižqanam.
- Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

Post Reply