Sound Change Quickie Thread

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Drydic »

Tropylium wrote:
Drydic Guy wrote:
Tropylium wrote:
Atom wrote:
Wattmann wrote:How would one expect aspirate fricatives to arise?
A good article for this is here:http://cnrs.academia.edu/GuillaumeJacqu ... _from_Pumi
Whoa, that's an excellent paper. :D Brb, dumping info on Frathwiki…
Please give a link when you get done, for those of us who can't access that site.
Gonna be at http://www.frathwiki.com/Aspiration. Won't be done today, tho…
fair enough, much appreciated.
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
Pogostick Man
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 894
Joined: Sat Jul 25, 2009 8:21 pm
Location: Ohio

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Pogostick Man »

How plausible would C̥ʼ → C̬[+implosive] / V_V be?
(Avatar via Happy Wheels Wiki)
Index Diachronica PDF v.10.2
Conworld megathread

AVDIO · VIDEO · DISCO

Bristel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Miracle, Inc. Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Bristel »

Rorschach wrote:How plausible would C̥ʼ → C̬[+implosive] / V_V be?
Let me parse this for my own illumination:

How plausible is it for a devoiced or voiceless ejective consonant to become a voiced implosive consonant between vowels?
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró

Jana Masala
Niš
Niš
Posts: 10
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 4:36 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jana Masala »

How would I derive a series of pharyngealized (or velarized) labials? Something along the lines of:

p pˤ
b bˤ
m mˤ
ɸ ɸˤ
β w*

*Also, could /w/ have descended from /βˤ/—>/wˤ/—/w/?

----
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1418
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by ---- »

Perhaps sequences of uvulars+/w/, or something like that.

User avatar
Jetboy
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jetboy »

Jana Masala wrote:How would I derive a series of pharyngealized (or velarized) labials?
Perhaps contraction of neighboring vowels, with /a/ vowels triggering velarization on the proceeding consonant? Or the same thing but with apocope?
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s

User avatar
ná'oolkiłí
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 188
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by ná'oolkiłí »

Clusters with laterals? Apparently something like that happened in NWC languages.

User avatar
Qwynegold
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:34 pm
Location: Stockholm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Qwynegold »

I've been toying with a new idea for a group of related conlangs. (*sigh* I get too many ideas.) The phoneme inventory is similar to this for all of them:

/m n ɲ ŋ ŋʷ/
/p b t d tʷ dʷ k ɡ kʷ ɡʷ q (ɢ) ʡ ʔ/
/tɕ dʑ/
/ɸ f v s z sʷ zʷ ɕ ʑ x ɣ xʷ ʁ ʢ/
/l ɻ j ʟ w/
/ɨ ɐ/
(I was gonna get rid of ɢ, but forgot to make such a sound change. Now it's a little difficult, so I'll do that later...)

I'm not sure about stress, maybe it'll be penultimate.

In the proto-stage the syllable structure was CV(C), and a glottal stop was added at the end of a word utterance finally, if that word would otherwise have ended with a vowel. In the later stage of the language (where the phoneme inventory is what you see above), I would like the syllable to be CVC (no optional anything 8)). Do you think this would work?: First 0 > ʔ / V_# even when the word isn't utterance final, and then 0 > ʔ / V_CV as the epenthetic glottal stop keeps spreading like cancer. Or how about C > Cː / V_V for er... no apparent reason?
Image
My most recent quiz:
Eurovision Song Contest 2018

User avatar
Jetboy
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jetboy »

So, I've been trying something with nasal vowels recently, for the first time. The thing is, I'm not sure how to get rid of them. Is nasalization turning into length attested?
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s

User avatar
Herr Dunkel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: In this multiverse or another

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Herr Dunkel »

Jetboy wrote:So, I've been trying something with nasal vowels recently, for the first time. The thing is, I'm not sure how to get rid of them. Is nasalization turning into length attested?
Doubtfully, since nasal vowels mostly lower the formants of the cardinal vowels, not change their temporal quality - of course, compensatory lenghtening then denasalisation could leave you with nasal vowels.
sano wrote:
To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

Lithuanian?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Herr Dunkel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: In this multiverse or another

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Herr Dunkel »

Nortaneous wrote:Lithuanian?
Or that
sano wrote:
To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano

User avatar
Jetboy
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jetboy »

Anything else more interesting than depositing nasal consonants and denasalizing?
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s

User avatar
Herr Dunkel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: In this multiverse or another

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Herr Dunkel »

Jetboy wrote:Anything else more interesting than depositing nasal consonants and denasalizing?
Lowering in height, I guess.
Or, by rhinoglottophilia, I guess you could get some secondary articulation, though I'm no expert at this shit
sano wrote:
To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

nasal vowels are harder to distinguish than oral vowels, so you might have some mergers
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Cedh
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 938
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 10:30 am
Location: Tübingen, Germany
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Cedh »

You could have the nasalized vowels cause a mutation in adjacent consonants. Most obviously, plosives following a nasalized vowel could become prenasalized, but you could also have voiced plosives completely turn into nasals in Ṽ_ and/or _Ṽ positions (have a look at Guaraní nasal harmony for a natlang example). Something like that would also work with liquids and other approximants.

In the sound changes leading up to my conlang Tmaśareʔ, I have used both of the latter:
*nãbu > *nãmu > ... > nomo
*ɣũka > *ɰũka > *ŋũka > ... > ɲõka
*kʷẽdu > *kwẽnu > *kmẽnu > ... kmeno

User avatar
Jetboy
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 270
Joined: Sat Apr 17, 2010 6:49 pm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Jetboy »

Alright, thanks for the ideas!
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s

User avatar
Whimemsz
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Gimaamaa onibaaganing

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Whimemsz »

Nasal vowels are often as longer than corresponding oral short vowels (probably because they normally derive from V+N sequences, and in the course of nasalization become long by compensatory lengthening?). If your conlang lacks contrastive long vowels, you could have your nasal vowels, in the process of denasalization, become a new set of long vowels (or if you have a long set already, the nasalized vowels might merge with them rather than with the short vowels). Though this depends on the specific phonology of your language.

User avatar
Qwynegold
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:34 pm
Location: Stockholm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Qwynegold »

So anyone know about 0 > ʔ / V_CV or C > Cː / V_V?
Image
My most recent quiz:
Eurovision Song Contest 2018

Astraios
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2974
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:38 am
Location: Israel

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Astraios »

Qwynegold wrote:So anyone know about 0 > ʔ / V_CV or C > Cː / V_V?
The second one happened in Italian, at least to some consonants.

User avatar
Qwynegold
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 11:34 pm
Location: Stockholm

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Qwynegold »

Astraios wrote:
Qwynegold wrote:So anyone know about 0 > ʔ / V_CV or C > Cː / V_V?
The second one happened in Italian, at least to some consonants.
Damn, I've been looking and looking for details about that now, but the only thing I can find is this:
KneeQuickie wrote:Cj → CCj /V_V
Image
My most recent quiz:
Eurovision Song Contest 2018

suelior
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:32 pm
Location: S.Korea

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by suelior »

Would ħ > x be plausible with a language that also has χ and h?
also, I'd appreciate it very much if anyone would be so kind as to suggest a consonant that can be plausibly turned into /k/ and /l/.

User avatar
communistplot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 494
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2010 6:49 am
Location: La Ciudad de Nueva York
Contact:

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by communistplot »

So, I had an idea and I wished to know if it were plausible;
I have /s̞/ & /ɬ/ in a new conlang I'm working on and wish to turn them into /r/ &/s/ would

/s̞/ > /r̥/ > /r/
&
/ɬ/ > /s/

work out?

Also one other;

/x̞ʷ/ > /ɰʷ/ > /w/

Does that seem about right?

Thanks a bunch! ;D
The Artist Formerly Known as Caleone

My Conlangs (WIP):

Pasic - Proto-Northeastern Bay - Asséta - Àpzó

User avatar
dhok
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by dhok »

suelior wrote:Would ħ > x be plausible with a language that also has χ and h?
also, I'd appreciate it very much if anyone would be so kind as to suggest a consonant that can be plausibly turned into /k/ and /l/.
It's possible, of course, but I think there'd probably be a merger first. /χ ħ h/ doesn't strike me as entirely stable...

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread

Post by Nortaneous »

suelior wrote:also, I'd appreciate it very much if anyone would be so kind as to suggest a consonant that can be plausibly turned into /k/ and /l/.
/k͡ʟ̝̊/

alternatively:
1. r > l
2. r > gʟ > ɣ (both attested in Hiw) > x > k, or r > gʟ > g > k
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Post Reply