Sound Change Quickie Thread
- Hallow XIII
- Avisaru
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Under Heaven
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
congratulations, you have discerned the joke
陳第 wrote:蓋時有古今,地有南北;字有更革,音有轉移,亦勢所必至。
Read all about my excellent conlangsR.Rusanov wrote:seks istiyorum
sex want-PRS-1sg
Basic Conlanging Advice
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
If a language would have ʃ as its only sibilant fricative, would it shift to s? Or would it stay ʃ?
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
It could show allophony between those or others, e.g. /s/ realized as [s] before back vowels sand as [ʃ] before front vowels.
Japanese has /s/ with [ʃ] before i [ʃi] <shi>, iirc.
Japanese has /s/ with [ʃ] before i [ʃi] <shi>, iirc.
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
It could shift. But it doesn't hafta shift.Boehijt wrote:If a language would have ʃ as its only sibilant fricative, would it shift to s? Or would it stay ʃ?
- The Hanged Man
- Sanci
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:11 am
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
What would be a better (more likely) set of sound changes happening to diphtongs [ie] and [ue] in a language, that already has phonemic vowel length?
option #1:
ie → je
ue → we
option #2:
ie → jeː
ue → weː
option #1:
ie → je
ue → we
option #2:
ie → jeː
ue → weː
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Either one of them or the other.The Hanged Man wrote:What would be a better (more likely) set of sound changes happening to diphtongs [ie] and [ue] in a language, that already has phonemic vowel length?
option #1:
ie → je
ue → we
option #2:
ie → jeː
ue → weː
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
If you say [ie] is already a diphthong (namely [i̯e],... or do you mean [ie̯]??) in the first stage of that language, what changes exactly to [je], other than your transcription choice?
- The Hanged Man
- Sanci
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 3:11 am
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
@Thry: [ie] is a sequence of two vowels, resulting from disappearance of a consonant between them. My idea was to change it to a sequence of a glide and a vowel, with whole segment preserving length, or not. I think there is a difference between [ie] and [je], and if I remember correctly, I have also read somewhere on Wikipedia that vowel sequencies and vowel+glide sequencies may be considered different by language users. Perhaps I'm missing something...
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Sure, [i.e] and [i̯e]-[je] are different, that's just me being nitpicky - not on the representation, though, but on your calling it a diphthong, which is what struck me as weird.
In my opinion, here lengthening is plausible along with the diphthongization because of morae compensation, but of course it's not mandatory.
In my opinion, here lengthening is plausible along with the diphthongization because of morae compensation, but of course it's not mandatory.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Do we know any language that has tonic → [a] or [æ] while atonic → or [ɐ]?
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
...Eng...maybe English? In some dialect? Given intermediates xD?
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
It would be an interesting English dialect then! XDThry wrote:...Eng...maybe English? In some dialect? Given intermediates xD?
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
u > U > V > 6
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
u > əu > au > æu > æ
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
This is what I have for [u:] in my new conlang, yep.Nortaneous wrote:u > əu > au > æu > æ
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
There are more precedents for the long vowel option than the short vowel option, I think?Thry wrote:In my opinion, here lengthening is plausible along with the diphthongization because of morae compensation, but of course it's not mandatory.
The latter could happen too though, but it might make more sense if analyzed as syncope rather than a diphthong stress shift. Something like *ie > *[ije] > je?
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
How do you derive retroflex consonants, especially stops or affricates? Based on the RUKI-rule, I'm considering /kt/ > /ʈ/ or /ʈ͡ʂ/. How plausible is this?
BTW, the Wikipedia article on Yaqui says it has a coarticulated alveolar-velar stop /k͡t/, and that this sound “is found in many other Uto-Aztecan languages”. Do you know in which ones? Because I’ve searched in most of the Wikipedia articles about Uto-Aztecan languages (especially those closer to Yaqui) and can’t find it.
BTW, the Wikipedia article on Yaqui says it has a coarticulated alveolar-velar stop /k͡t/, and that this sound “is found in many other Uto-Aztecan languages”. Do you know in which ones? Because I’ve searched in most of the Wikipedia articles about Uto-Aztecan languages (especially those closer to Yaqui) and can’t find it.
Last edited by Benturi on Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Should be fine. Or t before back vowels, or Cr clusters.Benturi wrote:How do you derive retroflex consonants, especially stops or affricates? Based on the RUKI-rule, I'm considering /kt/ > /ʈ/ or /ʈ͡ʂ/. How plausible is this?
It's bullshit.BTW, the Wikipedia article on Yaqui says it has a coarticulated alveolar-velar stop /k͡t/, and that this sound “is found in many other Uto-Aztecan languages”. Do yo know in which ones? Because I’ve searched in most of the Wikipedia articles about Uto-Aztecan languages (especially those closer to Yaqui) and can’t find it.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Thanks!
The part about /k͡t/ in Yaqui too? Does this phoneme exist somewhere? Googling "alveolar-velar" wasn't very helpful, but I found out that, according to PHOIBLE, Nivaclé (Ashuslay) has a simultaneous alveolar/velar voiceless lateral fricative /ɬʟ̥͓/.Nortaneous wrote:It's bullshit.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
That could very easily just be an alveolar lateral fricative with velarization.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Seems unlikely being that there are no other velarized consonants in the inventory.
Also, the presence of /kɬ/ (for all intents and purposes, a coarticulated alveolar-velar lateral affricate) might suggest that a sequence /xɬ/ existed at some point. Later becoming /ɬʟ̥͓/...
Or some other batshittery. I don't see why you have to throw in velarization.
Also, the presence of /kɬ/ (for all intents and purposes, a coarticulated alveolar-velar lateral affricate) might suggest that a sequence /xɬ/ existed at some point. Later becoming /ɬʟ̥͓/...
Or some other batshittery. I don't see why you have to throw in velarization.
"To those who seek the solace of eternity, may journey down the river through the sacred Gates of Iss and find everlasting peace in the bosom of Issus"
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
The source is UPSID. It's described elsewhere as a plain lateral.
I'd bet the author of UPSID's source didn't do any articulatory analysis, though I can't find it (and it's in Spanish anyway) so I can't say for sure.
I'd bet the author of UPSID's source didn't do any articulatory analysis, though I can't find it (and it's in Spanish anyway) so I can't say for sure.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
English has no other velarized consonant than [ɫ]...and not even that one all the time in every dialect. Polish too, before ł shifted to [w].Quantum wrote:Seems unlikely being that there are no other velarized consonants in the inventory.
Also, the presence of /kɬ/ (for all intents and purposes, a coarticulated alveolar-velar lateral affricate) might suggest that a sequence /xɬ/ existed at some point. Later becoming /ɬʟ̥͓/...
Or some other batshittery. I don't see why you have to throw in velarization.
People get hung up on there being series of <insert articulation here> in a language...sure that's the most common, but it doesn't mean instances of one (or two) of a given articulation in a language are all but nonexistent.
Last edited by Drydic on Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
What can be done to create (and later dispose of) pharyngealisation of consonants? I have a couple of ideas, but are they any good, and how many alternatives are there?
I have one idea for pharyngealising consonants:
tC > ʕC or ʔC > Cˤ
I could use other voiceless stops in addition to /t/.
As for getting rid of pharyngealised consonants, I've had fewer ideas. Is it possible for them to become unconditionally voiced? How likely is it that they'll simply merge into their non-pharyngealised counterparts?
I have one idea for pharyngealising consonants:
tC > ʕC or ʔC > Cˤ
I could use other voiceless stops in addition to /t/.
As for getting rid of pharyngealised consonants, I've had fewer ideas. Is it possible for them to become unconditionally voiced? How likely is it that they'll simply merge into their non-pharyngealised counterparts?
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Sound Change Quickie Thread
Where did t voice?