Simplistic auxlang

Substantial postings about constructed languages and constructed worlds in general. Good place to mention your own or evaluate someone else's. Put quick questions in C&C Quickies instead.
User avatar
Bryan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:50 am
Location: Middlesex, England
Contact:

Re: Simplistic auxlang

Post by Bryan »

Imralu wrote:
Skomakar'n wrote: The point is that I don't want dialects in this type of language.
That wouldn't be a dialect. That would just be an accent. If you invent an IAL, you have to expect people to bring traces of their L1 phonology with them. People will have accents, no matter how minimalist your phonology.
Indeed.

I mean, Sko, make it how you want, it's just that I never really understood auxlangers who were overly fussy ('oh, it must be pronounced like the 'r' in French, nothing else will do!').

As Imralu says, dialect and accent are not the same, and I don't think an auxlang with only one accent is reasonable; if people use your language, they'll just ignore you.

Ditto everything else Imralu says, too.

User avatar
Skomakar'n
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1273
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 8:05 pm

Re: Simplistic auxlang

Post by Skomakar'n »

Indeed. All of that is very true. The smaller the phonology, the less room for error (yes; error), though.
sano wrote:Why not /l/?
Same reason as avoiding /r/.

@Imralu:
I'm less concerned about small differences in those sounds, though, and yes; I'm being very inconsistent in my thinking. A mispronounced rhotic (or lateral) just so happens to be a lot worse than a lot of other consonants, in my ears. English people are going to butcher the vowels, turning them all into diphthongs, no matter what, and the only way to avoid it would be to have no vowels, and that doesn't seem like a good solution. A rhotic can be easily thrown out, on the other hand.
Online dictionary for my conlang Vanga: http://royalrailway.com/tungumaalMiin/Vanga/

#undef FEMALE

I'd love for you to try my game out! Here's the forum thread about it:
http://zbb.spinnwebe.com/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=36688

Of an Ernst'ian one.

User avatar
Bryan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:50 am
Location: Middlesex, England
Contact:

Re: Simplistic auxlang

Post by Bryan »

Hi Skomakar'n, I've been working on a similar project for ten years or more now. Indeed, I believe we may have vaguely discussed these projects before. Here are some of my basic criticisms.
they are often mangled beyond recognition
Uh-ho. What is the point of using them if they are mangled beyond recognition?

I love that the sound system is so simple. Most auxlangers really just can't grasp the bull by the horns and do what needs to be done -- hacking out our beloved Standard Average European phonemes! But perhaps you've overdone it a tad. In any case, check out Maori for an example of how foreign (English) roots can be incorporated into such a minimalistic sound system (although Maori obviously has ten (IIRC) consonants). (C)V: great.

Nouns always end in "a"? Adjectives always end in "u"? Noooooooooo. Even Esperanto, the mother of this notion, hates it, as many Esperantists drop the final vowels for "poetry" and wherever else needed.

Also, perhaps it's just me, but I don't see what is uninteresting about your language. I think it's pretty interesting!

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Simplistic auxlang

Post by jal »

Hey Bryan,

Why are you necromancing a four year old thread? Also, Sho hasn't been seen around these parts for years...


JAL

User avatar
Bryan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 134
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:50 am
Location: Middlesex, England
Contact:

Re: Simplistic auxlang

Post by Bryan »

Hi Jal.

I ran a search on "auxlang". This was one of the first threads to come up. I got juiced up, posted. Quickly realised it is an old thread and I had already posted in it!

= FAIL.

Post Reply