Thought I'd post a bit of an update here. I've updated the aspectual system of Naduta, so I will explain it here.
Naduta has three inherent lexical aspects, and four morphological aspects. I have named the lexically determined aspects
active,
frequentative, and
stative. The morphological aspects are
simple,
delimitative,
imperfect I, and
imperfect II. The lexical aspects are named after the way they behave in the imperfect.
Active verbs are fairly self-explanatory in that they indicate actions in general. They cannot use imperfect II.
Frequentative verbs are identical to active verbs in the simple aspect, but the delimitative and imperfect I indicate multiple repetition of an action rather than a single, prolonged action.
Stative verbs are also self-explanatory. They represent an inherently imperfect state.
The
simple aspect indicates habitual or recurring actions, much like English, and is also the most common way of indicating future events (though in fact any aspect can indicate future, as there is no future tense).
The
delimitative aspect indicates non-permanent events that are occurring for a short or limited time. Stative verbs cannot use the delimitative.
The
imperfect I is used for events that have been continuing for a significant length of time. The focus is on the length of time rather of the action than the temporary nature of the action. For active verbs, this indicates a single, protracted action, while for frequentative verbs it indicates repetition of the same action. Stative verbs do not take the imperfect.
The
imperfect II is specifically for states that have been continuing for a significant length of time. Active verbs cannot be used in this aspect. For frequentative verbs, it refers to the continuation of a single iteration of the action, and the state of stative verbs. Essentially, the imperfect II for frequentative and stative verbs is the same as the imperfect I for active verbs.
The delimitative is formed by compounding with
phe- "to take"
The imperfect I is formed by compounding with
whir- "to touch/come in contact with"
The imperfect II is formed by compounding with
upu- "to be (somewhere)/exist (in some place)"
Here is a table:
Some example sentences:
Nasiih whe phurwa phegu.
[g=gate]nasi[/g] [g=KN.OBJ]-ih[/g] [g=near]whe[/g] [g=stand]phur[/g] [g=ADV]-wa[/g] [g=DLM]phe[/g] [g=1]-gu[/g]
I’m standing near the gate at the moment.
Nasiih whe upudarih wesrih teydurwa whirgu.
[g=gate]nasi[/g] [g=KN.OBJ]-ih[/g] [g=near]whe[/g] [g=be]upu[/g] [g=ATTR]-da[/g] [g=PL]-r[/g] [g=UKN.OBJ]-ih[/g] [g=bush]wes[/g] [g=PL]-r[/g] [g=UKN.OBJ]-ih[/g] [g=cut-down]teydur[/g] [g=ADV]-wa[/g] [g=IMPERF.I]whir[/g] [g=1]-gu[/g]
I’m cutting down bushes near the gate.
Nasiih whe upudaih wesih teydurwa upugu.
[g=gate]nasi[/g] [g=KN.OBJ]-ih[/g] [g=near]whe[/g] [g=be]upu[/g] [g=ATTR]-da[/g] [g=UKN.OBJ]-ih[/g] [g=bush]wes[/g] [g=UKN.OBJ]-ih[/g] [g=cut-down]teydur[/g] [g=ADV]-wa[/g] [g=IMPERF.II]upu[/g] [g=1]-gu[/g]
I’m cutting down a bush near the gate.
Notice in the last two examples that where in English the only change is from plural to singular, Naduta additionally requires a different verb conjugation.
WA, which we already saw in the first post is actually the character for "horn". Also the character for "fish", 
GU, is as you noticed used to write the 1st person ending -gu.
tah-.
tu
gi
ya-
yata, 
yan, 
yanta
MAN "but; however" employs a vertical stroke, even though the glyph 
ma is only ever used phonetically, as it is a simplification of the glyph 
MAS "door".
, 
pu- "undergo" is used as the default replacement for passive verbs.
–hi:
ke-, 
nhus-, 
–ki:
eh-, 
hiki- to do
apanhi- to manipulate; to adjust
buy-, 
buyhi- to follow along
biti-, 
bithi- to cover; to wrap
dephuni-, 
huu-, 
huwhi- to walk
su-, 
suthi- to fight
heme- 
-wun can; be able
-si want to
-pu must; have to
-rwha be likely to; be sure to
-tre may; be allowed to
-ga if
dephu- "to crawl" uses the phu glyph as a phonetic complement
khus- "time" uses the khu glyph as a phonetic complement
