The Official ZBB Quote Thread

Draenar · Post by **Draenar** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:02 am

Oooooooh... Weirdified.

Echobeats · Post by **Echobeats** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:42 am

Euskera wrote:Um. What happened to this page!?

Seconded.

EDIT: But page two is fine. Very weird. Has someone got some bizarre code in their sig?

Wycoval · Post by **Wycoval** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 11:14 am

I suspect it has something to do with the animated smiley in Khang's sig.

Echobeats · Post by **Echobeats** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:03 pm

Harple wrote:I suspect it has something to do with the animated smiley in Khang's sig.

It's always Khang's fault...

Trebor · Post by **Trebor** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 3:28 pm

In Dewrad's leaving thread, which exact title I can't remember, linguoboy wrote:
Trebor wrote:Damn, I didn't open this thread because of the title- I thought it would be a Dewrad-and-linguoboy thing.
It never would've worked out. I'm too old and lumpy for him, he's too young (and probably too slim) for me.

At least I'll always have my boomy!

Delalyra · Post by **Delalyra** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:07 pm

Oh, good...it's not just my computer. So...what did happen?

Tengado · Post by **Tengado** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:18 pm

I was wondering that to. And how did Euskera's "what happned comment" mange to be weird in a different way to the rest of the page?

Aren't computers wonderful?

Brel · Post by **Brel** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:46 pm

Tengado wrote:I was wondering that to. And how did Euskera's "what happned comment" mange to be weird in a different way to the rest of the page?

Because I'm a weird type of weird, obviously.

con quesa · Post by **con quesa** » Tue Nov 22, 2005 10:52 pm

This was from an #almea conversation when Cev was playing Final Fantasy VII's Battle Arena and whining on the channel about the status effects he was getting:

[20:02] Xephyr: shit i got toad
[20:02] lesbian_vampire_consultant: shoulda worn a white cape
[20:02] Xephyr: SHIT FUKC UC FUKC
[20:02] Xephyr: IMLM LOSIGN SO FUCKING MUCH
[20:02] lesbian_vampire_consultant: or whatever the thing is that prevents toad
[20:02] Xephyr: WHY TODD WHY FUCK WHY
[20:02] Xephyr: FUCIK
[20:03] lesbian_vampire_consultant: "WHY TODD WHY FUCK WHY"?
[20:03] Xephyr: WHY TOAD
[20:03] Xephyr: TOAD YOU IDIOT
[20:03] lesbian_vampire_consultant: I know, it just sounded funny
[20:03] Xephyr: FUKC UFRKC UFKC IM DYIGN
[20:04] * lesbian_vampire_consultant finds this really really funny
[20:04] Ketske: Hehe
[20:04] Xephyr: Heh
[20:04] Xephyr: I'm not
[20:04] Xephyr: YES
[20:04] Xephyr: YES
[20:05] Xephyr: YES
[20:05] Xephyr: BATTLES OVER
[20:05] Xephyr: I used 3 Fire Veils and a Swift Bolt
[20:05] Xephyr: Plus 4 X-Potions
[20:05] Xephyr: I hate Toad

"WHY TODD WHY FUCK WHY" just cracked me up.

LaughingMan · Post by **LaughingMan** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:25 am

Feijuada wrote:I can kill a man with a paper towel.

Brel · Post by **Brel** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:28 am

pharazon wrote:
Euskera wrote:I drew up some fanart (is that an oxymoron in this case?) of Ar-Pharaz?n recently
It would be an oxymoron not to be a fan!

*tears of mirth*

Shinali Sishi · Post by **Shinali Sishi** » Wed Nov 23, 2005 4:13 pm

Euskera wrote:
Tengado wrote:I was wondering that to. And how did Euskera's "what happned comment" mange to be weird in a different way to the rest of the page?
Because I'm a weird type of weird, obviously.

/me quotes that officially!

krinnen · Post by **krinnen** » Thu Nov 24, 2005 8:20 pm

Tengado in the ZBB Aliases Thread wrote:
Io wrote: I just checked my privates: it's Kamikaze Gargoyle.
Do your genitals usually correct your spelling?

Delalyra · Post by **Delalyra** » Sat Nov 26, 2005 11:44 am

From the "Language or Dialect?" thread in L&L:

Kolyn wrote:
Linguoboy wrote:
Rory wrote:The only time I really see linguists fretting about the definition of "language" is when they're asked the dangerous question of "how many languages are there?"
Exactly the kind of question that linguists consider moot but that the general public always seems to want a definite answer for.
Stupid general public.
/me burns the general public at the stake

graig · Post by **graig** » Mon Nov 28, 2005 6:52 pm

boomajoom wrote:
Twpsyn Pentref wrote:Oh, I like arguing. If anyone ever were to try to impose their half-baked ideas about language at me, I would shout at them with relish.
Mmmm...makes me hungry.

Ok, ok, let me try to be fancy. I'm going to use some words and tell me what you think.

When I testiculate in this mannerism, I'm prying to be a cunning linguist. My thought process is penetrating to the very ovarian of the issue in my hand. It's fellopian how completely vaginal people can be when it comes to their tongues. I pry my breastus to tease these people, but sometimes it gets so hard that my composition begins to pulsate rapaciously. Not to mention those people that complain because you fail to ejaculate your words with enough castration. And when they're wrong! Sometimes you just want to grab hold of their brigus and wank them into tomorrow...I swear, some of them need copies of See Dick 'n' Gina or something in order to truly be real master debators.

From shneyar

(Graigs childish sense of humour srtikes again...

)

Miekko · Post by **Miekko** » Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:40 am

Turtlehead wrote:
I have more interest in a language based on a real language than one pulled out of someones arse.

In this thread of eloquent arguments, high-quality conlanging and well-founded opinions of a priori conlangers' habits vis-a-vis their own arses.

graig · Post by **graig** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:37 am

?ge Kruger wrote:brunte, brunt?, c.f. Old French of the same:
A loud distraction.

Origin: A traditional song and dance routine performed by twelve musicians and dancers, each singing a different song in a different key to a different beat with different instruments wearing different costumes dancing different dances with the sole purpose of pestering market-goers.

From the Improbable Dictionary thread, Ephemera.

boomajoom · Post by **boomajoom** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 4:39 pm

I'm pleasured that Graig has kept a-breast on all the arousing statements that I've ejaculated lately. It's stimulating to know that he watches my testiculations with great vigor. Hopefully our future intercourses will stroke his fancy just as much.

Wycoval · Post by **Wycoval** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:10 pm

In The Improbable Dictionary, pg 2

?ge Kruger wrote:jeach /dZi:x/, an imaginary line around the waist that a dress kilt may not go past or below if it is to be worn correctly.

Jings Hamish! You'll have to pull your kilt down a bit, it's completely covering your jeach!

Origin: Scots Gaelic, "jubbly bits".

Shm Jay · Post by **Shm Jay** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:18 pm

Boomajoom, how is ?pry? a sexual word?

boomajoom · Post by **boomajoom** » Wed Nov 30, 2005 9:03 pm

Shm Jay wrote:Boomajoom, how is ?pry? a sexual word?

It can have certain connotations. Prying your fingers in a certain area, or prying your breastus.

Brel · Post by **Brel** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 2:43 am

chris_notts wrote:
Radius Solis wrote:
Turtlehead wrote:So who really pulls the strings in America?
Ultimately, nobody in particular. Instead, the strings all pull each other.
That's what we call a knot.

Shm Jay · Post by **Shm Jay** » Thu Dec 01, 2005 7:04 pm

boomajoom wrote: or prying your breastus.

How on earth can you pry breasts? Shove your fingers down the cleavage? They?re not shoved up together against each other.

(I can?t believe I?m asking boomajoom, of all people.)

캉탁 · Post by 캉탁 » Thu Dec 01, 2005 11:19 pm

캉탁 · Post by 캉탁 » Fri Dec 02, 2005 4:59 am