ZBB member photos, part 5. (Something for the weekend, sir?)

[Torco]

Also, no she's not 12... she was 12 in the photo... she looks like she might be... 14, even 16, which is way more permissible ¿

[Astraios]

If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.

Still not necessarily, because saying that you like men but would have sex with some women isn't the same as saying that you like men and women.

[finlay]

If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.

Still not necessarily, because saying that you like men but would have sex with some women isn't the same as saying that you like men and women.

Meh, getting too deep... I'd probably just call that bi anyway and be done with it. But personally i indulge in the occasional hypothetical with some women and am perfectly capable of appreciating their beauty (just not really with my dick).

[Dewrad]

Sounds like you're bi, then.

Disagree, because you can find (fe)males hot but still not particularly want to have sex with one.

If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.

of course, anyone can identify himself as whatever they want. just sayin'

That's a pretty significant part of it. As an example, I've had sex with a number of women, I've impregnated a woman, I still find women attractive, and I still get off on straight porn. But, in spite of all that, because I live in a monogamous, long-term relationship with another dude, I tend to describe myself as "gay", simply out of convenience. Of course, all of the foregoing might well make me "technically" bisexual, but it's just easier for all concerned if I just stick to "gay".

[rickardspaghetti]

We should get Dan Savage in here.

[MisterBernie]

We should get Dan Savage in here.

Eeeeh... last time I read him, he was still too doubtful of the existance of bisexuality for my tastes.

[rickardspaghetti]

That's not what he's saying here.

[MisterBernie]

That's not what he's saying here.

Hmm, that sounds kinda better than what I read back in the good old days, at least as far as bisexuality is concerned.

[patiku]

Here's a picture from the Baltimore ZBB meet (I'm the one in the middle).

Also here is a picture of my bookshelves that I took to impress the heck out of all of you.

[Torco]

Sounds like you're bi, then.

Disagree, because you can find (fe)males hot but still not particularly want to have sex with one.

If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.

of course, anyone can identify himself as whatever they want. just sayin'

That's a pretty significant part of it. As an example, I've had sex with a number of women, I've impregnated a woman, I still find women attractive, and I still get off on straight porn. But, in spite of all that, because I live in a monogamous, long-term relationship with another dude, I tend to describe myself as "gay", simply out of convenience. Of course, all of the foregoing might well make me "technically" bisexual, but it's just easier for all concerned if I just stick to "gay".

easier ?

[Queen Xalele]

Nah, dude, you're doing it wrong... you need to make it a lot more convoluted XD

As a homo who still thinks the female form can be alluring, I will join the calls of the silent minority in saying "I'd tap that".

Convoluted enough, teacher?

Sounds like you're bi, then.

Nah.

But in this case... I mean come on guys she's 12! Even though she looks 18, she's still 12!

To clear up confusion: I'm not twelve, but I was twelve in that last picture. I'm just amazed that I still look the same despite all the time that's passed.

[Ser]

I can think of one major exception for that hypothesis.

Who would that be? Serali? But wait, Serali's actually a guy...

[Simmalti]

Sounds like you're bi, then.

Labels exist for convenience. Besides isn't sexuality more like a gradient?

[Drydic]

I can think of one major exception for that hypothesis.

Who would that be? Serali? But wait, Serali's actually a guy...

That was either a) a rumor or b) a troll. No one can produce a screenshot (photoshopped or not).

[Dewrad]

Sounds like you're bi, then.

Disagree, because you can find (fe)males hot but still not particularly want to have sex with one.

If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.

of course, anyone can identify himself as whatever they want. just sayin'

That's a pretty significant part of it. As an example, I've had sex with a number of women, I've impregnated a woman, I still find women attractive, and I still get off on straight porn. But, in spite of all that, because I live in a monogamous, long-term relationship with another dude, I tend to describe myself as "gay", simply out of convenience. Of course, all of the foregoing might well make me "technically" bisexual, but it's just easier for all concerned if I just stick to "gay".

easier ?

Pretty much, yeah. Equally, if I were dating a woman I'd probably just describe myself as "straight". People prefer binary categories.

[pharazon]

If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.

of course, anyone can identify himself as whatever they want. just sayin'

That's a pretty significant part of it. As an example, I've had sex with a number of women, I've impregnated a woman, I still find women attractive, and I still get off on straight porn. But, in spite of all that, because I live in a monogamous, long-term relationship with another dude, I tend to describe myself as "gay", simply out of convenience. Of course, all of the foregoing might well make me "technically" bisexual, but it's just easier for all concerned if I just stick to "gay".

easier ?

Pretty much, yeah. Equally, if I were dating a woman I'd probably just describe myself as "straight". People prefer binary categories.

What if you're missing out on threesome opportunities though.

[Torco]

If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.
of course, anyone can identify himself as whatever they want. just sayin'

That's a pretty significant part of it. As an example, I've had sex with a number of women, I've impregnated a woman, I still find women attractive, and I still get off on straight porn. But, in spite of all that, because I live in a monogamous, long-term relationship with another dude, I tend to describe myself as "gay", simply out of convenience. Of course, all of the foregoing might well make me "technically" bisexual, but it's just easier for all concerned if I just stick to "gay".

easier ?

Pretty much, yeah. Equally, if I were dating a woman I'd probably just describe myself as "straight". People prefer binary categories.

What if you're missing out on threesome opportunities though.

Actually, that was my first concern as well. Bi chicks are hotter cause you picture yourself having sex with them and some other chick.

[Imralu]

Pretty much, yeah. Equally, if I were dating a woman I'd probably just describe myself as "straight". People prefer binary categories.

What if you're missing out on threesome opportunities though.

Yeah, because straight people never have threesomes.

[pharazon]

Pretty much, yeah. Equally, if I were dating a woman I'd probably just describe myself as "straight". People prefer binary categories.

What if you're missing out on threesome opportunities though.

Yeah, because straight people never have threesomes.

More limited ones!

[King of My Own Niche]

More limited ones!

It’s OK to put us in a three-way
It’s not gay when it’s in a three-way
With a honey in the middle there’s some leeway
The area’s grey in a one, two, three-way

(Credit where credit is due: Justin Timberlake, Andy Samburg, Lady Gaga on SNL)

[masako]

up against the wall

[Astraios]

Being searched by a security guard wearing an Invisibility Cloak?

[masako]

Being searched by a security guard wearing an Invisibility Cloak?

Discussing where to hang pictures on a newly painted wall.

[Simmalti]

sano looks insano


*rimshot*


*crickets*

[masako]

/ˈsano:/