Before:
After:


Less light, less colour!Shrdlu wrote:The guy in the front looks good, but the background... eh, it looks black'n'white.
I know, but I'm wondering if that kind of fake light doesn't have a nice, cinematic and surrealistic feel to it by bringing the character out of the background a bit. Shooting at dusk would be good, otherwise, but you don't have a long timespan to do that, and for an entire movie that plays out during night that would take so many days. Ugh. Anyway, this is just a test shooting for the real film to try out the possibilities. I should try using a greenscreen and compositing the character on a background too.Astraios wrote:No, it all looks bad. There's too much obvious light shining on his shirt, the leaves, the sky through the leaves... Just do it at nighttime.

While filming at night might be possible, you'd need a really good camera to get it to work. I don't advise adding the color filters unless you can remove the lighting because it looks horrible (trust me; I know from experience in filming and editing). And, yeah, you can see the character better, but I'd say that you should figure out first what you want from the scene: do you want realism or something that might be a bit more fantastical? If you're going for the latter, it might not be out of place to do so. But I don't advise it if at all possible.Skomakar'n wrote:I know, but I'm wondering if that kind of fake light doesn't have a nice, cinematic and surrealistic feel to it by bringing the character out of the background a bit. Shooting at dusk would be good, otherwise, but you don't have a long timespan to do that, and for an entire movie that plays out during night that would take so many days. Ugh. Anyway, this is just a test shooting for the real film to try out the possibilities. I should try using a greenscreen and compositing the character on a background too.Astraios wrote:No, it all looks bad. There's too much obvious light shining on his shirt, the leaves, the sky through the leaves... Just do it at nighttime.








nightmare fuelSkomakar'n wrote:Thanks!
This is a valid, and solid, criticism. I can only apologise for pandering to the current obscurantist fashion. In my defence, I have included a set of notes at the end of the poem which may (or may not) help - at this link.Astraios wrote:It's too confusing. It seems to be a story about one person, but then it seems to be about different people, but then it seems to be about the first person, but then about the fifth person, but then the first person again, and I couldn't read it properly. It's very pretty though.

sano wrote:To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano


Interesting.Rik wrote:This is a valid, and solid, criticism. I can only apologise for pandering to the current obscurantist fashion. In my defence, I have included a set of notes at the end of the poem which may (or may not) help - at this link.




That looks nothing like real nighttime. It does, however, look exactly like a professional day-for-night shot you'd see in an irl movie. So that's something I guess?Skomakar'n wrote:
protip: it doesn't look like anything in most camerasFeles wrote:Just take a photo at night and you will see how it looks.