Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:37 am
Who do you consider the US's mad racist party?Which is funny because it's true, pretty much every country has its mad racist party that annoys everyone else from there.
Page 55 of 116
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:42 pm
both of themEddy wrote:Who do you consider the US's mad racist party?Which is funny because it's true, pretty much every country has its mad racist party that annoys everyone else from there.
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:09 pm
Tea party
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:14 pm
Yeah, but do they really qualify as a party, strictly speaking? They seem more like the Republican Party's more enthusiastic wing.
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:28 pm
Eddy, Eddy, Eddy. Did you miss the entire shocking news that Tea Party candidate Christie O'Donnell defeated GOP candidate Mike Castle? Did you miss the huge discussion about how the Tea Party is threatening to take down the GOP's control of the Senate? However did you equate the Tea party to the GOP????????Eddy wrote:Yeah, but do they really qualify as a party, strictly speaking? They seem more like the Republican Party's more enthusiastic wing.
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:30 pm
he didn't. he said they were a proper subset.Viktor77 wrote:However did you equate the Tea party to the GOP????????
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:32 pm
see, for example, the fact that Ms. O'Donnell won the *Republican* primary
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:02 pm
*How everViktor77 wrote:Eddy, Eddy, Eddy. Did you miss the entire shocking news that Tea Party candidate Christie O'Donnell defeated GOP candidate Mike Castle? Did you miss the huge discussion about how the Tea Party is threatening to take down the GOP's control of the Senate? However did you equate the Tea party to the GOP????????Eddy wrote:Yeah, but do they really qualify as a party, strictly speaking? They seem more like the Republican Party's more enthusiastic wing.
and he's right (:!:) in the sense that tea partiers and republicans are pretty much the same, tea partiers simply being more vocal. And that I'm not sure whether they qualify as a party.
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:19 am
They are the right wing (or should we say the brainless wing?) of the Republican party. So no, they do not qualify as a party.finlay wrote:And that I'm not sure whether they qualify as a party.
JAL
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:52 am
QUOTE THREAD.
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:37 am
bulbaquil wrote:QUOTE THREAD.
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:53 am
""
QUOTES!
QUOTES!
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:49 pm
=DNeek wrote:""
QUOTES!
Posted: Thu Sep 23, 2010 5:54 pm
Neek wrote:""
QUOTES!
Posted: Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:16 pm
Berek wrote:Well, according to the Oprah crowd, Quantum Mechanics goes "we can't find an electron, so God owes me that dream house."linguofreak wrote:Believe me: The average person knows as little about physics as they do about linguists. They don't so much believe the old theories as they just get the new ones *horribly wrong*. They know just enough about Relativity and Quantum Mechanics to be dangerous, and probably don't know much more than the average medieval peasant about the more ho-hum areas of physics like conservation of momentum.
Posted: Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:59 am
Miekko wrote:Think, dammit, think!! It isn't that fucking hard.
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:01 pm
finlay wrote:houses?Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:29 pm
Torco wrote:If a woman sez size matter, I'm not arguing
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:38 pm
Because, for example, bridges don't need architects?Sleinad Flar wrote:finlay wrote:houses?Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:40 pm
And apparently neither do commercial buildings.Io wrote:Because bridges don't need architects?Sleinad Flar wrote:finlay wrote:houses?Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:38 pm
No, I believe those things need structural engineers.Viktor77 wrote:And apparently neither do commercial buildings.Io wrote:Because bridges don't need architects?Sleinad Flar wrote:finlay wrote:houses?Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:55 am
Salmoneus wrote: 1/10th of atheists prey at least weekly.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:06 am
so we're predators?Radius Solis wrote:Salmoneus wrote: 1/10th of atheists prey at least weekly.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:37 am
Salmoneus wrote:Because superstition can be shown to be false, at least theoretically.
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:10 pm
The elderly are the most deliciousTorco wrote:so we're predators?Radius Solis wrote:Salmoneus wrote: 1/10th of atheists prey at least weekly.
.