Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
[xɬpʼχʷɬtʰɬpʰɬːskʷʰt͡sʼ] is essentially the real-world analogue of Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
- Zumir
- Lebom

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
BTW, how the hell do you say it? Did Lovecraft himself ever give the pronunciation? If not, inventing creative phonologies for it could be fun. But anyway, we've gotten a bit off topic. We're supposed to be laughing at others hilarious ignorance, and it was damn fun.
Last edited by Zumir on Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Obviously it is unspeakable, and can only be vaguely approximated, by human mouths.Zumir wrote:BTW, how the hell do you say it? Did Lovecraft himself ever give the pronunciation? If not, inventing creative phonologies it could be fun.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
-
TomHChappell
- Avisaru

- Posts: 807
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2005 2:58 pm
Sal thinks this is offensive.
.
Last edited by TomHChappell on Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Risla
- Avisaru

- Posts: 800
- Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 12:17 pm
- Location: The darkest corner of your mind...
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I am suddenly overtaken by the urge to create a Cthulhulang.
- MisterBernie
- Avisaru

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:46 am
- Location: Oktoberfestonia
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Dooo eeeeet. And then, may you be eaten first
!
Constructed Voices - Another conlanging/conworlding blog.
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
/ɸʼŋlʊj ŋ͡ɡluʔnafχ kθʊɬʊ ʁʔʎeχ uɰaχʔnɑɡ̟͡ʟ̟̝ fχtaɰn/
[ʔʷŋʷlʷʊi̯ ŋ͡ɡlun̰afχ kθʊɬʊ‿ʁ ʎ̰eχ uwaχn̰aɡ̟͡ʟ̟̝ fχtaɰn]
/ɸʼŋlʊj ŋ͡ɡluʔnafχ kθʊɬʊ ʁʔʎeχ uɰaχʔnɑɡ̟͡ʟ̟̝ fχtaɰn/
[ʔʷŋʷlʷʊi̯ ŋ͡ɡlun̰afχ kθʊɬʊ‿ʁ ʎ̰eχ uwaχn̰aɡ̟͡ʟ̟̝ fχtaɰn]
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Or, we could just be really boring:
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
[pʰəŋəlyj məglunapfʰ kθyɫy rəljɛ uganagəɫ pfʰətagən]
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
[pʰəŋəlyj məglunapfʰ kθyɫy rəljɛ uganagəɫ pfʰətagən]
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
My mental pronunciation is something like [kθʉlʉ r̩:ʔʎɛh ɸtaɲ] (or [lj] instead of [ʎ] and [jn] instead of [ɲ]). not sure about the other words.
Certainly whenever I've heard "Cthulhu" pronounced aloud it's been [kəθʉ:lʉ] or similar. Sometimes I might substitute a [ʎ] in there as well; never really felt the need to substitute [ɬ] though.
Certainly whenever I've heard "Cthulhu" pronounced aloud it's been [kəθʉ:lʉ] or similar. Sometimes I might substitute a [ʎ] in there as well; never really felt the need to substitute [ɬ] though.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
The 'official' pronunciation is something like [ˈχɬʊl.ɬuː], but you can't get there from "Cthulhu". Maybe there's a dialect that merges /θ/ into /ɬ/ and does some weird things with lenition? Also, there's probably a tense/lax distinction of some sort, and lax vowels can't occur in open/final/whatever syllables, so:
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
[ʔʷŋʷlʷʊi̯ ŋ͡ɡlun̰əpf kθʊɬːuː‿ʁ ʎ̰ɛχ uwəχn̰əɡ̟͡ʟ̟̝ pftəɰn]
Also, the affricate for <fh> works better, because there's a planet called Vhoorl, and <w> is from <uu>. Doubling a vowel indicates that it's long/tense/whatever. (edit: and I think <y> can also be a vowel... long i, probably)
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
[ʔʷŋʷlʷʊi̯ ŋ͡ɡlun̰əpf kθʊɬːuː‿ʁ ʎ̰ɛχ uwəχn̰əɡ̟͡ʟ̟̝ pftəɰn]
Also, the affricate for <fh> works better, because there's a planet called Vhoorl, and <w> is from <uu>. Doubling a vowel indicates that it's long/tense/whatever. (edit: and I think <y> can also be a vowel... long i, probably)
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- Zumir
- Lebom

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
The ultimate horror is to gaze upon the dark abyss of Lovecraft's orthography...
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
- Zumir
- Lebom

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I've always liked the idea of fanlanging. While we're on the topic, has anyone thought of creating one of the languages from the Ender books?
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
There are ways to get damn near any orthography to make sense.Zumir wrote:The ultimate horror is to gaze upon the dark abyss of Lovecraft's orthography...
Come to think of it, it's not that hard to analyze the apostrophes away. In that text, they always appear before coronals, so:
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn.
/ɸɲ̩ɟ͡ʎ̝ʊi̯ ŋ̩ɡluːɲəp͡f χθʊɬːuː‿r ʎiːɛh uːɡəhɲəɟ͡ʎ̝ p͡ftəɡn̩/
And then anywhere else, it can just be /j/.
Also, <c> for /χ/, since <k> appears elsewhere.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I got into a tedious discussion with someone one over the best way to transcribe Cthulhu into Greek. Based on the "official" pronunciation, I suggested Χθλόυθλου, but she got quite dogmatic about λ as the One True Transcription for the lh. Of course, the silly fool didn't have half an inkling what a lateral fricative was in the first place.Nortaneous wrote:The 'official' pronunciation is something like [ˈχɬʊl.ɬuː], but you can't get there from "Cthulhu".
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
That transliteration doesn't seem all that bad there, considering the "official" pronunciation of Cthulhu...linguoboy wrote:I got into a tedious discussion with someone one over the best way to transcribe Cthulhu into Greek. Based on the "official" pronunciation, I suggested Χθλόυθλου, but she got quite dogmatic about λ as the One True Transcription for the lh. Of course, the silly fool didn't have half an inkling what a lateral fricative was in the first place.Nortaneous wrote:The 'official' pronunciation is something like [ˈχɬʊl.ɬuː], but you can't get there from "Cthulhu".
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
You should check out this site and get R'lyehian as a Toy Language, which I've read about but been too cheap to actually buy.Risla wrote:I am suddenly overtaken by the urge to create a Cthulhulang.
- linguofreak
- Lebom

- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:39 pm
- Location: Somewhere
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
[ɬ] sounds like /θ/ to me, and I have a conlang with /ɬ/ > /θ/. (In fact it devoices /l/ after voiceless obstruents, so I do actually end up with /kθ/ clusters that come from earlier /kl/ via /kɬ/, though I wasn't going for a Lovecraftian feel to the lang).Nortaneous wrote:The 'official' pronunciation is something like [ˈχɬʊl.ɬuː], but you can't get there from "Cthulhu". Maybe there's a dialect that merges /θ/ into /ɬ/ and does some weird things with lenition?
In this case, we could say that velarized /ɬ/ becomes /θ/ (at least in the mind of a non-native speaker coming up with a Roman orthography for whatever language Cthulhu's name comes from), while unvelarized /ɬ/ remains unchanged.
Plausible.Also, there's probably a tense/lax distinction of some sort, and lax vowels can't occur in open/final/whatever syllables, so:
- Zumir
- Lebom

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
There's a good treatment of this in Lewis' The Turkish language reform : a catastrophic success--including the intriguing suggestion that Atatürk espoused it not out of true conviction but in a cynical attempt to do an end run around language reformers run amok.
Had some guys over for cocktails on Saturday. One of them asked me the source of the "lisp" in Spanish: "When I took classes at [Instituto] Cervantes, my instructor told me--"
"You don't even have to finish that sentence; I already know it's going to be bullshit."
"He said that the false explanation is that there was a king who lisped and everyone imitated them. The real reason is Arab influence."
Is that progress of a sort? No lo sé.
Re:
It depends on what level of detail you go to. There's as many German idiolects as there are German speakers, and a dialect is basically a group of idiolects which have certain features in common. Depending on which features you group them by, there may well be 300 German dialects. Or there might be just 5. Or 127. It depends on how willing you are to lump things together.sano wrote:A guy at might work thinks there are "300 German dialects".
Srs.
At, casteda dus des ometh coisen at tusta o diédem thum čisbugan. Ai, thiosa če sane búem mos sil, ne?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
Re: Re:
I've actually heard the 300 figure before, which makes me curious what the actual basis for it is. I wonder if at some point someone did a count of published dialect descriptions, came up with a number close to that, and rounded off.Bedelato wrote:It depends on what level of detail you go to. There's as many German idiolects as there are German speakers, and a dialect is basically a group of idiolects which have certain features in common. Depending on which features you group them by, there may well be 300 German dialects. Or there might be just 5. Or 127. It depends on how willing you are to lump things together.sano wrote:A guy at might work thinks there are "300 German dialects".
- Drydic
- Smeric

- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Is there a generally-agreed upon cutoff line/point between Low German and Dutch?
- MisterBernie
- Avisaru

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2011 8:46 am
- Location: Oktoberfestonia
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Well, Wikipedia gives this map of Low Saxon dialects. Apparently the rest of the Netherlands speaks Low Franconian.
As for the number of dialects, yeah, it really depends on where you wanna draw the line between different dialects. This map has the larger dialect groups as 53 (although they include all of continental West Germanic there), but you could easily subdivide each of those a few times.
ETfix links
As for the number of dialects, yeah, it really depends on where you wanna draw the line between different dialects. This map has the larger dialect groups as 53 (although they include all of continental West Germanic there), but you could easily subdivide each of those a few times.
ETfix links
Last edited by MisterBernie on Mon Jun 06, 2011 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Constructed Voices - Another conlanging/conworlding blog.
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
Latest post: Joyful Birth of the Oiled One
- Drydic
- Smeric

- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
You don't need quotes in bbcode urls, unlike quotes and html links.
& ty.
& ty.



