Cue the ever-so-silent male heterosexual minority of the boardQueen Xalele wrote:...*photos*...
btw, that 12-yr-old pic has the
[Torco's elaborate way to say "she's pretty"]
Cue the ever-so-silent male heterosexual minority of the boardQueen Xalele wrote:...*photos*...
I'm glad I have your approval (and I'm flattered). Also, I thought Pedobear's cut-off age was 9.Torco wrote:Cue the ever-so-silent male heterosexual minority of the boardQueen Xalele wrote:...*photos*...
btw, that 12-yr-old pic has the
[Torco's elaborate way to say "she's pretty"]
Normally it would be, but I talked him into making an exception just for youQueen Xalele wrote:I'm glad I have your approval (and I'm flattered). Also, I thought Pedobear's cut-off age was 9.Torco wrote:Cue the ever-so-silent male heterosexual minority of the boardQueen Xalele wrote:...*photos*...
btw, that 12-yr-old pic has the
[Torco's elaborate way to say "she's pretty"]
Nah, dude, you're doing it wrong... you need to make it a lot more convoluted XDQueen Xalele, you are pretty!
As a homo who still thinks the female form can be alluring, I will join the calls of the silent minority in saying "I'd tap that".Torco wrote:Nah, dude, you're doing it wrong... you need to make it a lot more convoluted XD
Only if you were going "Um, uhh uhh um er" and possibly sweating while you were posting it.Simmalti wrote:As a homo who still thinks the female form can be alluring, I will join the calls of the silent minority in saying "I'd tap that".Torco wrote:Nah, dude, you're doing it wrong... you need to make it a lot more convoluted XD
Convoluted enough, teacher?
XinuX wrote:I learned this language, but then I sneezed and now am in prison for high treason. 0/10 would not speak again.
Quality over quantity?the duke of nuke wrote:Anyway, more evidence to support the Girls On The ZBB Hypothesis
You're certainly very photogenic.Queen Xalele wrote:Thank you, everyone. I'm very flattered. I hate taking pictures of myself and I was quite hesitant in posting those.
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.
Wha...? I see no exceptions here.Risla wrote:I can think of one major exception for that hypothesis.
Agreed.Simmalti wrote:@MisterBernie - You look scary, but in a good way
Torco will be proudAstraios wrote:Agreed.Simmalti wrote:@MisterBernie - You look scary, but in a good way
He has taught you well xDSimmalti wrote:Torco will be proud
Sounds like you're bi, then.Simmalti wrote:As a homo who still thinks the female form can be alluring, I will join the calls of the silent minority in saying "I'd tap that".Torco wrote:Nah, dude, you're doing it wrong... you need to make it a lot more convoluted XD
Convoluted enough, teacher?
Well done, my young padawan.Simmalti wrote:Torco will be proudAstraios wrote:Agreed.Simmalti wrote:@MisterBernie - You look scary, but in a good way
Disagree, because you can find (fe)males hot but still not particularly want to have sex with one.Torco wrote:Sounds like you're bi, then.
Nah.Torco wrote:Sounds like you're bi, then.Simmalti wrote:As a homo who still thinks the female form can be alluring, I will join the calls of the silent minority in saying "I'd tap that".Torco wrote:Nah, dude, you're doing it wrong... you need to make it a lot more convoluted XD
Convoluted enough, teacher?
If one would "tap" someone, understanding tap as have sex with someone with gay abandon, isn't it kind of a description of one's sexual orientation? I mean there's a bunch of transexuals I'd tap, so I guess I'm hetero-and-a-bit-of-tranny-sexual, if one were to characterize people. If you like dudes but would tap some chicks, sounds like bi to me.Astraios wrote:Disagree, because you can find (fe)males hot but still not particularly want to have sex with one.Torco wrote:Sounds like you're bi, then.
Not necessarily... you keep an eye on possible competitors, or at least I do, through observing pack-like behaviour. When some dude is being all alpha male on my females, that's when I know there's competition going on... yeah, real enlightened, but more generally, I don't think many straight dudes notice attractivity in dudes, cause it's (culturally defined as) kind of gay. and (many males are brought up to think and feel that) men shouldn't do gay things.Guitarplayer wrote:Uhm, isn't it normal to also notice attractivity in one's own sex even if one identifies as straight? After all, you gotta keep an eye at possible competitors!