Re: Happy Things Thread
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2017 8:58 pm
Oh hi there.
Hello. A European here. I have no idea what you are talking about.Viktor77 wrote:I'm a bit giddy as apparently my views on the question of what kind of power the EU can most be described as being gives me a solid European orientation for an American. Every American in my class answered that the EU was most a market power. The one German, our Greek professor, and I, responded that it is more a normative power. The professor asked me if I had some sort of European connections because apparently he's consistently found this distinction when teaching this course (external relations of the EU). So it just made me momentarily happy that I see things from perhaps a more European perspective despite being American. This goes along with an interview I just did for a Belgian project called Faces of Europe (which a Belgian friend working for the project insisted I do despite not being European).
I'm a nerd. Deal with it.
Well, THAT's really cool! Congratulations! What's it about?kodé wrote:Turned in my dissertation to my committee!!! If I can defend it in a month, then I'll be DOCTOR kodé!
It's about how cyclic computation of words in morphosyntax can result in recursion of prosodic words (a.k.a. phonological words). It's an integration of Phase Theory (in Minimalism and Distributed Morphology) with Optimality Theory and specifically Match Theory. I have two detailed case studies, on templatic morphology in Chukchansi Yokuts and the Stem in Creek/Muskogee. Then I have a (bullshit) typology chapter to round it out.Risla wrote:Well, THAT's really cool! Congratulations! What's it about?kodé wrote:Turned in my dissertation to my committee!!! If I can defend it in a month, then I'll be DOCTOR kodé!
Sounds really cool! I will admit to being a sucker for OT. I'd love to try to read it if you wanted to send it this way, although in all honesty I'd probably get halfway through and give up (I don't remember much of minimalism or distributed morphology, and never read much about prosody).kodé wrote:It's about how cyclic computation of words in morphosyntax can result in recursion of prosodic words (a.k.a. phonological words). It's an integration of Phase Theory (in Minimalism and Distributed Morphology) with Optimality Theory and specifically Match Theory. I have two detailed case studies, on templatic morphology in Chukchansi Yokuts and the Stem in Creek/Muskogee. Then I have a (bullshit) typology chapter to round it out.Risla wrote:Well, THAT's really cool! Congratulations! What's it about?kodé wrote:Turned in my dissertation to my committee!!! If I can defend it in a month, then I'll be DOCTOR kodé!
That deserves a PhD on the basis of the description alonekodé wrote:It's about how cyclic computation of words in morphosyntax can result in recursion of prosodic words (a.k.a. phonological words). It's an integration of Phase Theory (in Minimalism and Distributed Morphology) with Optimality Theory and specifically Match Theory. I have two detailed case studies, on templatic morphology in Chukchansi Yokuts and the Stem in Creek/Muskogee. Then I have a (bullshit) typology chapter to round it out.Risla wrote:Well, THAT's really cool! Congratulations! What's it about?kodé wrote:Turned in my dissertation to my committee!!! If I can defend it in a month, then I'll be DOCTOR kodé!
I'll send it your way, for sure! PM me your email. OT is indeed pretty great.Risla wrote:Sounds really cool! I will admit to being a sucker for OT. I'd love to try to read it if you wanted to send it this way, although in all honesty I'd probably get halfway through and give up (I don't remember much of minimalism or distributed morphology, and never read much about prosody).kodé wrote:It's about how cyclic computation of words in morphosyntax can result in recursion of prosodic words (a.k.a. phonological words). It's an integration of Phase Theory (in Minimalism and Distributed Morphology) with Optimality Theory and specifically Match Theory. I have two detailed case studies, on templatic morphology in Chukchansi Yokuts and the Stem in Creek/Muskogee. Then I have a (bullshit) typology chapter to round it out.Risla wrote:Well, THAT's really cool! Congratulations! What's it about?kodé wrote:Turned in my dissertation to my committee!!! If I can defend it in a month, then I'll be DOCTOR kodé!
haha, i guess. lots of technical stuff in there. but there are some decently widely applicable generalizations.alice wrote:That deserves a PhD on the basis of the description alone
No doubt. I'm still trying to work out the difference between structural essentialism and essential structuralism, and how they relate to ambi-generative models of stochastic phonological processes.kodé wrote:haha, i guess. lots of technical stuff in there. but there are some decently widely applicable generalizations.alice wrote:That deserves a PhD on the basis of the description alone
I will admit to sucking at OT.Risla wrote:I will admit to being a sucker for OT.
Congratulations!kodé wrote:Turned in my dissertation to my committee!!! If I can defend it in a month, then I'll be DOCTOR kodé!
sweeeet! what kind of music do you play?Ryusenshi wrote:My band is on a roll! We're surely going to be ready for our concert on May 18!
Ars Lande wrote:Le Pen lost. That's a happy thing.
I've checked BBC news out of curiosity, did they really call him the Big Mac?alice wrote:Ars Lande wrote:Le Pen lost. That's a happy thing.
The number of commenters on the appropriate page of the BBC website who aren't happy is slightly less happy, however.