The Official ZBB Quote Thread

Aurora Rossa · Post by **Aurora Rossa** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:37 am

Which is funny because it's true, pretty much every country has its mad racist party that annoys everyone else from there.

Who do you consider the US's mad racist party?

Nortaneous · Post by **Nortaneous** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:42 pm

Eddy wrote:
Which is funny because it's true, pretty much every country has its mad racist party that annoys everyone else from there.
Who do you consider the US's mad racist party?

both of them

finlay · Post by **finlay** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:09 pm

Tea party

Aurora Rossa · Post by **Aurora Rossa** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:14 pm

Yeah, but do they really qualify as a party, strictly speaking? They seem more like the Republican Party's more enthusiastic wing.

Viktor77 · Post by **Viktor77** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:28 pm

Eddy wrote:Yeah, but do they really qualify as a party, strictly speaking? They seem more like the Republican Party's more enthusiastic wing.

Eddy, Eddy, Eddy. Did you miss the entire shocking news that Tea Party candidate Christie O'Donnell defeated GOP candidate Mike Castle? Did you miss the huge discussion about how the Tea Party is threatening to take down the GOP's control of the Senate? However did you equate the Tea party to the GOP????????

Pthagnar · Post by **Pthagnar** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:30 pm

Viktor77 wrote:However did you equate the Tea party to the GOP????????

he didn't. he said they were a proper subset.

Pthagnar · Post by **Pthagnar** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 1:32 pm

see, for example, the fact that Ms. O'Donnell won the *Republican* primary

finlay · Post by **finlay** » Wed Sep 22, 2010 4:02 pm

Viktor77 wrote:
Eddy wrote:Yeah, but do they really qualify as a party, strictly speaking? They seem more like the Republican Party's more enthusiastic wing.
Eddy, Eddy, Eddy. Did you miss the entire shocking news that Tea Party candidate Christie O'Donnell defeated GOP candidate Mike Castle? Did you miss the huge discussion about how the Tea Party is threatening to take down the GOP's control of the Senate? However did you equate the Tea party to the GOP????????

*How ever
and he's right (:!:) in the sense that tea partiers and republicans are pretty much the same, tea partiers simply being more vocal. And that I'm not sure whether they qualify as a party.

jal · Post by **jal** » Thu Sep 23, 2010 4:19 am

finlay wrote:And that I'm not sure whether they qualify as a party.

They are the right wing (or should we say the brainless wing?) of the Republican party. So no, they do not qualify as a party.

JAL

bulbaquil · Post by **bulbaquil** » Thu Sep 23, 2010 7:52 am

QUOTE THREAD.

masako · Post by **masako** » Thu Sep 23, 2010 8:37 am

bulbaquil wrote:QUOTE THREAD.

Neek · Post by **Neek** » Thu Sep 23, 2010 9:53 am

""

QUOTES!

Torco · Post by **Torco** » Thu Sep 23, 2010 12:49 pm

Neek wrote:""

QUOTES!

=D

catberry · Post by **catberry** » Thu Sep 23, 2010 5:54 pm

Neek wrote:""

QUOTES!

캉탁 · Post by 캉탁 » Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:16 pm

Berek wrote:
linguofreak wrote:Believe me: The average person knows as little about physics as they do about linguists. They don't so much believe the old theories as they just get the new ones *horribly wrong*. They know just enough about Relativity and Quantum Mechanics to be dangerous, and probably don't know much more than the average medieval peasant about the more ho-hum areas of physics like conservation of momentum.
Well, according to the Oprah crowd, Quantum Mechanics goes "we can't find an electron, so God owes me that dream house."

masako · Post by **masako** » Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:59 am

Miekko wrote:Think, dammit, think!! It isn't that fucking hard.

Sleinad Flar · Post by **Sleinad Flar** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:01 pm

finlay wrote:
Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
houses?

Gaxa · Post by **Gaxa** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:29 pm

Torco wrote:If a woman sez size matter, I'm not arguing

Io · Post by Io » Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:38 pm

Sleinad Flar wrote:
finlay wrote:
Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
houses?

Because, for example, bridges don't need architects?

Viktor77 · Post by **Viktor77** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 6:40 pm

Io wrote:
Sleinad Flar wrote:
finlay wrote:
Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
houses?
Because bridges don't need architects?

And apparently neither do commercial buildings.

Morrígan · Post by **Morrígan** » Wed Sep 29, 2010 7:38 pm

Viktor77 wrote:
Io wrote:
Sleinad Flar wrote:
finlay wrote:
Viktor77 wrote:Ooh, your dad is an architect? What does he design?
houses?
Because bridges don't need architects?
And apparently neither do commercial buildings.

No, I believe those things need structural engineers.

Radius Solis · Post by **Radius Solis** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 7:55 am

Salmoneus wrote: 1/10th of atheists prey at least weekly.

Torco · Post by **Torco** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:06 am

Radius Solis wrote:
Salmoneus wrote: 1/10th of atheists prey at least weekly.

so we're predators?

masako · Post by **masako** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 9:37 am

Salmoneus wrote:Because superstition can be shown to be false, at least theoretically.

catberry · Post by **catberry** » Tue Oct 05, 2010 5:10 pm

Torco wrote:
Radius Solis wrote:
Salmoneus wrote: 1/10th of atheists prey at least weekly.
so we're predators?

The elderly are the most delicious

.