What is it then? And anyway 'does' is a verb, and even in English has to be inflected -es. I just don't see what the man was trying to claim. That you can speak Welsh without having to learn verb inflections? OK, you can (mostly) use construction with various auxillary/modal verbs, but *they* have to be inflected and tend to be irregular, whereas especially in Modern spoken Welsh, there is very little irregularity in most content verbs. Weird!Drydic Guinea wrote:he works vs he does workclawgrip wrote:What is a self-inflected verb?
Note that work in the second example is not the noun.
Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
- marconatrix
- Lebom
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:29 pm
- Location: Kernow
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Kyn nag ov den skentel pur ...
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I'm guessing he means that there is a relatively low number of verbs that are typically fully inflected, and the content verbs end up in some kind of mostly uninflected form. Like "I did go home last night and did have a shower and did sleep" or something. I don't know anything about Welsh though so I may be wrong here.
- Hallow XIII
- Avisaru
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Under Heaven
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
linguoboy wrote:All conjunctions evolved from [ə].
陳第 wrote:蓋時有古今,地有南北;字有更革,音有轉移,亦勢所必至。
Read all about my excellent conlangsR.Rusanov wrote:seks istiyorum
sex want-PRS-1sg
Basic Conlanging Advice
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
This guy.
Well we're certainly beat there.So, around 2500 BC dialects are supposed beginning to diversify into separate languages...If a word has its reconstructed PIE ancestor, then to which PIE dialect does it belong?
Even when I'm trying to practice Sanskrit and get a soda at the same time?When a language is spoken in the kitchen then one knows that it is still very much alive.
Last edited by Vuvuzela on Fri Mar 01, 2013 6:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Herr Dunkel
- Smeric
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: In this multiverse or another
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
YES THIS IS A CREDIBLE MANThere was a huge gap in development between the native Americans and the Europeans, separating both effectively.
That was not the case on the right bank of the Rhine. The local native Germans were not that retarded.
Also:
After proto-proto-Germanic was formed, the language expanded to the west, following the Danube, but also to the southeast, to the coasts of the Adriatic Sea where it underwent a second creolisation, partly from the locals, partly from new PIE farmer-colonists who settled there. There it became proto-Germano-Occitan. From there the language crossed the Adriatic Sea and in Italy, a third creolisation happened into proto-Occitan-Roman. To make it even more complex, the local people in Italy already spoke here and there an other creolised form of PIE which had been imported by boat before and more directly from the Black Sea region.
sano wrote:To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
He'd be cute if he wasn't such an imbecile.linguoboy wrote:All conjunctions evolved from [ə].
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
- Location: Leiden, the Netherlands
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
http://languageinindia.com/feb2013/jassemwater.pdf
Have you heard? English and Greek stem from Arabic !
Have you heard? English and Greek stem from Arabic !
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
http://www.hunmagyar.org/tor/index.html
site wrote:The origins of the Hungarians can be traced back to Ancient Mesopotamia through the Sumerian-Scythian-Hun-Avar-Magyar ethno-linguistic continuity, which, together with the evidence of the archeological artifacts of Sumerian origin found in the Carpathian Basin, indicates that the ancestors of the Hungarians were the first permanent settlers of the Carpathian Basin.
etc.site wrote:Indo-European linguists reject the possibility of a connection between the Uralic and Altaic ethno-linguistic groups. This is an unfounded assumption as the evidence indicates that the Uralic and Altaic groups were formed through ethno-linguistic convergence and hybridization with Turanian peoples such as the Sumerians and Scythians. The Uralic and Altaic groups therefore share common Turanian ethno-linguistic roots.
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Jesus Christ, where do I have to go to avoid PCT nutters on the intarwebs? There's one now on the Irish Learners' Forum with a half-baked idée fixe about ancient Irish-Serbian connexions whose got an Irish dictionary of common usage (sans etymological information) and isn't afraid to use it.
- Herr Dunkel
- Smeric
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: In this multiverse or another
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
What. How.linguoboy wrote:There's one now on the Irish Learners' Forum with a half-baked theory about ancient Irish-Serbian connexions whose got an Irish dictionary of common usage (sans etymological information) and isn't afraid to use it.
Link plox >_>
sano wrote:To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano
- Hallow XIII
- Avisaru
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Under Heaven
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
陳第 wrote:蓋時有古今,地有南北;字有更革,音有轉移,亦勢所必至。
Read all about my excellent conlangsR.Rusanov wrote:seks istiyorum
sex want-PRS-1sg
Basic Conlanging Advice
- Herr Dunkel
- Smeric
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: In this multiverse or another
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Ach, my faith in humanity has been diminished anew
sano wrote:To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano
- marconatrix
- Lebom
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:29 pm
- Location: Kernow
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Cothrom na Féinne dha, at least Serbian is IE, he might have picked Hungarian or Basquelinguoboy wrote:Jesus Christ, where do I have to go to avoid PCT nutters on the intarwebs? There's one now on the Irish Learners' Forum with a half-baked idée fixe about ancient Irish-Serbian connexions whose got an Irish dictionary of common usage (sans etymological information) and isn't afraid to use it.
Kyn nag ov den skentel pur ...
- marconatrix
- Lebom
- Posts: 234
- Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:29 pm
- Location: Kernow
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I just read where he said :
Uh? Isn't that just a wee bit early, like three or four millennia? And I'm sure the Serbs were slavs so nowhere near the Balkans at that time, but maybe the academics are telling lies again?The earliest iron methalurgical center in the world, dated to 14th–13th century bce, was round in south eastern Serbia in the hillfort settlement on the hill called Hisar. This site belongs to the earliest proto illyrian period.
Kyn nag ov den skentel pur ...
- Herr Dunkel
- Smeric
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: In this multiverse or another
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Look at it like this: I've heard from a Romanian that the Romanians were the first Christians as witnessed by their creation of the pregnant bust of Virgin Mary some 15ka before the conspiracist zionist Romans said Christ was born.
There are wackier people
There are wackier people
sano wrote:To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Well...that statement by itself isn't crackpottery, unless the evidence doesn't back up the claim. It's just stating that a claimed earliest ironworking site is located in what is now southwestern Serbia. And "proto-illyrian"...well frankly I don't think you could get more vague as to what that means, short of saying the Human Period.marconatrix wrote:I just read where he said :
Uh? Isn't that just a wee bit early, like three or four millennia? And I'm sure the Serbs were slavs so nowhere near the Balkans at that time, but maybe the academics are telling lies again?The earliest iron methalurgical center in the world, dated to 14th–13th century bce, was round in south eastern Serbia in the hillfort settlement on the hill called Hisar. This site belongs to the earliest proto illyrian period.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
He has one thing in common with the people on this board. He cannot tell the difference between [ə] and [ɐ]. Granted, in many dialects of American English they are merged, but where they are merged, the enunciated pronunciation is [ɐ]. [ə] is only found in reduced vowels. So when he carefully pronounces each word, he avoids ever saying [ə].linguoboy wrote:All conjunctions evolved from [ə].
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]
- Hallow XIII
- Avisaru
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Under Heaven
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Protip: avoid making general statements, lest the presence of native German speakers bust your theorybrandrinn wrote:He has one thing in common with the people on this board. He cannot tell the difference between [ə] and [ɐ]. Granted, in many dialects of American English they are merged, but where they are merged, the enunciated pronunciation is [ɐ]. [ə] is only found in reduced vowels. So when he carefully pronounces each word, he avoids ever saying [ə].linguoboy wrote:All conjunctions evolved from [ə].
陳第 wrote:蓋時有古今,地有南北;字有更革,音有轉移,亦勢所必至。
Read all about my excellent conlangsR.Rusanov wrote:seks istiyorum
sex want-PRS-1sg
Basic Conlanging Advice
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Sorry, I think you misunderstood me. I was talking about English. In fact, I specifically mentioned American English, where the two sounds are often merged. The fact that they are distinct in German isn't really relevant.Hallow XIII wrote:Protip: avoid making general statements, lest the presence of native German speakers bust your theorybrandrinn wrote:He has one thing in common with the people on this board. He cannot tell the difference between [ə] and [ɐ]. Granted, in many dialects of American English they are merged, but where they are merged, the enunciated pronunciation is [ɐ]. [ə] is only found in reduced vowels. So when he carefully pronounces each word, he avoids ever saying [ə].linguoboy wrote:All conjunctions evolved from [ə].
[quote="Nortaneous"]Is South Africa better off now than it was a few decades ago?[/quote]
- Herr Dunkel
- Smeric
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: In this multiverse or another
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
He did say English, tho.Hallow XIII wrote:Protip: avoid making general statements, lest the presence of native German speakers bust your theorybrandrinn wrote:He has one thing in common with the people on this board. He cannot tell the difference between [ə] and [ɐ]. Granted, in many dialects of American English they are merged, but where they are merged, the enunciated pronunciation is [ɐ]. [In American English] [ə] is only found in reduced vowels. So when he carefully pronounces each word, he avoids ever saying [ə].linguoboy wrote:All conjunctions evolved from [ə].
sano wrote:To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Apparently they just used the character for womb.A Girl I was Speaking to Today wrote:My Cultural Studies teacher told me the Chinese didn't have a character for woman till the 18th century
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Might want to show her this:
http://english.chnmus.net/fortnightsele ... e_2993.htm
http://english.chnmus.net/fortnightsele ... e_2993.htm
- Herr Dunkel
- Smeric
- Posts: 1088
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
- Location: In this multiverse or another
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
That article itself holds some fun stuff by itself too - apparently the two viewpoints on the date of origin of the stele are that a) it was made in 92AD b) it wasn't made in 92ADclawgrip wrote:Might want to show her this:
http://english.chnmus.net/fortnightsele ... e_2993.htm
sano wrote:To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Also I'm amused by the wording suggesting these are only two out of many options.Herr Dunkel wrote:That article itself holds some fun stuff by itself too - apparently the two viewpoints on the date of origin of the stele are that a) it was made in 92AD b) it wasn't made in 92ADclawgrip wrote:Might want to show her this:
http://english.chnmus.net/fortnightsele ... e_2993.htm
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]