Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 8:34 pm
It seems that the old one was pruned. I therefore offer the Hungarian-Sumerian hypothesis.
WE ARE MOVING - see Ephemera
http://www.incatena.org/
In his defence, historical linguistics does kind of stop making sense if one takes the Earth to be 6000 years old. (But then again, so do a lot of other things.)MrKrov wrote:http://www.bearfabrique.org/Catastrophism/babel.html
Easy shooting.For instance, when Europeans first came to Australia, they found hundreds of aborigine languaes, no two of which apparently resembled eachother any more than English and Japanese resemble eachother.
Wait... what?Communications amongst humans before the flood were telepathic in nature, other than for a small vocabulary of spoken words used by priests for ritualistic purposes. This was enabled by the electrostatic charge near the Earths surface and by the plasma of the antique solar system in general, and involved the use of the right side of the human brain as Julian Jaynes notes.
Absolutely classic!Delthayre wrote:Wait... what?Communications amongst humans before the flood were telepathic in nature, other than for a small vocabulary of spoken words used by priests for ritualistic purposes. This was enabled by the electrostatic charge near the Earths surface and by the plasma of the antique solar system in general, and involved the use of the right side of the human brain as Julian Jaynes notes.
I think he might've got Lithuanian mixed up with Estonian.Tropylium wrote:Tho it is beyond me why he also claims that "English is closer to Russian than Lithuanian is"…
Half of the languages they talk about there don't even exist! It's gotten so bad there are separate sections for this drivel!
Well this makes perfect sense; after all, El Shaddai spoke the world into creation using Hebrew.Kai_DaiGoji wrote:I checked it out - it basically says that Biblical Hewbrew is the original garden of Eden language, My favorite is the guy behind it all - you see his bio page, and all his degrees are in English lit.
citation needed
The bible should be good enoughMrKrov wrote:citation needed
Well this makes perfect sense; after all, El Shaddai spoke the world into creation using Hebrew.
citation needed
Genesis 1:3 wrote:וַיֹּ֥אמֶר אֱלֹהִ֖ים יְהִ֣י א֑וֹר וַֽיְהִי־אֽוֹר
to do that.used Hebrew
No, you are right. It is only implied there. Here is a better source:MrKrov wrote:The funny thing is not one word of that says this יהוה characterto do that.used Hebrew
orספר יצירה wrote:בִּשְׁלשִׁים וּשְׁתַּיִם נְתִיבוֹת פְּלִיאוֹת חָכְמָה הָקַק
יָהּ יְהוָֹה צְבָאוֹת אֱלהִׁים הַיִּים וּמֶלֶךְ עוֹלָם אֵל שַׁדַּי
רַחוּם וְחַנּוּן רָם וְנִשָּׂא שׁוֹכֵן עַד מָרוֹם וְקָדוֹשׁ שְׁמוֹ
וּבָרָא אֶת עוֹלָמוֹ בִשְׁלשָׁה סְפָרִים *בִּסְפָר וְסִפּוּר
וְסֵפֶר׃ עֶשֶׂר סְפִירוֹת בְּלִימָה וְעֶשְׂרִים וּשְׁתַּיִם
אוֹתִיּוֹת יְסוֹד׃ שָׁלשׁ אִמּוֹת וְשֶׁבַע כְּפוּלוֹת וּשְׁתֵּים
עֶשְׂרְה פְשׁוּטוֹת׃
And there is this part:Sefer Yetzirah wrote:Yah, the Lord of hosts, the living God, King of the Universe, Omnipotent, All-Kind and Merciful, Supreme and Extolled, who is Eternal, Sublime and Most-Holy, ordained and created the Universe in thirty-two mysterious paths of wisdom by three Sepharim, namely: 1) S’for 2) Sippur and 3) Sapher which are in Him one and the same. They consist of a decade out of nothing and of twenty-two fundamental letters. He divided the twenty-two consonants into three divisions: 1) three mothers, fundamental letters or first elements 2) seven double and 3) twelve simple consonants.
Emphasis mine, natch.The decade out of nothing is analogous to that of the ten fingers (and toes) of the human body, five parallel to five, and in the centre of which is the covenant with the only One, by the word of the tongue and the rite of Abraham.
Everyone knows there are over 9000.Qang wrote:A guy at might work thinks there are "300 German dialects".
Srs.