Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Discussions worth keeping around later.
User avatar
masako
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:31 pm
Location: 가매
Contact:

Post by masako »

Åge Kruger wrote:
Qang wrote:A guy at might work thinks there are "300 German dialects".

Srs.
Everyone knows there are over 9000.
Well, yeah.

Acid Badger
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Post by Acid Badger »

"Every language in the world descends from Turkisch, except for Armenian and Jewish."

User avatar
rickardspaghetti
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by rickardspaghetti »

Who said that?
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。

User avatar
Soap
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: Scattered disc
Contact:

Post by Soap »

It's a splittist/lumpist thing. If you look at a dialect map of every English speaking country and make a line along every little isogloss, you could probably come up with a claim that there are 300 dialects of English.

Looking at Wikipedia I can find classification schemes that divide Low German into a bunch of dialects with names like Oldambsters and Kollumerpompsters, and all of that is crammed into a little area, so if the rest of the German speaking area was similarly diverse I bet you'd have 300 dialects there too. But that a lot of assumptions, and doesn't mean such a classification scheme is valid. I bet a lot of the speakers of the dialects would be surprised to be told that they were speaking them.

http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldambtsters
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kollumerpompsters
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image

Acid Badger
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Post by Acid Badger »

rickardspaghetti wrote:Who said that?
A turkish guy I know. I found it quite amusing.

Etherman
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 75
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 11:29 pm
Location: Low Hell, MA

Post by Etherman »

TheGoatMan wrote:
Kai_DaiGoji wrote:I checked it out - it basically says that Biblical Hewbrew is the original garden of Eden language, My favorite is the guy behind it all - you see his bio page, and all his degrees are in English lit.
Well this makes perfect sense; after all, El Shaddai spoke the world into creation using Hebrew.
Zionist propaganda. Allah speaks Arabic as demonstrated by the fact that the Quran is in Arabic and that any translation of the Quran into another language is not the Quran.

User avatar
Gaxa
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 21
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 5:24 pm

Post by Gaxa »

"Chinese comes from Tamil, and Japanese comes from Chinese! Stop with your stupid Proto-Sino-Tibetian nonsense and Altaic stupidity!"

Summing up a conversation I had with an Indian friend of mine.

User avatar
linguofreak
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:39 pm
Location: Somewhere
Contact:

Post by linguofreak »

Tropylium wrote:
In his defence, historical linguistics does kind of stop making sense if one takes the Earth to be 6000 years old. (But then again, so do a lot of other things.)
I'd argue with that: Historical Linguistics makes a lot of claims within the past 4000 years (by a young-Earth Biblical chronology it's about 2000 years from creation to Babel), and we find that where written records exist, these claims are born out. (This is where he really gets things wrong: Languages *do* evolve, otherwise one must explain the appearance that Latin evolved into French and Spanish, and why English orthography is so screwed up (it's easy to explain if you take the current orthography to be a fossilization of Middle English)).

If one makes the assumption that an event along the lines of the Babel story occured, all this does is restrict the time period over which historical linguistics (or any other empirical science, in the case of other world-changing miracles) can make valid claims. It doesn't affect the validity of claims about things that happened since Babel. Empirical sciences tell us what the rules are in the case of "business as usual". They can't tell us what happens when business does not go as usual, or whether business has ever not gone as usual.

User avatar
rickardspaghetti
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Sweden

Post by rickardspaghetti »

Fanu wrote:
rickardspaghetti wrote:Who said that?
A turkish guy I know. I found it quite amusing.
And he was serious?
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。

Acid Badger
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 196
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Post by Acid Badger »

rickardspaghetti wrote:
Fanu wrote:
rickardspaghetti wrote:Who said that?
A turkish guy I know. I found it quite amusing.
And he was serious?
Oh yes, he was.

tezcatlip0ca
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 385
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:30 pm

Post by tezcatlip0ca »

One teacher of mine used to say that all languages descend from Latin except Basque.
The Conlanger Formerly Known As Aiďos

Kai_DaiGoji
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:51 pm

Post by Kai_DaiGoji »

Fanu wrote:
rickardspaghetti wrote:
Fanu wrote:
rickardspaghetti wrote:Who said that?
A turkish guy I know. I found it quite amusing.
And he was serious?
Oh yes, he was.
"Give me a word, any word, and I show you how the root of that word is Greek."
"Kimono."
"Kimono, okay, let's see. I have it. Kimono comes from Greek word, Chimonas, which means, 'winter' - and what do you wear in the winter: a robe."
[quote="TomHChappell"]I don't know if that answers your question; is English a natlang?[/quote]

User avatar
catberry
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:03 pm
Location: Slowly coming this way

Post by catberry »

Aid'os wrote:One teacher of mine used to say that all languages descend from Latin except Basque.
The anti-Edo Nyland.
You killed yourself. By waving a scientist around.
-is female-

User avatar
ayyub
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Oct 09, 2005 8:23 am
Location: USA

Post by ayyub »

Kai_DaiGoji wrote:"Give me a word, any word, and I show you how the root of that word is Greek."
"Kimono."
"Kimono, okay, let's see. I have it. Kimono comes from Greek word, Chimonas, which means, 'winter' - and what do you wear in the winter: a robe."
:D
Ulrike Meinhof wrote:The merger is between /8/ and /9/, merging into /8/. Seeing as they're just one number apart, that's not too strange.

Kai_DaiGoji
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:51 pm

Post by Kai_DaiGoji »

ayyub wrote:
Kai_DaiGoji wrote:"Give me a word, any word, and I show you how the root of that word is Greek."
"Kimono."
"Kimono, okay, let's see. I have it. Kimono comes from Greek word, Chimonas, which means, 'winter' - and what do you wear in the winter: a robe."
:D
I was worried with such an international crowd here that the reference would be missed :)
[quote="TomHChappell"]I don't know if that answers your question; is English a natlang?[/quote]

sirdanilot
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 734
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
Location: Leiden, the Netherlands

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by sirdanilot »

Random facts on some googled site...

"Language with the most words: English, approx. 250,000 distinct words

Language with the fewest words: Taki Taki (also called Sranan), 340 words. Taki Taki is an English-based Creole spoken by 120,000 in the South American country of Suriname."

The second one might just be true if the Taki Taki they speak of is not a creole, but a simple pidgin. But can you really call that a language. In any case, I call BS.

User avatar
rickardspaghetti
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by rickardspaghetti »

I don't think it sounds as if these guys are out to decieve. I think they're just misinformed.
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。

User avatar
MrKrov
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 51
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 3:01 pm
Location: /ai/ < [a:]
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by MrKrov »

I didn't know quackery depended on being intentionally deceitful. I don't think it does!
Pthug wrote:
Viktor77 wrote:I grew up my entire life surrounded by a Special Ed educator.
i can imagine
Catch me on YouTube.

User avatar
sangi39
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:34 am
Location: North Yorkshire, UK

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by sangi39 »

sirdanilot wrote:Random facts on some googled site...

"Language with the most words: English, approx. 250,000 distinct words

Language with the fewest words: Taki Taki (also called Sranan), 340 words. Taki Taki is an English-based Creole spoken by 120,000 in the South American country of Suriname."

The second one might just be true if the Taki Taki they speak of is not a creole, but a simple pidgin. But can you really call that a language. In any case, I call BS.

I think I read a short paper about Sranan which more or less said that the "340" figure has come about as the result of overanalysis of stems. To take an English example it'd be like saying that "flute" is actually "flu"+"te (alternative of "te" in the solfege scale)" rather than an unanalysable root. In other words, under the the 340-word analysis, some of the words which would be considered compounds don't really have meanings which intuitively relate to the underlying roots.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.

User avatar
Whimemsz
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Gimaamaa onibaaganing

Re:

Post by Whimemsz »

Fanu wrote:
rickardspaghetti wrote:
Fanu wrote:
rickardspaghetti wrote:Who said that?
A turkish guy I know. I found it quite amusing.
And he was serious?
Oh yes, he was.
Well obv. those bastard Armenians with their constant whining about "genocide this" and "genocide that" don't speak a language descended from Turkish. But "Jewish"? Is this about the Israeli raid on that ship, or what?

bulbaquil
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:31 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by bulbaquil »

sangi39 wrote:To take an English example it'd be like saying that "flute" is actually "flu"+"te (alternative of "te" in the solfege scale)" rather than an unanalysable root.
But that totally is where "flute" comes from. Isn't it obvious?
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!

User avatar
dhok
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by dhok »


User avatar
Rui
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 541
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:14 pm
Location: Beiʒing 拆那

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Rui »


Bristel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Miracle, Inc. Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Bristel »

Wow... just wow... interesting spin on Chinese characters, but I heard a duck call the entire time I was reading it... QUACK
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró

User avatar
Morrígan
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Wizard Tower

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Morrígan »

Bristel wrote:
Wow... just wow... interesting spin on Chinese characters, but I heard a duck call the entire time I was reading it... QUACK
I died a little.

Post Reply