Well, yeah.Åge Kruger wrote:Everyone knows there are over 9000.Qang wrote:A guy at might work thinks there are "300 German dialects".
Srs.
Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
- rickardspaghetti
- Avisaru
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
- Location: Sweden
It's a splittist/lumpist thing. If you look at a dialect map of every English speaking country and make a line along every little isogloss, you could probably come up with a claim that there are 300 dialects of English.
Looking at Wikipedia I can find classification schemes that divide Low German into a bunch of dialects with names like Oldambsters and Kollumerpompsters, and all of that is crammed into a little area, so if the rest of the German speaking area was similarly diverse I bet you'd have 300 dialects there too. But that a lot of assumptions, and doesn't mean such a classification scheme is valid. I bet a lot of the speakers of the dialects would be surprised to be told that they were speaking them.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldambtsters
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kollumerpompsters
Looking at Wikipedia I can find classification schemes that divide Low German into a bunch of dialects with names like Oldambsters and Kollumerpompsters, and all of that is crammed into a little area, so if the rest of the German speaking area was similarly diverse I bet you'd have 300 dialects there too. But that a lot of assumptions, and doesn't mean such a classification scheme is valid. I bet a lot of the speakers of the dialects would be surprised to be told that they were speaking them.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldambtsters
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kollumerpompsters
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Zionist propaganda. Allah speaks Arabic as demonstrated by the fact that the Quran is in Arabic and that any translation of the Quran into another language is not the Quran.TheGoatMan wrote:Well this makes perfect sense; after all, El Shaddai spoke the world into creation using Hebrew.Kai_DaiGoji wrote:I checked it out - it basically says that Biblical Hewbrew is the original garden of Eden language, My favorite is the guy behind it all - you see his bio page, and all his degrees are in English lit.
- linguofreak
- Lebom
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2005 10:39 pm
- Location: Somewhere
- Contact:
I'd argue with that: Historical Linguistics makes a lot of claims within the past 4000 years (by a young-Earth Biblical chronology it's about 2000 years from creation to Babel), and we find that where written records exist, these claims are born out. (This is where he really gets things wrong: Languages *do* evolve, otherwise one must explain the appearance that Latin evolved into French and Spanish, and why English orthography is so screwed up (it's easy to explain if you take the current orthography to be a fossilization of Middle English)).Tropylium wrote:In his defence, historical linguistics does kind of stop making sense if one takes the Earth to be 6000 years old. (But then again, so do a lot of other things.)MrKrov wrote:http://www.bearfabrique.org/Catastrophism/babel.html
If one makes the assumption that an event along the lines of the Babel story occured, all this does is restrict the time period over which historical linguistics (or any other empirical science, in the case of other world-changing miracles) can make valid claims. It doesn't affect the validity of claims about things that happened since Babel. Empirical sciences tell us what the rules are in the case of "business as usual". They can't tell us what happens when business does not go as usual, or whether business has ever not gone as usual.
- rickardspaghetti
- Avisaru
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
- Location: Sweden
-
- Lebom
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:50 pm
- Location: Berlin, Germany
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:30 pm
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:51 pm
"Give me a word, any word, and I show you how the root of that word is Greek."Fanu wrote:Oh yes, he was.rickardspaghetti wrote:And he was serious?Fanu wrote:A turkish guy I know. I found it quite amusing.rickardspaghetti wrote:Who said that?
"Kimono."
"Kimono, okay, let's see. I have it. Kimono comes from Greek word, Chimonas, which means, 'winter' - and what do you wear in the winter: a robe."
[quote="TomHChappell"]I don't know if that answers your question; is English a natlang?[/quote]
Kai_DaiGoji wrote:"Give me a word, any word, and I show you how the root of that word is Greek."
"Kimono."
"Kimono, okay, let's see. I have it. Kimono comes from Greek word, Chimonas, which means, 'winter' - and what do you wear in the winter: a robe."
Ulrike Meinhof wrote:The merger is between /8/ and /9/, merging into /8/. Seeing as they're just one number apart, that's not too strange.
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 5:51 pm
I was worried with such an international crowd here that the reference would be missedayyub wrote:Kai_DaiGoji wrote:"Give me a word, any word, and I show you how the root of that word is Greek."
"Kimono."
"Kimono, okay, let's see. I have it. Kimono comes from Greek word, Chimonas, which means, 'winter' - and what do you wear in the winter: a robe."
[quote="TomHChappell"]I don't know if that answers your question; is English a natlang?[/quote]
-
- Avisaru
- Posts: 734
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 1:47 pm
- Location: Leiden, the Netherlands
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Random facts on some googled site...
"Language with the most words: English, approx. 250,000 distinct words
Language with the fewest words: Taki Taki (also called Sranan), 340 words. Taki Taki is an English-based Creole spoken by 120,000 in the South American country of Suriname."
The second one might just be true if the Taki Taki they speak of is not a creole, but a simple pidgin. But can you really call that a language. In any case, I call BS.
"Language with the most words: English, approx. 250,000 distinct words
Language with the fewest words: Taki Taki (also called Sranan), 340 words. Taki Taki is an English-based Creole spoken by 120,000 in the South American country of Suriname."
The second one might just be true if the Taki Taki they speak of is not a creole, but a simple pidgin. But can you really call that a language. In any case, I call BS.
- rickardspaghetti
- Avisaru
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I don't think it sounds as if these guys are out to decieve. I think they're just misinformed.
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。
俺はその証だ。
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I didn't know quackery depended on being intentionally deceitful. I don't think it does!
Catch me on YouTube.Pthug wrote:i can imagineViktor77 wrote:I grew up my entire life surrounded by a Special Ed educator.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
sirdanilot wrote:Random facts on some googled site...
"Language with the most words: English, approx. 250,000 distinct words
Language with the fewest words: Taki Taki (also called Sranan), 340 words. Taki Taki is an English-based Creole spoken by 120,000 in the South American country of Suriname."
The second one might just be true if the Taki Taki they speak of is not a creole, but a simple pidgin. But can you really call that a language. In any case, I call BS.
I think I read a short paper about Sranan which more or less said that the "340" figure has come about as the result of overanalysis of stems. To take an English example it'd be like saying that "flute" is actually "flu"+"te (alternative of "te" in the solfege scale)" rather than an unanalysable root. In other words, under the the 340-word analysis, some of the words which would be considered compounds don't really have meanings which intuitively relate to the underlying roots.
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
Re:
Well obv. those bastard Armenians with their constant whining about "genocide this" and "genocide that" don't speak a language descended from Turkish. But "Jewish"? Is this about the Israeli raid on that ship, or what?Fanu wrote:Oh yes, he was.rickardspaghetti wrote:And he was serious?Fanu wrote:A turkish guy I know. I found it quite amusing.rickardspaghetti wrote:Who said that?
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
But that totally is where "flute" comes from. Isn't it obvious?sangi39 wrote:To take an English example it'd be like saying that "flute" is actually "flu"+"te (alternative of "te" in the solfege scale)" rather than an unanalysable root.
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!
-
- Smeric
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Miracle, Inc. Headquarters
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Wow... just wow... interesting spin on Chinese characters, but I heard a duck call the entire time I was reading it... QUACK
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I died a little.Bristel wrote:Wow... just wow... interesting spin on Chinese characters, but I heard a duck call the entire time I was reading it... QUACK