Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Discussions worth keeping around later.
User avatar
linguoboy
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3681
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 9:00 am
Location: Rogers Park/Evanston

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by linguoboy »

From the Wikipedia article on the Absheron Peninsula in Azerbaijan:
The word Absheron (Abshiron) is an ancient combined word in Turkic-Azeri dialect meaning "healing sneeze" (Abshir + on = Abshiron). The area got that name because of its healthy nature
"Citation needed", indeed.

User avatar
Soap
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1228
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 2:57 pm
Location: Scattered disc
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Soap »

In The Origin and Progress of Language [James Burnett, also known as Lord Monboddo] painstakingly analyses the structure of primitive and modern languages that argues that mankind had evolved language skills in response to his changing environment and altering social structures. His work in language evolution departed radically from then existing theories. This analysis was totally remarkable, since Burnett was partially deaf. He was intrigued with the systematics he discovered in codifying a multitude of primitive languages. Burnett was the first to discover that primitive languages create unnecessarily lengthy words for rather simple concepts. He reasoned that in early languages there was an imperative for clarity, so that redundancy was built in and seemingly unnecessary syllables added. He concluded that this form of language evolved as a method of survival when clear communication might be the determinant of avoiding danger. He demonstrated that he was aware of the advantages to those peoples who could develop superior language skills. This quasi-evolutionary idea, whilst common today, was then unusual. Burnett himself was deeply religious and often digressed to credit God with the divine first mover concept as argued in a similar vein by Aristotle.

Monboddo studied in great detail the languages of peoples colonised by Europeans, including those of the Carib, Eskimo, Huron, Algonquian, Peruvian (Quechua?) and Tahitian peoples. He was the first to see the preponderance of polysyllabic words, where some of his predecessors had dismissed primitive language as a series of monosyllabic grunts. He also made the astute observation that in Huron (or Wyandot) the words for very similar objects are astoundingly different. This fact led Monboddo to understand that primitive peoples needed to communicate reliably regarding a more limited number of subjects than in modern civilizations, which led to the polysyllabic and redundant nature of many words. He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved. Partially this disparity arises from the greater vocabulary of modern languages and the decreased need for the polysyllabic content.

Monboddo also traced the evolution of modern European languages and gave particularly great effort to understanding the ancient Greek language, in which he was proficient. He argued that Greek is the most perfect language ever established because of its complex structure and tonality, rendering it capable of expressing a wide gamut of nuances. Monboddo was the first to formulate what is now known as the single-origin hypothesis, the theory that all human origin was from a single region of the earth; he reached this conclusion by reasoning from linguistic evolution (Jones, 1789). This theory is evidence of his thinking on the topic of the evolution of Man.

-- Wikipedia
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Image

User avatar
faiuwle
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:26 am
Location: MA north shore

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by faiuwle »

Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
I know, English only has like, what, sixteen distinct vowel phonemes? We're starving here!
It's (broadly) [faɪ.ˈjuw.lɛ]
#define FEMALE

ConlangDictionary 0.3 3/15/14 (ZBB thread)

Quis vult in terra stare,
Cum possit volitare?

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by roninbodhisattva »

Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
Man, by that reasoning then...Salishan languages are pretty advanced. I like this.

Bristel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:07 pm
Location: Miracle, Inc. Headquarters
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Bristel »

roninbodhisattva wrote:
Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
Man, by that reasoning then...Salishan languages are pretty advanced. I like this.
If I were a linguistics quack, I'd totally be for that...

ʔu gʷəlapu haʔɬ siʔjaʔja... welcome good friends
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Nortaneous »

roninbodhisattva wrote:
Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
Man, by that reasoning then...Salishan languages are pretty advanced. I like this.
Great, now some """postcolonialist""" quack is going to pick up on that and use it to say the evil Europeans destroyed the most advanced civilization on Earth.

But I can't get a Berber Islamist joke to work out because Classical Arabic doesn't have batshit insane consonant clusters. Curses, foiled again!
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by roninbodhisattva »

Nortaneous wrote:But I can't get a Berber Islamist joke to work out because Classical Arabic doesn't have batshit insane consonant clusters. Curses, foiled again!
Pitty, isn't it?

User avatar
Arzena
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:19 pm
Location: ¡California, Tejas, Marruecos!

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Arzena »

Wikipedia wrote:
In some cultures <h> is known as the Letter of the Gods and therefore was seen to have intrinsic properties.
quack quack quack
A New Yorker wrote:Isn't it sort of a relief to talk about the English Premier League instead of the sad state of publishing?
Abi wrote:At this point it seems pretty apparent that PIE was simply an ancient esperanto gone awry.
Shtåså, Empotle7á, Neire Wippwo

User avatar
rickardspaghetti
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 399
Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
Location: Sweden

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by rickardspaghetti »

What source did they give for that one? c:
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。

User avatar
linguoboy
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3681
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2002 9:00 am
Location: Rogers Park/Evanston

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by linguoboy »

rickardspaghetti wrote:What source did they give for that one? c:
I Googled "Letter of the Gods" and three of the five hits led me back to that article. Maybe I'll see if the same claim is in any of the foreign language versions.

User avatar
Kilanie
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 71
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 12:38 am

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Kilanie »

This pains me so much.
I hate prescriptivists even more now... I at least thought that their rules made sense in some dialect or another.
This is atrocious.
After ordering a pint of his favorite ale, Robert was perplexed when the barmaid replied that the fishmonger was next door. The Great English Vowel Shift had begun.

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Xephyr »

Kuro no Mori wrote:
This pains me so much.
I hate prescriptivists even more now... I at least thought that their rules made sense in some dialect or another.
This is atrocious.
Passive-paranoia is basically a genre unto itself in prescriptivism:

http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2470
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2474
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2524
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Nesescosac
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 314
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: ʃɪkagoʊ, ɪlənoj, ju ɛs eɪ, ə˞θ
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Nesescosac »

My English teacher make this same mistake yesterday in class, and he will probably do the same today.
I did have a bizarrely similar (to the original poster's) accident about four years ago, in which I slipped over a cookie and somehow twisted my ankle so far that it broke
What kind of cookie?
Aeetlrcreejl > Kicgan Vekei > me /ne.ses.tso.sats/

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by roninbodhisattva »

The fear of the passive is one of those things that makes me angry to no end. Fuckin' eh, I'll use the passive if it's goddamn appropriate. Calm the fuck down I'm not threatening the integrity of my own goddamn writing.

bulbaquil
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:31 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by bulbaquil »

What's more is that it's not even something that can be excused by (c wut i did thar?) Latinophilia, as Latin had a passive voice.
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!

Trailsend
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 169
Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Trailsend »

I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.

Really bugs me when the literarily-minded start crusading against it without bothering first to learn what it is (and why "he was happy" is not it), though.

bulbaquil
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:31 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by bulbaquil »

Trailsend wrote:I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.
This statement is doubted by me. No detrimental usage of the passive voice has ever been observed by me.
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!

User avatar
Legion
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:56 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Legion »

bulbaquil wrote:
Trailsend wrote:I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.
This statement is doubted by me. No detrimental usage of the passive voice has ever been observed by me.
Have a mirror.

bulbaquil
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 242
Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 2:31 pm

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by bulbaquil »

Legion wrote:
bulbaquil wrote:
Trailsend wrote:I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.
This statement is doubted by me. No detrimental usage of the passive voice has ever been observed by me.
Have a mirror.
I was being deliberately sarcastic :P
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!

Jashan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:26 am
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Jashan »

The passive voice has its uses. When I was teaching it to my ESL students, I focused primarily on the passive's uses in:

1) Obscuring the responsible agent
2) Expressing an unknown agent

and as teritary, sounding more formal in general.

The only reason I think passive is frowned upon is becuase it's "good style" [according to whom?] to use strong, active verbs [strong as in 'vivid mental images', not as in 'irregular'] over weaker verbs. That is, stylistically, you're encouraged to say "The man shattered the window" rather than the plainer "The man broke the window" or the even-weaker "The window was broken (by the man)."

However, anyone who cannot parse the simple rule that passive voice == the appropriate tense/form of "to be" + the past participle (thus ruling out things like "He was happy" or "He was going" or whatnot), should have no business being anywhere near a teacher position, much less actually correcting papers written in English :P
[quote="Xephyr"]Kitties: little happy factories.[/quote]

User avatar
Sevly
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 214
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:50 pm
Location: (x, y, z, t)

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Sevly »

I just read an entry on TVtropes about a guy whose elementary school teacher told him that a sentence should never begin with a pronoun. That's right, pronouns. Sevly thinks, from an example given, that the teacher was trying to stop students from using dummy subjects like 'it' in 'It was nice of you to come'. Presumably because such subjects introduce a copula right up there at the front of the sentence, which is the all-forbidden passive, of course. Ahem.

Bedelato
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:13 pm
Location: Another place

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Bedelato »

bulbaquil wrote:What's more is that it's not even something that can be excused by (c wut i did thar?) Latinophilia, as Latin had a passive voice.
Okay, I just have to say this:
According to traditional grammar, all languages are essentially Latin. :D

The next person who says "copula equals passive" is gonna hear from me. :x :D
At, casteda dus des ometh coisen at tusta o diédem thum čisbugan. Ai, thiosa če sane búem mos sil, ne?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?

User avatar
dhok
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by dhok »

Yeah, but the thing is that site's a comedy site.
I mean, "French is essentially a Romance language with Algonquian verb grammar."? That's a parody, not ignorance.

Bedelato
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 193
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:13 pm
Location: Another place

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by Bedelato »

dhokarena56 wrote:Yeah, but the thing is that site's a comedy site.
I mean, "French is essentially a Romance language with Algonquian verb grammar."? That's a parody, not ignorance.
I know it's a humor site. That's the point; I was intentionally making a joke. I was commenting on a previous point, not bringing up a new one.

By the way, I made up that line. It wasn't on the site.
At, casteda dus des ometh coisen at tusta o diédem thum čisbugan. Ai, thiosa če sane búem mos sil, ne?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2

Post by finlay »

and according to generative grammar, all languages are essentially english (that's the impression i always got, anyway :()

Post Reply