"Citation needed", indeed.The word Absheron (Abshiron) is an ancient combined word in Turkic-Azeri dialect meaning "healing sneeze" (Abshir + on = Abshiron). The area got that name because of its healthy nature
Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
From the Wikipedia article on the Absheron Peninsula in Azerbaijan:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
In The Origin and Progress of Language [James Burnett, also known as Lord Monboddo] painstakingly analyses the structure of primitive and modern languages that argues that mankind had evolved language skills in response to his changing environment and altering social structures. His work in language evolution departed radically from then existing theories. This analysis was totally remarkable, since Burnett was partially deaf. He was intrigued with the systematics he discovered in codifying a multitude of primitive languages. Burnett was the first to discover that primitive languages create unnecessarily lengthy words for rather simple concepts. He reasoned that in early languages there was an imperative for clarity, so that redundancy was built in and seemingly unnecessary syllables added. He concluded that this form of language evolved as a method of survival when clear communication might be the determinant of avoiding danger. He demonstrated that he was aware of the advantages to those peoples who could develop superior language skills. This quasi-evolutionary idea, whilst common today, was then unusual. Burnett himself was deeply religious and often digressed to credit God with the divine first mover concept as argued in a similar vein by Aristotle.
Monboddo studied in great detail the languages of peoples colonised by Europeans, including those of the Carib, Eskimo, Huron, Algonquian, Peruvian (Quechua?) and Tahitian peoples. He was the first to see the preponderance of polysyllabic words, where some of his predecessors had dismissed primitive language as a series of monosyllabic grunts. He also made the astute observation that in Huron (or Wyandot) the words for very similar objects are astoundingly different. This fact led Monboddo to understand that primitive peoples needed to communicate reliably regarding a more limited number of subjects than in modern civilizations, which led to the polysyllabic and redundant nature of many words. He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved. Partially this disparity arises from the greater vocabulary of modern languages and the decreased need for the polysyllabic content.
Monboddo also traced the evolution of modern European languages and gave particularly great effort to understanding the ancient Greek language, in which he was proficient. He argued that Greek is the most perfect language ever established because of its complex structure and tonality, rendering it capable of expressing a wide gamut of nuances. Monboddo was the first to formulate what is now known as the single-origin hypothesis, the theory that all human origin was from a single region of the earth; he reached this conclusion by reasoning from linguistic evolution (Jones, 1789). This theory is evidence of his thinking on the topic of the evolution of Man.
-- Wikipedia
Monboddo studied in great detail the languages of peoples colonised by Europeans, including those of the Carib, Eskimo, Huron, Algonquian, Peruvian (Quechua?) and Tahitian peoples. He was the first to see the preponderance of polysyllabic words, where some of his predecessors had dismissed primitive language as a series of monosyllabic grunts. He also made the astute observation that in Huron (or Wyandot) the words for very similar objects are astoundingly different. This fact led Monboddo to understand that primitive peoples needed to communicate reliably regarding a more limited number of subjects than in modern civilizations, which led to the polysyllabic and redundant nature of many words. He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved. Partially this disparity arises from the greater vocabulary of modern languages and the decreased need for the polysyllabic content.
Monboddo also traced the evolution of modern European languages and gave particularly great effort to understanding the ancient Greek language, in which he was proficient. He argued that Greek is the most perfect language ever established because of its complex structure and tonality, rendering it capable of expressing a wide gamut of nuances. Monboddo was the first to formulate what is now known as the single-origin hypothesis, the theory that all human origin was from a single region of the earth; he reached this conclusion by reasoning from linguistic evolution (Jones, 1789). This theory is evidence of his thinking on the topic of the evolution of Man.
-- Wikipedia
Sunàqʷa the Sea Lamprey says:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I know, English only has like, what, sixteen distinct vowel phonemes? We're starving here!Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
It's (broadly) [faɪ.ˈjuw.lɛ]
#define FEMALE
ConlangDictionary 0.3 3/15/14 (ZBB thread)
Quis vult in terra stare,
Cum possit volitare?
#define FEMALE
ConlangDictionary 0.3 3/15/14 (ZBB thread)
Quis vult in terra stare,
Cum possit volitare?
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Man, by that reasoning then...Salishan languages are pretty advanced. I like this.Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
-
- Smeric
- Posts: 1258
- Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:07 pm
- Location: Miracle, Inc. Headquarters
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
If I were a linguistics quack, I'd totally be for that...roninbodhisattva wrote:Man, by that reasoning then...Salishan languages are pretty advanced. I like this.Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
ʔu gʷəlapu haʔɬ siʔjaʔja... welcome good friends
[bɹ̠ˤʷɪs.təɫ]
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró
Nōn quālibet inīquā cupiditāte illectus hoc agō
Yo te pongo en tu lugar...
Taisc mach Daró
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Great, now some """postcolonialist""" quack is going to pick up on that and use it to say the evil Europeans destroyed the most advanced civilization on Earth.roninbodhisattva wrote:Man, by that reasoning then...Salishan languages are pretty advanced. I like this.Soap wrote:He was also apparently the first to establish that primitive languages are generally vowel rich; correspondingly, very late advanced languages such as German and English are vowel starved.
But I can't get a Berber Islamist joke to work out because Classical Arabic doesn't have batshit insane consonant clusters. Curses, foiled again!
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Pitty, isn't it?Nortaneous wrote:But I can't get a Berber Islamist joke to work out because Classical Arabic doesn't have batshit insane consonant clusters. Curses, foiled again!
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
quack quack quackWikipedia wrote:
In some cultures <h> is known as the Letter of the Gods and therefore was seen to have intrinsic properties.
A New Yorker wrote:Isn't it sort of a relief to talk about the English Premier League instead of the sad state of publishing?
Shtåså, Empotle7á, Neire WippwoAbi wrote:At this point it seems pretty apparent that PIE was simply an ancient esperanto gone awry.
- rickardspaghetti
- Avisaru
- Posts: 399
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 9:45 pm
- Location: Sweden
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
What source did they give for that one? c:
そうだ。死んでいる人も勃起することが出来る。
俺はその証だ。
俺はその証だ。
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I Googled "Letter of the Gods" and three of the five hits led me back to that article. Maybe I'll see if the same claim is in any of the foreign language versions.rickardspaghetti wrote:What source did they give for that one? c:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
This pains me so much.Bedelato wrote:Some teachers don't even know what the passive voice is.
I hate prescriptivists even more now... I at least thought that their rules made sense in some dialect or another.
This is atrocious.
After ordering a pint of his favorite ale, Robert was perplexed when the barmaid replied that the fishmonger was next door. The Great English Vowel Shift had begun.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Passive-paranoia is basically a genre unto itself in prescriptivism:Kuro no Mori wrote:This pains me so much.Bedelato wrote:Some teachers don't even know what the passive voice is.
I hate prescriptivists even more now... I at least thought that their rules made sense in some dialect or another.
This is atrocious.
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2470
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2474
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=2524
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas
– The Gospel of Thomas
- Nesescosac
- Avisaru
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:01 pm
- Location: ʃɪkagoʊ, ɪlənoj, ju ɛs eɪ, ə˞θ
- Contact:
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
My English teacher make this same mistake yesterday in class, and he will probably do the same today.Bedelato wrote:Some teachers don't even know what the passive voice is.
I did have a bizarrely similar (to the original poster's) accident about four years ago, in which I slipped over a cookie and somehow twisted my ankle so far that it broke
Aeetlrcreejl > Kicgan Vekei > me /ne.ses.tso.sats/What kind of cookie?
- roninbodhisattva
- Avisaru
- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
- Location: California
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
The fear of the passive is one of those things that makes me angry to no end. Fuckin' eh, I'll use the passive if it's goddamn appropriate. Calm the fuck down I'm not threatening the integrity of my own goddamn writing.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
What's more is that it's not even something that can be excused by (c wut i did thar?) Latinophilia, as Latin had a passive voice.
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.
Really bugs me when the literarily-minded start crusading against it without bothering first to learn what it is (and why "he was happy" is not it), though.
Really bugs me when the literarily-minded start crusading against it without bothering first to learn what it is (and why "he was happy" is not it), though.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
This statement is doubted by me. No detrimental usage of the passive voice has ever been observed by me.Trailsend wrote:I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Have a mirror.bulbaquil wrote:This statement is doubted by me. No detrimental usage of the passive voice has ever been observed by me.Trailsend wrote:I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I was being deliberately sarcasticLegion wrote:Have a mirror.bulbaquil wrote:This statement is doubted by me. No detrimental usage of the passive voice has ever been observed by me.Trailsend wrote:I think it's a useful exercise to practice avoiding passive voice, since (just like everything else) it can be overused to detrimental effect.
MI DRALAS, KHARULE MEVO STANI?!
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
The passive voice has its uses. When I was teaching it to my ESL students, I focused primarily on the passive's uses in:
1) Obscuring the responsible agent
2) Expressing an unknown agent
and as teritary, sounding more formal in general.
The only reason I think passive is frowned upon is becuase it's "good style" [according to whom?] to use strong, active verbs [strong as in 'vivid mental images', not as in 'irregular'] over weaker verbs. That is, stylistically, you're encouraged to say "The man shattered the window" rather than the plainer "The man broke the window" or the even-weaker "The window was broken (by the man)."
However, anyone who cannot parse the simple rule that passive voice == the appropriate tense/form of "to be" + the past participle (thus ruling out things like "He was happy" or "He was going" or whatnot), should have no business being anywhere near a teacher position, much less actually correcting papers written in English
1) Obscuring the responsible agent
2) Expressing an unknown agent
and as teritary, sounding more formal in general.
The only reason I think passive is frowned upon is becuase it's "good style" [according to whom?] to use strong, active verbs [strong as in 'vivid mental images', not as in 'irregular'] over weaker verbs. That is, stylistically, you're encouraged to say "The man shattered the window" rather than the plainer "The man broke the window" or the even-weaker "The window was broken (by the man)."
However, anyone who cannot parse the simple rule that passive voice == the appropriate tense/form of "to be" + the past participle (thus ruling out things like "He was happy" or "He was going" or whatnot), should have no business being anywhere near a teacher position, much less actually correcting papers written in English
[quote="Xephyr"]Kitties: little happy factories.[/quote]
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I just read an entry on TVtropes about a guy whose elementary school teacher told him that a sentence should never begin with a pronoun. That's right, pronouns. Sevly thinks, from an example given, that the teacher was trying to stop students from using dummy subjects like 'it' in 'It was nice of you to come'. Presumably because such subjects introduce a copula right up there at the front of the sentence, which is the all-forbidden passive, of course. Ahem.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Okay, I just have to say this:bulbaquil wrote:What's more is that it's not even something that can be excused by (c wut i did thar?) Latinophilia, as Latin had a passive voice.
According to traditional grammar, all languages are essentially Latin.
The next person who says "copula equals passive" is gonna hear from me.
At, casteda dus des ometh coisen at tusta o diédem thum čisbugan. Ai, thiosa če sane búem mos sil, ne?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
Yeah, but the thing is that site's a comedy site.
I mean, "French is essentially a Romance language with Algonquian verb grammar."? That's a parody, not ignorance.
I mean, "French is essentially a Romance language with Algonquian verb grammar."? That's a parody, not ignorance.
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
I know it's a humor site. That's the point; I was intentionally making a joke. I was commenting on a previous point, not bringing up a new one.dhokarena56 wrote:Yeah, but the thing is that site's a comedy site.
I mean, "French is essentially a Romance language with Algonquian verb grammar."? That's a parody, not ignorance.
By the way, I made up that line. It wasn't on the site.
At, casteda dus des ometh coisen at tusta o diédem thum čisbugan. Ai, thiosa če sane búem mos sil, ne?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
Also, I broke all your metal ropes and used them to feed the cheeseburgers. Yes, today just keeps getting better, doesn't it?
Re: Linguistic Quackery Thread, take 2
and according to generative grammar, all languages are essentially english (that's the impression i always got, anyway )