you are boring and a protestant. no wonder you like islam so much
oh, yeah, allahu akbar, baby, that's why I continually ramble about how it's a vile book filled with Holy Sadism that makes a point of gloating on how infidels will be horribly tortured every other verse, because I like islam so much.
though you MIGHT be right, it might just be that deep down I love islam and I feel guilty about loving islam so I say I don't like it so that Holy Dawkins won't send me to atheist hell. yeah, that must be it.
The guy who didn't read my footnote.
so I'm saying that something I don't like is fascism regardless of whether or not I say something is fascism because fascism stands for whatever I don't like? or, rather, by saying I don't like something then I don't like something.
You: "What are you a neocon, calling me an islamist sympathizer???"
or, rather, are you calling me a multiculturalist islamic sympathizer, pat condell style?
Oh, right, I see how that might mean that. I honestly didn't understand his post; it was [intended as] a question, not
a challenge, as the part about how the bible is important and filled with good stories that are really important everyone knows sounded like the issue was how the bible is good and the curan is bad and how can I think otherwise, when whereas much of the *content* of both I find silly sometimes, vile others, the form of one I happened to find more entretaining [perhaps on account of being more comprehensible] than the other.
also, Pat Condell is hardly a neocon.
Yeah, freedom of speech, who needs that?
so I'm advocating censorship now ? fascinating!