zompist bboard

My apologies too if we seem judgmental. I know I don't enjoy it when people point out writing issues in things I write. (Just the other day, some engineer claimed I had misplaced a comma. Hah! Boy did he get his fish warm.)

I am fervently enjoying ALC, and will continue to read anything you write, unless, like Fredrik Lindström, you stop making awesome linguistics books and start making weird poetry instead. When I occasionally find something that looks like it might be a misprint, or I have some other comment, I'm happy to point it out, to maybe help make a great book even better. Of course, I'm neither a professional linguist nor a native speaker of English, so most of the time I've probably just misunderstood things.

Here's one, for example: On ALC page 119, it says
"Not all transitives are alike: the experiencer in John swerved is a lot more active than the one in The window broke. ACTIVE-STATIVE or SPLIT-S languages treat the more..."

I'm wondering, a) should that be "Not all intransitives..."? and b) does that mean that "active-stative" and "split-S" are synonyms? I had previously understood "active-stative" to be synonymous with "split intransitive".

_________________

Zompist books feedback thread, post 24: "Editing work like this is an interesting past-time for me." past-time -> pastime.

Whilst I too find plural "here's", and "try and", extremely irritating, the real mark of an ill-educated writer is the belief that singular "they" is something that is "starting" to be used...

_________________
Blog:

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

Jeremy, where are you from? I'm wondering if this is a regional thing.

I think "there's" and "here's" are on the way to becoming an existential construction unmarked for plurality. A few random examples from Googling:

"There is a new handshake and a new salute."
"If there is a Higgs field and a Higgs boson (or 4 minus 2 ) doesn't that mean there is a Higgs force?"
"[T]here is a problem and a solution to the problem"
"By the end of the century there is a Portuguese trading station and a mission run by Augustinian friars."
"In every crisis there's a winner and a loser."
"We'll also discover that there's some issues and limitations with patterns that can be addressed by proper knowledge of frameworks."
"Here's some tips and tricks to keep your laptop battery healthy."
"[H]ere's some pen and ink drawings he did back when we lived in West Germany"
"Here’s a map and a quick explanation of where your drone can go."
"Here's a few of those bronze statues."
"And again, there's many things I wish in retrospect I could do differently, but I was scared."

What you're looking for when googling examples of usages is the number of hits. Again, it's not totally authoritative, but it does give an indication. To see that it does work, google something horribly incorrect.

COCA, yo. Or BNC if that's your thing.

PCK, page 44: the diagram which (I presume) shows the difference between a sidereal and a solar day is cut off at the bottom of the page. Perhaps post the full image on the PCK resources page as an errata?

I think Sal intended the emphasis to be on 'starting'.

I found what I think are a couple of typos in ALC over the past few weeks. Page numbers are from the Kindle edition:
p26: "can't think of the moment" appears to be missing "at"
p78: "favor" should probably be "flavor"

I'm getting a hardcover edition of the Language Construction Kit together, and the first step is to update the text. If there's any errors you've found, please mention them here or e-mail me ASAP.

_________________
- -

_________________
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
– The Gospel of Thomas

That's a good idea! I will look into the pricing.

I just read through this thread again, making corrections. It's amazing to me that I can read the same text multiple times and just not see some of these things. I don't know how proofreaders train their brains to find everything.

do you ever employ a second set of eyes

_________________
<Anaxandridas> How many artists do you know get paid?
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.

(Edited): Yes, this has occurred to me. I've had people read all my books before publication. As you'll see in the preface to about every academic book ever, the author remains responsible for any errors.

(If by "employ" you meant paying proofreaders, I don't have any money for that.)

naw I was just curious, I didn't mean to imply anything about hiring anyone

_________________
<Anaxandridas> How many artists do you know get paid?
<Anaxandridas> Seriously, name five.

_________________
Build it, and they will come.
Sell it, and they will buy.
Write it, and they will read.
Then they will stop looking over your shoulder once you want them to see it.

I got Advanced Language Construction. Is the font Linux Libertine? I have had it on a Windows computer before.

_________________
Hello there. Chirp chirp chirp.

Yep. I needed a font with all the IPA characters, and it was the nicest.

Re: The recent blog post

I hereby lobby for a Quechua grammar, and would be interested to know how near we are to seeing Hanying, if you have a forecast on that.