If natlangs were conlangs...

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Xephyr »

R.Rusanov wrote:I think he rather meant that Western Europe isn't a traditional zone for language isolates, unlike say the Laotian highland or Papua New Guinea.
It "isn't a traditional zone for language isolates" just in the sense that there's only one language isolate (plus a couple in the historical period). Which turns that argument into "Western Europe has 1 isolate, therefore Western Europe should not have 1 isolate".
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Torco
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2372
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 10:45 pm
Location: Santiago de Chile

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Torco »

Kind of: more like if i didn't know basque was a natlang, then i'd think western europe has no isolates, and when presented with an isolate in western europe, i'd go "ah, come on, really?"

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Nortaneous »

Iaai looks normal compared to dGudzong Tibetan, which has, in addition to voiceless and voiced fricatives at all seven places of articulation, voiceless nasals and resonants, and a full set of front rounded vowels contrasting with back unrounded vowels, preaspirated and postaspirated fricatives.

And when I say preaspirated and postaspirated I mean both at the same time.

There are four tones, but no known minimal pairs between the tones.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Dewrad
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 1040
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 9:02 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Dewrad »

R.Rusanov wrote:An interesting point I will make here is that highland, herding populations resist language assimilation very well.
Interesting, I'll mention that to some Gaelic speakers... oh wait.
Some useful Dravian links: Grammar - Lexicon - Ask a Dravian
Salmoneus wrote:(NB Dewrad is behaving like an adult - a petty, sarcastic and uncharitable adult, admittedly, but none the less note the infinitely higher quality of flame)

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Salmoneus »

Nortaneous wrote:Iaai looks normal compared to dGudzong Tibetan, which has, in addition to voiceless and voiced fricatives at all seven places of articulation, voiceless nasals and resonants, and a full set of front rounded vowels contrasting with back unrounded vowels, preaspirated and postaspirated fricatives.

And when I say preaspirated and postaspirated I mean both at the same time.

There are four tones, but no known minimal pairs between the tones.
Yeah, but how many possessives does it have?
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

User avatar
R.Rusanov
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:59 pm
Location: Novo-je Orĭlovo

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by R.Rusanov »

The Gaels got highland-clearanced away. Genocide does tend to invalidate the model, yes.
Slava, čĭstŭ, hrabrostĭ!

User avatar
Legion
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:56 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Legion »

Please stop talking about any subject which you don't know anything about. Which appears to be any subject but slavistics. Maybe.

User avatar
R.Rusanov
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 393
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 1:59 pm
Location: Novo-je Orĭlovo

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by R.Rusanov »

Thank you for the contribution friend :^)
Slava, čĭstŭ, hrabrostĭ!

User avatar
Herr Dunkel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: In this multiverse or another

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Herr Dunkel »

Batshit language?

Avestan. Little else to say.
sano wrote:
To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano

User avatar
Buran
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:28 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Buran »

The Salishan languages. Whose idea was it to have syllabic fricatives?

User avatar
Click
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 620
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:53 am

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Click »

Same goes for Miyako.

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Drydic »

Adjective Recoil wrote:The Salishan languages. Whose idea was it to have syllabic fricatives?
What do these two phrases have to do with each other?

But to answer your question, east asian langs is who.
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Nortaneous »

How many East Asian languages even have syllabic fricatives? Naxi, Yi, and Miyako are the only ones I can think of, unless you count the apical vowel, which adds Mandarin and Lisu. Apparently Hlepho Phowa has the apical vowel and syllabic /v/, though the latter contrasts only marginally with ɯ, which may be realized as a syllabic fricative or with significant labiodental frication -- like Nias, where the high vowel /u/ is often realized with labiodentalization instead of rounding.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Drydic »

Nortaneous wrote:How many East Asian languages even have syllabic fricatives? Naxi, Yi, and Miyako are the only ones I can think of, unless you count the apical vowel, which adds Mandarin and Lisu. Apparently Hlepho Phowa has the apical vowel and syllabic /v/, though the latter contrasts only marginally with ɯ, which may be realized as a syllabic fricative or with significant labiodental frication -- like Nias, where the high vowel /u/ is often realized with labiodentalization instead of rounding.
I was counting the apical vowel, but I can add Okinawan to the list with [f̩] (please do not ask me about phonemicity, I think the source claimed it was but I can't remember where I found the paper anymore).
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
Arzena
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 240
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2008 1:19 pm
Location: ¡California, Tejas, Marruecos!

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Arzena »

Arabic. Why do the newbs always try to make a triconsonantal root system. ugh
A New Yorker wrote:Isn't it sort of a relief to talk about the English Premier League instead of the sad state of publishing?
Abi wrote:At this point it seems pretty apparent that PIE was simply an ancient esperanto gone awry.
Shtåså, Empotle7á, Neire Wippwo

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Drydic »

More like Holy shit a noob got a triconsonantal language RIGHT FOR ONCE!!!.
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
faiuwle
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 512
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 12:26 am
Location: MA north shore

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by faiuwle »

This raises the question: if the original triconsonantal natlangs were conlangs, where's the precedent for how to do them correctly come from?
It's (broadly) [faɪ.ˈjuw.lɛ]
#define FEMALE

ConlangDictionary 0.3 3/15/14 (ZBB thread)

Quis vult in terra stare,
Cum possit volitare?

Astraios
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2974
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:38 am
Location: Israel

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Astraios »

Nessari wrote:More like Holy shit a noob got a triconsonantal language RIGHT FOR ONCE!!!.
Arabic's too regular to be right.

User avatar
ObsequiousNewt
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 434
Joined: Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:05 pm
Location: /ˈaɪ̯əwʌ/

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by ObsequiousNewt »

Iau.

"Whoah, look how many different tones are used in natlangs! I think I'm going to put them all into one language! Also, more than one tone can be on a vowel. Whatever that means.

Hmm... not kitchen-sinky enough; let's add nasalization, but *only* put it on /a/, so it's not phonemic.

Hmm, still not kitchen-sinky enough. Let's give it three varieties of /i/, one of which is actually fricated, but not include any /e/.

Hmm, still not a KSL. Let's give it only six consonants. Also, allophones are cool, so /f/ is going to have allophones of /h~x~p/, because that totally makes sense rite?"


Ο ορανς τα ανα̨ριθομον ϝερρον εͱεν ανθροποτροφον.
Το̨ ανθροπς αυ̨τ εκψον επ αθο̨ οραναμο̨ϝον.
Θαιν. Θαιν. Θαιν. Θαιν. Θαιν. Θαιν. Θαιν.

cromulant
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:12 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by cromulant »

The languages of Europe all seem rather European, what with all the voiced fricatives and voicing as the only phonation distinction and whatnot. Not that there's anything wrong with that IF that's what you're trying to do. It's just that we don't know whether this was a conscious choice or the result of blind ignorance (sadly, the latter is all too often the case).

The creator of the languages of Europe may wish to consult this thread to get some ideas flowing.

User avatar
Legion
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:56 pm

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Legion »

This is turning into the Tautology Thread rather rapidly.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Thry »

We should actually make that thread.

User avatar
Nesescosac
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 314
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:01 pm
Location: ʃɪkagoʊ, ɪlənoj, ju ɛs eɪ, ə˞θ
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Nesescosac »

ObsequiousNewt wrote:Iau.

"Whoah, look how many different tones are used in natlangs! I think I'm going to put them all into one language! Also, more than one tone can be on a vowel. Whatever that means.

Hmm... not kitchen-sinky enough; let's add nasalization, but *only* put it on /a/, so it's not phonemic.

Hmm, still not kitchen-sinky enough. Let's give it three varieties of /i/, one of which is actually fricated, but not include any /e/.

Hmm, still not a KSL. Let's give it only six consonants. Also, allophones are cool, so /f/ is going to have allophones of /h~x~p/, because that totally makes sense rite?"

Well, now you've got me curious, but it seems there are multiple languages called Lau. Which is it?
I did have a bizarrely similar (to the original poster's) accident about four years ago, in which I slipped over a cookie and somehow twisted my ankle so far that it broke
What kind of cookie?
Aeetlrcreejl > Kicgan Vekei > me /ne.ses.tso.sats/

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by Drydic »

Nesescosac wrote:
ObsequiousNewt wrote:Iau.

"Whoah, look how many different tones are used in natlangs! I think I'm going to put them all into one language! Also, more than one tone can be on a vowel. Whatever that means.

Hmm... not kitchen-sinky enough; let's add nasalization, but *only* put it on /a/, so it's not phonemic.

Hmm, still not kitchen-sinky enough. Let's give it three varieties of /i/, one of which is actually fricated, but not include any /e/.

Hmm, still not a KSL. Let's give it only six consonants. Also, allophones are cool, so /f/ is going to have allophones of /h~x~p/, because that totally makes sense rite?"

Well, now you've got me curious, but it seems there are multiple languages called Lau. Which is it?
<iau> is different from <Lau>
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: If natlangs were conlangs...

Post by ol bofosh »

I also thought it was <L> not <i>.
It was about time I changed this.

Post Reply