A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:05 am
A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Looking at the IPA vowel chart, there seems to be a missing vowel that prevents it from being symmetrical. There is a near-open front vowel, æ, a near open mid-vowel, ɐ, but not near-open back vowel. Why? Does this vowel exist theoretically, or is there some reason it can't exist? Would you write it as ɔ̞ or ɔɒ (should be a digraph there)?
Edit: whoops wrong symbol
Edit: whoops wrong symbol
Last edited by sunandshadow on Sun Jan 05, 2014 10:38 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̝ or ɔɒ
I expect the reason it lacks a symbol is that /æ/ is used in RP English and possibly other languages whereas there are no famous languages with this. ɔ̞ would be used for this. ɔ̝ is for raising, not lowering. And digraphs are basically foreign to IPA.
Also, have some gherkins and chai!
Also, have some gherkins and chai!
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:05 am
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Oh I copied the wrong symbol. *blush* let me just edit that...
And thanks! *helps self to pickles and tea*
And thanks! *helps self to pickles and tea*
- Hallow XIII
- Avisaru
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:40 pm
- Location: Under Heaven
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Yes, the IPA chart is not symmetrical and generally thinking of the symbols on it as anything but very vague representations of sounds kept apart in different languages leads to insanity. For most of the things that are left out the reasoning for this is that there is no language that makes use of it (or that it's uncommon; in many cases it's a bit arbitrary or misguided though -- for instance, their persistent refusal to cultivate distinct symbols for alveolo-palatal and dorsal-palatal consonants is a perennial favorite).
Anyway. Hello, have some pickles and tea, and direct your attention to the list of good resources for people getting started. Oh wait. We don't have such a thing. Well, some day.
Anyway. Hello, have some pickles and tea, and direct your attention to the list of good resources for people getting started. Oh wait. We don't have such a thing. Well, some day.
陳第 wrote:蓋時有古今,地有南北;字有更革,音有轉移,亦勢所必至。
Read all about my excellent conlangsR.Rusanov wrote:seks istiyorum
sex want-PRS-1sg
Basic Conlanging Advice
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
I think my <lot>-vowel is somewhere between /ɒ/ and /ɔ/. But anyway, I agree with the preceding poster:
However, it would be unlikely for a language to contrast /ɔ/ and/or /ɒ/ with some intermediate vowel (unless something else such as length is involved) - since back vowels are generally more difficult to tell apart than front vowels.
/ɔ/ or /ɒ/ can serve well as broad or phonemic representations of the <lot>-vowel. If phonetic detail is needed, one can write [ɔ̞] or [ɒ̝].Hallow XIII wrote:Yes, the IPA chart is not symmetrical and generally thinking of the symbols on it as anything but very vague representations of sounds kept apart in different languages leads to insanity.
However, it would be unlikely for a language to contrast /ɔ/ and/or /ɒ/ with some intermediate vowel (unless something else such as length is involved) - since back vowels are generally more difficult to tell apart than front vowels.
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
I did attempt to answer this, but I think it got a bit convoluted. Either way, it was basically what Ngohe said (although Ngohe said it in a way much better than I possibly could )
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.
- Salmoneus
- Sanno
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: One of the dark places of the world
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Such a symbol would only be needed for languages that had three low, fully back, all equally rounded, equally long vowels with equal tongue root advancement, sulcalisation, pharyngealisation, voicing and so forth. Show me a language that has three low, fully back, all equally rounded, equally long vowels with equal tongue root advancement, sulcalisation, pharyngealisation, voicing and so forth, and then we'll talk about what symbols to use to represent them...
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:05 am
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
@Salmoneus What about describing the sounds of a language so someone unfamiliar with that language can pronounce it properly? If I used ɔ, which the language doesn't actually have, then anyone reading my "pronunciation guide" would actually be pronouncing the language wrong.
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
You'd annotate it. Something like "the sound denoted /ɔ/ in the table above has a slightly lower realisation than cardinal /ɔ/, closer in height to that of cardinal /æ/" for example.
Salmoneus wrote:(NB Dewrad is behaving like an adult - a petty, sarcastic and uncharitable adult, admittedly, but none the less note the infinitely higher quality of flame)
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:05 am
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
I feel like I understand better now how this stuff with the IPA creating symbols and using them to communicate sounds works. ^_^ I was under the mistaken impression that it was objective and more or less perfect because it's such a widely agreed-on authority and has been for years, but instead it seems to be more of a "we made it up as we went along and it mostly works" kind of system.
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Just wait until you start looking at theories of syntax!
Salmoneus wrote:(NB Dewrad is behaving like an adult - a petty, sarcastic and uncharitable adult, admittedly, but none the less note the infinitely higher quality of flame)
- Salmoneus
- Sanno
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: One of the dark places of the world
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
The key is just that there are an infinite number of possible vowels, because they exist in a continuum, not a series of discrete positions. It's impossible to identify an infinite number of things 'perfectly' with a finite (and indeed quite small) set of symbols. Even if it were, it would be counterproductive, because the actual realisation of vowels varies between dialects, between men and women, between adults and children sometimes, between individuals, depending on phonological context, probably depending on prosody and pragmatically-determined speech style, and so on.sunandshadow wrote:I feel like I understand better now how this stuff with the IPA creating symbols and using them to communicate sounds works. ^_^ I was under the mistaken impression that it was objective and more or less perfect because it's such a widely agreed-on authority and has been for years, but instead it seems to be more of a "we made it up as we went along and it mostly works" kind of system.
The symbol we use to describe the vowels is therefore just meant to give you a general idea of whereabouts the sound most often is. But the details of that 'whereabouts' will vary between languages, dialects, populations and so on.
More pedantic descriptions may give extra detail, as Dew shows, and if the vowels are being discussed specifically you'll often get a diagram showing the general location of the vowels within the vowel-space.
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Wait until you find out that ʌ is basically never used in its cardinal position, and that ɐ is all over a triangle extending south from schwa. Which, itself, according to many people can never ever ever be stressed, because then it would be ʌ!sunandshadow wrote:I feel like I understand better now how this stuff with the IPA creating symbols and using them to communicate sounds works. ^_^ I was under the mistaken impression that it was objective and more or less perfect because it's such a widely agreed-on authority and has been for years, but instead it seems to be more of a "we made it up as we went along and it mostly works" kind of system.
And you don't even want to know how bad a is.
-
- Sanci
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:05 am
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Eheh, I have to finish my consonants before I can delve into syntax. I'm looking forward to syntax though, because my original inspirations for what the language could be like mostly fall into that category.
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Except that Inland North dialects do use [ʌ], both for the traditional stressed /ʌ/ and for most (but not typically all) instances of the /ɑ/ in /ɑr/ before a voiceless obtruent!Nessari wrote:Wait until you find out that ʌ is basically never used in its cardinal position, and that ɐ is all over a triangle extending south from schwa. Which, itself, according to many people can never ever ever be stressed, because then it would be ʌ!sunandshadow wrote:I feel like I understand better now how this stuff with the IPA creating symbols and using them to communicate sounds works. ^_^ I was under the mistaken impression that it was objective and more or less perfect because it's such a widely agreed-on authority and has been for years, but instead it seems to be more of a "we made it up as we went along and it mostly works" kind of system.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
I am disagree: You can work on all parts of your language at any time you feel like it. You don't need to do it in a specific order. This was a mistake I made when I started conlanging (even if I don't really have much in the way of conwork to show I've learnt from it).sunandshadow wrote:Eheh, I have to finish my consonants before I can delve into syntax. I'm looking forward to syntax though, because my original inspirations for what the language could be like mostly fall into that category.
One might think that it's doesn't work to do syntax or morphology before phonology and phonetics are finished because you don't which forms you are using yet but you can always go back and change your words later, or else leave algebra-like placeholders and come back to it. Or even just be a bit vague in your morphosyntax initially and then fill in the details when you've completed the sound aspects.
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
Yeah, nowadays I *start* with syntax more or less. Syntax affects prosody which affects phonology.
vec
- Drydic
- Smeric
- Posts: 1652
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
- Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
- Contact:
Re: A near-open back vowel? ɔ̞ or ɔɒ
I just don't treat anything as set in stone until I have at least 5 pages' worth of material. And it's not automatic then either. Actually I just don't treat a whole lot as set in stone.