The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
User avatar
WeepingElf
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1630
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by WeepingElf »

zompist wrote:
linguoboy wrote:So probably all of you have looked as the name "Westeros" and had the same thought: looks like a PIE word. Anyone played around with the etymology at all? I guess the most plausible root is *wes- "stay, dwell", but there are plenty of other possibilities, including some which incorporate *wekʷsperos somehow.
Given that we have Westeros in the West, Essos in the East, and Sothoryos int he South, I think the answer is "Martin isn't a very good conlanger."
I think Martin said so himself. And that's why HBO hired David Peterson.
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A

Astraios
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2974
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:38 am
Location: Israel

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Astraios »

linguoboy wrote:I've spent an inordinate amount of time over the years trying to backetymologise terrible conlanging. I actually kind of enjoy it.
I remember being so excited finding a conlang in the Eragon books, and then getting really cross when I realised it was a cipher.

User avatar
KathTheDragon
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:48 am
Location: Brittania

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by KathTheDragon »

Same. I even spent hours trying and trying to decipher the grammar, then discovered there wasn't much of one.

User avatar
Sleinad Flar
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Coriovallum, Germania Inferior

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Sleinad Flar »

KathAveara wrote:On a tangent, how likely is it that the 3pl ending -ént(i) ~ -nt(i) derives from an older 3pl looking something like -én- ~ -n- to which the 3s ending -t(i) was suffixed?
Not that unlikely, especially because there is also a 3rd plural ending -r or -rs (mostly found in the 'perfect' conjugation, as evidenced by a.o. Latin -ere and -erunt, Hittite preterite -er and Sanskrit -uh.) and r/n-alternation is also known from the nominal heteroclitic declension (type Latin femur, femininis and Hittite eshar, ishanas). Active -ti/-n-ti would also match up with middle -o/-r-o.

(I remain skeptical though; it simply looks to good to be true.)
"Was ist ist, was nicht ist ist möglich"
http://sleinadflar.deviantart.com

User avatar
KathTheDragon
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:48 am
Location: Brittania

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by KathTheDragon »

As if by magic, whilst working on a diachronic dictionary for my IE family, I found this attestation from the Rig Veda in Morrígan's spreadsheat: abibhran [3pl.impf.act.] 'to carry'. Looks to be *e-bʱi-bʱr-o/e-n to me. Chances are, though, this is too good to be true.

User avatar
Sleinad Flar
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Coriovallum, Germania Inferior

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Sleinad Flar »

Ah, but Sanskrit simply deletes final -t here, as -nt isn't a permissible termination in that language. See for example also the participles and nt-stem adjectives (bharan, bharantam < *bhéronts, *bhérontm). As a result, -an has become the regular secondary 3pl ending in Sanskrit.
"Was ist ist, was nicht ist ist möglich"
http://sleinadflar.deviantart.com

User avatar
KathTheDragon
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:48 am
Location: Brittania

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by KathTheDragon »

Aw, that's a bummer.

User avatar
Chagen
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:54 pm

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Chagen »

zompist wrote:
linguoboy wrote:So probably all of you have looked as the name "Westeros" and had the same thought: looks like a PIE word. Anyone played around with the etymology at all? I guess the most plausible root is *wes- "stay, dwell", but there are plenty of other possibilities, including some which incorporate *wekʷsperos somehow.
Given that we have Westeros in the West, Essos in the East, and Sothoryos int he South, I think the answer is "Martin isn't a very good conlanger."
The utter lack of respect fantasy authors give to conlanging when they frequently spend pages masturbating over incredibly minute and useless historical accuracy can drive me into a deep deep depression at times.
Nūdhrēmnāva naraśva, dṛk śraṣrāsit nūdhrēmanīṣṣ iźdatīyyīm woḥīm madhēyyaṣṣi.
satisfaction-DEF.SG-LOC live.PERFECTIVE-1P.INCL but work-DEF.SG-PRIV satisfaction-DEF.PL.NOM weakeness-DEF.PL-DAT only lead-FUT-3P

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Zaarin »

Chagen wrote:
zompist wrote:
linguoboy wrote:So probably all of you have looked as the name "Westeros" and had the same thought: looks like a PIE word. Anyone played around with the etymology at all? I guess the most plausible root is *wes- "stay, dwell", but there are plenty of other possibilities, including some which incorporate *wekʷsperos somehow.
Given that we have Westeros in the West, Essos in the East, and Sothoryos int he South, I think the answer is "Martin isn't a very good conlanger."
The utter lack of respect fantasy authors give to conlanging when they frequently spend pages masturbating over incredibly minute and useless historical accuracy can drive me into a deep deep depression at times.
Indeed. Since Welsh was an inspiration for Sindarin, it seems like most fantasy since has operated under the assumption that "really bad Welsh = fantasy!!! lulz" :(
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

TaylorS
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 557
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by TaylorS »

Zaarin wrote:
Chagen wrote:
zompist wrote:
linguoboy wrote:So probably all of you have looked as the name "Westeros" and had the same thought: looks like a PIE word. Anyone played around with the etymology at all? I guess the most plausible root is *wes- "stay, dwell", but there are plenty of other possibilities, including some which incorporate *wekʷsperos somehow.
Given that we have Westeros in the West, Essos in the East, and Sothoryos int he South, I think the answer is "Martin isn't a very good conlanger."
The utter lack of respect fantasy authors give to conlanging when they frequently spend pages masturbating over incredibly minute and useless historical accuracy can drive me into a deep deep depression at times.
Indeed. Since Welsh was an inspiration for Sindarin, it seems like most fantasy since has operated under the assumption that "really bad Welsh = fantasy!!! lulz" :(
Really bad Welsh spiced with apostrophes.

User avatar
Particles the Greek
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 1:48 am
Location: Between clauses

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Particles the Greek »

TaylorS wrote:
Zaarin wrote:
Chagen wrote:
zompist wrote:
linguoboy wrote:So probably all of you have looked as the name "Westeros" and had the same thought: looks like a PIE word. Anyone played around with the etymology at all? I guess the most plausible root is *wes- "stay, dwell", but there are plenty of other possibilities, including some which incorporate *wekʷsperos somehow.
Given that we have Westeros in the West, Essos in the East, and Sothoryos int he South, I think the answer is "Martin isn't a very good conlanger."
The utter lack of respect fantasy authors give to conlanging when they frequently spend pages masturbating over incredibly minute and useless historical accuracy can drive me into a deep deep depression at times.
Indeed. Since Welsh was an inspiration for Sindarin, it seems like most fantasy since has operated under the assumption that "really bad Welsh = fantasy!!! lulz" :(
Really bad Welsh spiced with apostrophes.
Or, worse, Irish translated word-for-word with a dictionary and ignorance of the difference between nouns and verbs.
Non fidendus est crocodilus quis posteriorem dentem acerbum conquetur.

User avatar
Zaarin
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1136
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:00 pm

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Zaarin »

araceli wrote:Or, worse, Irish translated word-for-word with a dictionary and ignorance of the difference between nouns and verbs.
And if you're not in a Celtic mood, bad Latin will do just as well. Just take common words and ad "-us" to them. Also works for Sith lords, apparently. Or, as with Irish, translate word-for-word with no respect to case or declension or conjugation.
"But if of ships I now should sing, what ship would come to me,
What ship would bear me ever back across so wide a Sea?”

User avatar
Ryan of Tinellb
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:10 am

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Ryan of Tinellb »

"Burns Verkaufen Der Kraftwerk".
High Lulani and other conlangs at tinellb.com

User avatar
Ryan of Tinellb
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 56
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 9:10 am

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Ryan of Tinellb »

Anyway, the reason I came to this thread tonight was to post something amusing I found trying to find the PIE word for 'colo(u)r'. I did a quick search on this board and it doesn't look like anyone's mentioned it before.

http://www.academia.edu/3287583/PIE_Roo ... _Code_2.0_

This document posits the concept that all PIE roots were phonosthemic, i.e., that each phoneme in a word has an associated meaning. For example, initial /*p/ means 'body' / 'accumulation', and final /*n/ means 'complete' / 'end' / 'sound'.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by jal »

This document posits the concept that all PIE roots were phonosthemic, i.e., that each phoneme in a word has an associated meaning. For example, initial /*p/ means 'body' / 'accumulation', and final /*n/ means 'complete' / 'end' / 'sound'.
I call bullshit, without knowing anything about Indo European.


JAL

User avatar
sangi39
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 402
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:34 am
Location: North Yorkshire, UK

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by sangi39 »

jal wrote:
This document posits the concept that all PIE roots were phonosthemic, i.e., that each phoneme in a word has an associated meaning. For example, initial /*p/ means 'body' / 'accumulation', and final /*n/ means 'complete' / 'end' / 'sound'.
I call bullshit, without knowing anything about Indo European.


JAL
It also seems, although it's not entirely clear, that the writer classes Basque as an IE language.

Also, what exactly are the m-acute and r-acute they're talking about? I've never seen them in PIE except as stressed syllabic consonants, but the description the writer gives seems to be different from this?
You can tell the same lie a thousand times,
But it never gets any more true,
So close your eyes once more and once more believe
That they all still believe in you.
Just one time.

User avatar
KathTheDragon
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2139
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:48 am
Location: Brittania

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by KathTheDragon »

m-acute is apparently an n-like consonant which IE merged with m, but Iberian kept distinct. They say that Iberian's IE too (at some level) so yeah. I didn't look far enough to get to r-acute.

Richard W
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:28 pm

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Richard W »

sangi39 wrote:Also, what exactly are the m-acute and r-acute they're talking about? I've never seen them in PIE except as stressed syllabic consonants, but the description the writer gives seems to be different from this?
The precursors of <ḿ> and <ŕ> in Iberian and <n> and <r> or <rr> in Basque. Villamor doesn't offer a phonetic reconstruction for PIE. If there be any merit in his analysis, I suggest [ŋ] or [ɲ] for his *ḿ.

Richard W
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 363
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 8:28 pm

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Richard W »

The guess is that Iberian <r> and <ŕ> are trill and flap, but which is which is unknown. Villamor’s posits a correspondence with Basque <r> and <rr>, but has not sorted out the correspondence of the rhotics. It is obviously an impossible problem to solve if Basque, Iberian and IE are unrelated.

User avatar
Herr Dunkel
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1088
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 3:21 pm
Location: In this multiverse or another

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Herr Dunkel »

sangi39 wrote:
jal wrote:
This document posits the concept that all PIE roots were phonosthemic, i.e., that each phoneme in a word has an associated meaning. For example, initial /*p/ means 'body' / 'accumulation', and final /*n/ means 'complete' / 'end' / 'sound'.
I call bullshit, without knowing anything about Indo European.


JAL
It also seems, although it's not entirely clear, that the writer classes Basque as an IE language.

Also, what exactly are the m-acute and r-acute they're talking about? I've never seen them in PIE except as stressed syllabic consonants, but the description the writer gives seems to be different from this?
Indo-European monks transcribing Aquitanian?
sano wrote:
To my dearest Darkgamma,
http://www.dazzlejunction.com/greetings/thanks/thank-you-bear.gif
Sincerely,
sano

User avatar
marconatrix
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 234
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 4:29 pm
Location: Kernow
Contact:

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by marconatrix »

CatDoom wrote:
zompist wrote:Given that we have Westeros in the West, Essos in the East, and Sothoryos int he South, I think the answer is "Martin isn't a very good conlanger."
Considering that, by his own admission, his usual strategy for coming up with names in the setting is to take a real world name and change a vowel or two (if that), I don't think it's a big priority of his. As far as I can recall, the only example of spoken Valyrian he gives in the books is "Valar Morghulis," which is an almost hilariously transparent reference to the Silmarillion.

I suspect Martin is more of a history buff than a linguist, considering that the first three books borrow a number of plot points from the English War of the Roses, though they're mixed up with a bunch of other stuff and blenderized into a sort of quasi-historical chutney.
No idea what this is all about until I Google, but maybe the guy went to Wester Ross and liked the place ;-)
Kyn nag ov den skentel pur ...

User avatar
Terra
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 571
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 10:01 am

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Terra »

Anyway, the reason I came to this thread tonight was to post something amusing I found trying to find the PIE word for 'colo(u)r'. I did a quick search on this board and it doesn't look like anyone's mentioned it before.

http://www.academia.edu/3287583/PIE_Roo ... e_Code_2.0_

This document posits the concept that all PIE roots were phonosthemic, i.e., that each phoneme in a word has an associated meaning. For example, initial /*p/ means 'body' / 'accumulation', and final /*n/ means 'complete' / 'end' / 'sound'.
This man seems to aspire to be even more ridiculous than Edo Nyland.

User avatar
WeepingElf
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1630
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by WeepingElf »

Terra wrote:
Anyway, the reason I came to this thread tonight was to post something amusing I found trying to find the PIE word for 'colo(u)r'. I did a quick search on this board and it doesn't look like anyone's mentioned it before.

http://www.academia.edu/3287583/PIE_Roo ... e_Code_2.0_

This document posits the concept that all PIE roots were phonosthemic, i.e., that each phoneme in a word has an associated meaning. For example, initial /*p/ means 'body' / 'accumulation', and final /*n/ means 'complete' / 'end' / 'sound'.
This man seems to aspire to be even more ridiculous than Edo Nyland.
So PIE was an oligosynthetic taxonomic language? I don't know wherther it is more ridiculous than Edo Nyland, but it is at least comparable. 800 millinylands at the minimum!
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A

Neek
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 355
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 12:13 pm
Location: im itësin
Contact:

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by Neek »

It's not really that an absurd notion if you have no meaningful linguistic experience at all. I think Nyland takes the case with just how ridiculous and impossibly idiotic it sounds to both the lay person and the informed and educated.

User avatar
WeepingElf
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1630
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Re: The Great Proto-Indo-European Thread

Post by WeepingElf »

Neek wrote:It's not really that an absurd notion if you have no meaningful linguistic experience at all. I think Nyland takes the case with just how ridiculous and impossibly idiotic it sounds to both the lay person and the informed and educated.
Sure. So Villamor's idea is worth perhaps just 500 millinylands. But he is certainly considerably nuttier than Octaviano!
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A

Post Reply