Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
TaylorS
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 557
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 1:44 pm
Location: Moorhead, MN, USA

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by TaylorS »

Speaking of tone, I have noticed that along with English vowels preceding lenis/voiced consonants being longer than those preceding fortis/unvoiced consonants, there is a tone difference as well. So the vowel in "lift" has a high tone and "lived" has a low tone.

In Future English I have made this tone distinction phonemic by collapsing all coda fortis plosives to /ʔ/, and by de-voicing coda voiced fricatives.

Seirios
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 6:26 am
Location: Shenzhen, Guangdong, China

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by Seirios »

In my Mandarin speech (and my family's), /ar/ > [ᴀˤʴ] while /air//anr/ > [ɐ˞ɻ].

Edit: Now I'm pretty sure that the rhotic part of /ar/ includes both radical and postalveolar, not alveolar as shown by IPA. A previously mistaken IPA expression is fixed and labelled red.

All of the "alveolar" /ɹ/ means postalveolar /ɹ̠˔/, while [˞] means alveolar. This is purely due to display reasons.

And to be more ridiculously small, when preceded by /i/ or /u/, the radical part in /ar/ may be omitted.
Last edited by Seirios on Mon Nov 03, 2014 1:51 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Always an adventurer, I guess.
-
Tone: Chao's notation.
Apical vowels: [ɿ]≈[z̞̩], [ʅ]≈[ɻ̞̩], [ʮ]≈[z̞̩ʷ], [ʯ]≈[ɻ̞̩ʷ].
Vowels: [ᴇ]=Mid front unrounded, [ᴀ]=Open central unrounded, [ⱺ]=Mid back rounded, [ⱻ]=Mid back unrounded.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by Nortaneous »

What's that one dialect of that one Caucasian language that contrasts pharyngeals and epiglottals?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

cntrational
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:14 pm

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by cntrational »

finlay wrote:diphthongized, and no, I've only heard anecdotally of English dialects that maintain(ed) a difference between eː and eɪ. I doubt they still exist. Generally they are heard as equivalent, although it's a marker of various regional accents.
Well, my (Indian) English contrasts /eɪ/ and /eː/ -- but only in loanwords from Indian languages. [ɛɪ] is the usual realization of the former.

For the record, there's no /oʊ/ /oː/ constrast -- /oʊ/ is [oː].

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by finlay »

That's different, though - i'm talking about maintaining an early modern or middle english distinction. I can't remember exactly, but I think it's something like tale as /te:l/ and tail as /teil/ - there are some accents in like yorkshire or norfolk that still keep the distinction...maybe.

User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by Pole, the »

Seirios wrote:In my Mandarin speech (and my family's), /ar/ > [ᴀˤʴ] while /air//anr/ > [ɐɻ].
What is [ᴀ]?
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

cntrational
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 12:14 pm

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by cntrational »

Pole, the wrote:
Seirios wrote:In my Mandarin speech (and my family's), /ar/ > [ᴀˤʴ] while /air//anr/ > [ɐɻ].
What is [ᴀ]?
Commonly used in Sinitic linguistics to indicate a low central vowel. [ä] in IPA proper.

User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: Ridiculously small phonemic differences thread

Post by Pole, the »

Ok, thanks.
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

Post Reply