Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
-
Αυτοβοτα
- Lebom
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:22 pm
Post
by Αυτοβοτα »
I saw a short paper linked here that gave an overview of a language with a minimal inventory.
The inventory was this, IIRC:
/m n/ *EDIT: no nasals
/p t k ʔ/
/s/
/β ɾ ɣ/
maybe /h/ *EDIT: yes
/a e i o u/
/ɾ/: [ɾ~l~d]
*ti
si
s̩
There was some description of word construction as well.
I can't find the post/paper anymore. Anybody know the name or know where I can find the paper?
*EDIT:
the paper
Last edited by
Αυτοβοτα on Tue Apr 12, 2016 1:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
-_-_Aftovota_-_-
-
Hakaku
- Lebom
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 12:55 pm
- Location: 常世
Post
by Hakaku »
-
Pole, the
- Smeric
- Posts: 1606
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am
Post
by Pole, the »
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
-
Nortaneous
- Sumerul
- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Post
by Nortaneous »
The only language in that table with both /G/ and /?/ is Rapoisi.
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
-
Αυτοβοτα
- Lebom
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Aug 27, 2014 11:22 pm
Post
by Αυτοβοτα »
Aha! It is Rapoisi! But no nasals. Thanks, Nort.
The
thread/post, the
paper, where I remembered the amusingly empty consonant table.
-_-_Aftovota_-_-
