Ancient Greek phonology / diachronics

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
Post Reply
User avatar
Zhen Lin
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:59 am

Ancient Greek phonology / diachronics

Post by Zhen Lin »

I have a few questions:

1. It is mentioned that Attic/Ionic raised /a a:/ to /e E:/ - under what conditions?

2. It appears to me that /y/ does not occur as a final vowel - is this so, and why?

3. Does /n/ regularly disappear before /s/?

4. What are the sandhi rules (in phonological and spelling terms)? I know, for instance, that /np nk/ becomes [mp Nk], spelt /mp gk/. What about combinations such as /pm tm km pn tn kn/ etc.?
書不盡言、言不盡意

User avatar
Twpsyn Pentref
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2004 10:24 am
Location: that other Cambridge

Re: Ancient Greek phonology / diachronics

Post by Twpsyn Pentref »

Zhen Lin wrote:2. It appears to me that /y/ does not occur as a final vowel - is this so, and why?
πολύ, δόρυ, ἄστυ
So take this body at sunset to the great stream whose pulses start in the blue hills, and let these ashes drift from the Long Bridge where only a late gull breaks that deep and populous grave.

User avatar
alice
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Three of them

Re: Ancient Greek phonology / diachronics

Post by alice »

Zhen Lin wrote:1. It is mentioned that Attic/Ionic raised /a a:/ to /e E:/ - under what conditions?
Everywhere except after /e i r/.
Zhen Lin wrote:Does /n/ regularly disappear before /s/?
Yes, and I think it lengthens the preceding vowel.
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.

User avatar
dhok
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 859
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 7:39 pm
Location: The Eastern Establishment

Post by dhok »

Also, where did /b/ come from? (Other than 40-year-old porn addicts, we knew that.) My (very poor) understanding of Ancient Greek plosives (disregarding the various flavors of velar, they're not important for this) is:

PIE /p t k/>/p t k/
PIE /b d g/ >/b d g/
PIE /bh dh gh/ >/ph th kh/

but PIE was exceptionally rare in /b/, while it's quite common in Ancient Greek.
Last edited by dhok on Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:00 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Io
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 591
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 5:00 am
Location: a.s.l. p.l.s.
Contact:

Post by Io »

Daquarious P. McFizzle wrote:Also, where did /b/ come from? (Other than 40-year-old porn addicts, we knew that.)
Huh?!? Is that a weird reference to 4chan's /b/?!

A lot of /b/s in Greek came from mp > mb > b, but no idea about the word initial and others.
<King> Ivo, you phrase things in the most comedic manner

[quote="Jal"][quote="jme"]Thats just rude and unneeded.[/quote]That sums up Io, basically. Yet, we all love him.[/quote]

User avatar
WeepingElf
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1630
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:00 pm
Location: Braunschweig, Germany
Contact:

Post by WeepingElf »

Io wrote:
Daquarious P. McFizzle wrote:Also, where did /b/ come from? (Other than 40-year-old porn addicts, we knew that.)
Huh?!? Is that a weird reference to 4chan's /b/?!

A lot of /b/s in Greek came from mp > mb > b, but no idea about the word initial and others.
That's Modern Greek. Daquarious asked about Ancient Greek.
...brought to you by the Weeping Elf
Tha cvastam émi cvastam santham amal phelsa. -- Friedrich Schiller
ESTAR-3SG:P human-OBJ only human-OBJ true-OBJ REL-LOC play-3SG:A

User avatar
alice
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Three of them

Post by alice »

Daquarious P. McFizzle wrote:Also, where did /b/ come from? (Other than 40-year-old porn addicts, we knew that.)
Aha! A long-standing mystery about PIE is solved! It was in front of us all the time - they didn't have 4chan back then!
Daquarious P. McFizzle wrote:My (very poor) understanding of Ancient Greek plosives (disregarding the various flavors of velar, they're not important for this) is:

PIE /p t k/>/p t k/
PIE /b d g/ >/b d g/
PIE /bh dh gh/ >/ph th kh/

but PIE was exceptionally rare in /b/, while it's quite common in Ancient Greek.
Well, /gw/ often became /b/, typically before /a/ and /o/.
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.

User avatar
Morrígan
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Wizard Tower

Post by Morrígan »

bricka wrote:Well, /gw/ often became /b/, typically before /a/ and /o/.
Exactly. I don't think Greek did anything with /dw/ or /tw/ – since the /w/ was deleted – though IIRC these did become labial in Latin.

User avatar
Zhen Lin
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:59 am

Re: Ancient Greek phonology / diachronics

Post by Zhen Lin »

bricka wrote:
Zhen Lin wrote:1. It is mentioned that Attic/Ionic raised /a a:/ to /e E:/ - under what conditions?
Everywhere except after /e i r/.
That's what's said for /a:/, but it doesn't seem to be true for short /a/. For instance, why is it Artemis (cf Doric Artamis) and not **Ertemis? Why do we have catalysis and not **cetelysis?

(On another note, I looked up the same change in French, and apparently there it happens in stressed open syllables. But it's Ártemis, not **Artémis, so it's probably not the exact same change, unless some analogical reform was involved.)
書不盡言、言不盡意

User avatar
Morrígan
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 396
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:33 am
Location: Wizard Tower

Re: Ancient Greek phonology / diachronics

Post by Morrígan »

Zhen Lin wrote:
bricka wrote:
Zhen Lin wrote:1. It is mentioned that Attic/Ionic raised /a a:/ to /e E:/ - under what conditions?
Everywhere except after /e i r/.
That's what's said for /a:/, but it doesn't seem to be true for short /a/. For instance, why is it Artemis (cf Doric Artamis) and not **Ertemis? Why do we have catalysis and not **cetelysis?

(On another note, I looked up the same change in French, and apparently there it happens in stressed open syllables. But it's Ártemis, not **Artémis, so it's probably not the exact same change, unless some analogical reform was involved.)
Actually, I thought that change happened only to /aː/ and not to /a/, though I might be wrong.

User avatar
alice
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 4:43 pm
Location: Three of them

Re: Ancient Greek phonology / diachronics

Post by alice »

TheGoatMan wrote:
Zhen Lin wrote:
bricka wrote:
Zhen Lin wrote:1. It is mentioned that Attic/Ionic raised /a a:/ to /e E:/ - under what conditions?
Everywhere except after /e i r/.
That's what's said for /a:/, but it doesn't seem to be true for short /a/. For instance, why is it Artemis (cf Doric Artamis) and not **Ertemis? Why do we have catalysis and not **cetelysis?

(On another note, I looked up the same change in French, and apparently there it happens in stressed open syllables. But it's Ártemis, not **Artémis, so it's probably not the exact same change, unless some analogical reform was involved.)
Actually, I thought that change happened only to /aː/ and not to /a/, though I might be wrong.
You're quite right; I don't know about short /a/.
Zompist's Markov generator wrote:it was labelled" orange marmalade," but that is unutterably hideous.

User avatar
Zhen Lin
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 9:59 am

Post by Zhen Lin »

Perhaps it's sporadic. The only other example I've seen is hieros < PIE *ish₂ros. (I see the aspiration also jumped there...)
書不盡言、言不盡意

User avatar
Sleinad Flar
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 124
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 11:18 pm
Location: Coriovallum, Germania Inferior

Post by Sleinad Flar »

Zhen Lin wrote:Perhaps it's sporadic. The only other example I've seen is hieros < PIE *ish₂ros. (I see the aspiration also jumped there...)
That should be *ish1ros (according to Mallory/Adams). The aspiration is irregular.

Post Reply