"Silent treatment" kills a language

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
Post Reply
Jashan
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 136
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 6:26 am
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

"Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by Jashan »

There are only two fluent speakers of the Ayapaneco language in Mexico who are still alive. However, language conservation efforts are hitting a massive -- and unusual -- roadblock: Manuel Segovia (75) and Isidro Velazquezto (69) refuse to talk to each other.

Article here
[quote="Xephyr"]Kitties: little happy factories.[/quote]

User avatar
roninbodhisattva
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 568
Joined: Sun Mar 05, 2006 11:50 pm
Location: California

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by roninbodhisattva »

Oh good lord.

User avatar
masako
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1731
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 4:31 pm
Location: 가매
Contact:

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by masako »

You beat me to it...

I heard about this on my way into work this morning.

User avatar
Legion
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 522
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 9:56 pm

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by Legion »

Wait why is this news? This story has been around for years.

Edit: also, if there are only two speakers left of a language, it is already technically dead, whether they talk to each other or not.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by finlay »

Legion wrote:Wait why is this news? This story has been around for years.

Edit: also, if there are only two speakers left of a language, it is already technically dead, whether they talk to each other or not.
A language is dead once it's not being passed on to children anymore, though, so technically you could have a language with 2 speakers that isn't quite moribund because it's about to passed on to a couple's children or something. Of course, the rule kind of only applies to small numbers that are greater than that because i can't really think of a situation where it would apply and i'm just being facetious.... :P

zompist
Boardlord
Boardlord
Posts: 3368
Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2002 8:26 pm
Location: In the den
Contact:

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by zompist »

A bit more accurately, if there's just two elderly speakers, the language is moribund. Lakoff gives interesting details about Dyirbal in Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things; the main point is that linguistic details start getting lost well before the language disappears. Those old dudes probably speak a rather debased form of Ayapaneco.

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by Xephyr »

Daniel Suslak, an Indiana University linguistic anthropologist, is compiling a dictionary to record the existence of the language.
Anyone else get a kick out of the wording here? Yeah, I think we've already pretty well established the language's EXISTENCE... what Daniel Suslak (and other field linguists) are doing is something else.

Unless...

"After three years of living with the Ayapaneco and learning and meticulously documenting their language, I have at last sufficiently demonstrated, in my estimation, that the Ayapaneco language does, in fact, exist." -- Daniel Suslak's PhD thesis
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by Salmoneus »

Better thesis:
"After thirteen years of living with the Ayapaneco and learning and meticulously documenting their language, I have at last sufficiently demonstrated, in my estimation, that the Ayapaneco language DID, in fact, exist." -- Daniel Suslak's PhD
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

User avatar
WechtleinUns
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 59
Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:45 pm

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by WechtleinUns »

Don't worry. Make a conlang about it.

sirred
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 9:37 am

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by sirred »

Couldn't they just bite the bullet and just write down all the different ways to say, "I'm not talking to that son of a bitch."?
In every U.S. presidential election between 1976 and 2004, the Republican nominee for president or for vice president was either a Dole or a Bush.

User avatar
Skittles
Niš
Niš
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2011 1:03 am
Location: Californian Desert

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by Skittles »

It would be so cool if they did that!! :D
the candle waxed and waned
as the pen soared and sunk ;
thusly I clambered to the moon
and drew the ladder after me .....
Currently Reading: nothing however I am studying german with rosetta stone

User avatar
The Count
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:08 pm
Location: Gränsfors, Sweden
Contact:

Re: "Silent treatment" kills a language

Post by The Count »

Greed knows no boundaries! Why don't they just pay those old farts and I'll bet they talk? Pay them even more and chances are they even make babies.
"Khal malenol akher venkhasa!"

Post Reply