Ok what the hell is this

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Ok what the hell is this

Post by Drydic »

So I can't for the fucking life of me figure out what form this is supposed to be I be responsible and mow my lawn, and I miss everyone :(

I produced it, it's right for me, the somewhat comparable I was responsible and mowed my lawn, and I miss everyone :( does NOT mean the same thing. But no clue what form it is (and if someone says 'it's the infinitive durr' I WILL STALK YOU DEAD).

HALPZ
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Travis B. »

It's subjunctive, specifically what's commonly called "present subjunctive" (even though I don't think that's the proper name for it).
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
Aurora Rossa
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1138
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:46 am
Location: The vendée of America
Contact:

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Aurora Rossa »

Are you asking about more grammatical or pragmatically suitable alternatives to "be" as the verb there? I would probably say "I am responsible and mow my lawn" or something along those lines.
Image
"There was a particular car I soon came to think of as distinctly St. Louis-ish: a gigantic white S.U.V. with a W. bumper sticker on it for George W. Bush."

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Drydic »

Jabechasqvi wrote:Are you asking about more grammatical or pragmatically suitable alternatives to "be" as the verb there? I would probably say "I am responsible and mow my lawn" or something along those lines.
Drydic Guy wrote:I be responsible and mow my lawn, and I miss everyone :(
Drydic Guy wrote:I produced it, it's right for me
hth
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Bob Johnson »

Looks like subjunctive, but what's it joined under?

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Drydic »

...joined under?

for the record, the entire original utterance was

<Drydic> fff
<Drydic> I be responsible and mow my lawn, and I miss everyone :(
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Bob Johnson »

Well the subjunctive is normally encountered in the form "It's important that I be elected" and "If I were king"; here it doesn't look like a subordinate clause, so maybe it's not really the same thing.

User avatar
Drydic
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1652
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2002 12:23 pm
Location: I am a prisoner in my own mind.
Contact:

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Drydic »

Ah, subclauses and all, gotcha (though the usage joined under is still a little mysterious).
Image Image
Common Zein Scratchpad & other Stuffs! OMG AN ACTUAL CONPOST WTFBBQ

Formerly known as Drydic.

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Travis B. »

The subjunctive does not need to be in a subordinate clause. It just happens that in more modern usage, subordinate clauses happen to be really its last holdouts. In more archaic usage, it was not unusual to find the subjunctive in a main clause, as it is found here.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
Ser
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1542
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:55 am
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia / Colombie Britannique, Canada

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Ser »

It's common in AAVE (sub)dialects to use the verb "to be" like that. I be, you be. Yes, main clauses. Maybe you've been influenced by that, Drydic guy?

Also, why did you compare it with was? Does "I be" have past tense for you here?

Maulrus
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:28 am

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Maulrus »

This might be obvious to other people but I'm trying to figure out what you meant with it. At first it seemed totally wrong as far as anything I'd ever say, but then I realized I can imagine at least one context in which I'd say that verbatim. In the second sentence, do you mean "miss" as in "not see" rather than "long for"? (Only asking because it made no sense to me with the latter meaning.) If so, while I don't know what this is grammatically speaking, it's something I do. It's almost like a response to an imperative. If someone said to me "Be responsible and do the right thing", I can imagine saying "I be responsible and do the right thing, but I still get screwed over", stress on the "be". I guess I would use that construction when the first half of the sentence (e.g. the imperative bit) led to the second half, which is generally an undesirable result.

Hopefully that makes sense to somebody?

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Nortaneous »

i [go] be responsible and mow my lawn, and...
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Bob Johnson
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:41 am
Location: NY, USA

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Bob Johnson »

Drydic Guy wrote:(though the usage joined under is still a little mysterious).
calque of sub- junct
Sinjana wrote:It's common in AAVE (sub)dialects to use the verb "to be" like that. I be, you be. Yes, main clauses. Maybe you've been influenced by that, Drydic guy?
That's habitual, the other obvious candidate here.

Maybe it's just a short form of "I go and be" ? Edit: hi Nort

Maulrus
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:28 am

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Maulrus »

Nortaneous wrote:i [go] be responsible and mow my lawn, and...
ahhh, that would explain it.

User avatar
installer_swan
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 64
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 10:47 am
Location: Hic
Contact:

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by installer_swan »

Travis B. wrote:The subjunctive does not need to be in a subordinate clause. It just happens that in more modern usage, subordinate clauses happen to be really its last holdouts. In more archaic usage, it was not unusual to find the subjunctive in a main clause, as it is found here.
Perhaps, but I often wonder if "I am"/"I be" distinction is beginning to develop the sort of "ser/estar" dichotomy of Spanish. Consider "I be responsible" vs "I am/was [always] responsible".
..- ... ..- --.- .. .-. --- -..-

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by finlay »

I think it's kind of active instead of stative, or something, since I think it's sort of fine for me but "I go and be responsible" would mean something slightly different. Kinda difficult to explain it, though. I'm sure I've asked about this in the context of people who be something in a play. ("Every night, I be Caesar for forty minutes, and then he, uh ... bes ... Caesar for the next forty minutes")

User avatar
Ser
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1542
Joined: Sat Jul 19, 2008 1:55 am
Location: Vancouver, British Columbia / Colombie Britannique, Canada

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Ser »

...Frankly, I don't think I've ever heard this usage of "I be" here in Vancouver — that's why it strikes me as AAVE-like. Still, surprising you're perfectly familiar with it even though you're from Scotland.

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by finlay »

Also, what about trying "I go and be responsible" in the past tense? I'm wanting to say "I went and be'd reponsible".

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Nortaneous »

finlay wrote:Also, what about trying "I go and be responsible" in the past tense? I'm wanting to say "I went and be'd reponsible".
sounds not completely ungrammatical to me
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Maulrus
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 5:28 am

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Maulrus »

finlay wrote:Also, what about trying "I go and be responsible" in the past tense? I'm wanting to say "I went and be'd reponsible".
I'd probably try to get around that by saying something along the lines of "I had to go and be responsible".

Astraios
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2974
Joined: Fri Mar 05, 2010 2:38 am
Location: Israel

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Astraios »

It's perfectly normal for me. I be responsible, I be'd responsible, he be's responsible... It's not a subjunctive at all, it's something like habitual.

User avatar
Xephyr
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 821
Joined: Sat May 03, 2003 3:04 pm

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Xephyr »

travis wrote:The subjunctive does not need to be in a subordinate clause. It just happens that in more modern usage, subordinate clauses happen to be really its last holdouts. In more archaic usage, it was not unusual to find the subjunctive in a main clause, as it is found here.
I think you are totally wrong here: it's not subjunctive. It doesn't look like a subjunctive clause semantically or syntactically-- just because the form is "be" doesn't mean it's therefore a subjunctive. And no, subjunctives don't have to be in subordinate clauess, but what Drydic said was not archaic usage: the meaning expressed in "I be good and..." is entirely different from "the king's life be long and prosperous". And saying that it's some sort of ellipsis of a complement clause is the same mistake uninformed grammar teachers make when they try to correct "he sings better than me" to "he sings better than I", citing "he sings more than I do".

My money on what this is is what I think is called "regularized be", similar to what Finlay is saying. It implies a more deliberate action, with agency on the part of the subject instead of just identity.
"It will not come by waiting for it. It will not be said, 'Here it is,' or 'There it is.' Rather, the Kingdom of the Father is spread out upon the earth, and men do not see it."
The Gospel of Thomas

Davoush
Sanci
Sanci
Posts: 67
Joined: Fri Sep 29, 2006 1:05 pm
Location: Liverpool, UK

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Davoush »

I don't think it's a subjunctive, I think it's used when 'be' has a meaning more similar to 'behave' (in other words more active than stative) so like the ser/estar distinction in Spanish. I use it quite a lot I've noticed "He bes annoying", "I be responsible", etc.

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by Salmoneus »

I wouldn't totally rule out a subjunctive that's just missing the 'if', particularly since it works so well in the future: "(If) I be responsible, I'll miss my friends". The 'if' there can be dropped, so it wouldn't surprise me if you analogised from "I be responsible I'll miss my friends" to "I be responsible I miss my friends".

However, I think the repurposing of 'be' as a more emphatic and active essive/equative verb is probably more likely. It isn't grammaticalised fully yet (hence its being so defective, and puzzling), but it's a usage seen creeping in in many place. For instance, it's marked through stress in some cases: "Please be a nun" (totally unstressed 'be', apostophic rhetorical request when you hear a knock on your door), vs "please be a nun" (slightly more stressed 'be', request for somebody to pretend to be a nun, or, if they ARE a nun, to act fully in their nun-role for a moment). Note that the increased stress is too light to be normal sentence-level emphasis (versus "I can't, I'm a nun" - "well then BE a nun!"), it's just the removal of the exceptional non-stress that is found on particles, copulas, and generally 'structural' elements, and thus shows that 'be' is being used as an actual verb. Albeit one with no past tense, and only a marginal non-imperative form. [Mostly only occuring in the continuous, "I was being a nun" vs "I was a nun"]
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Ok what the hell is this

Post by finlay »

Actually come to think of it, Sal might be right; the OP looks like it might be a kind of subjunctive minus the if, since it's connecting an action with an outcome (I was struggling to give it a valid context earlier, which led to me not fully understanding it). But I dunno. It's all a bit confusing what applies here.

Post Reply