categorizing vowels

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
User avatar
Melteor
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 229
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 3:26 pm

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Melteor »

I have heard that as is to [j], so too is [e] to the approximant in 'yacht'.

User avatar
Pinetree
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 204
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:55 pm

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Pinetree »

Nortaneous wrote:in an attempt to save this thread from nigh-unprecedented levels of pointless dumbfuckery, here is an animated gif of a hair metal guy flying on a crocodile

Image
Ace. Fucking. Rimmer. You win.

Grimalkin
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: UK

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Grimalkin »

Granpa, tell me this.

How would you represent nasal vowels?

User avatar
granpa
Niš
Niš
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Apr 06, 2008 3:53 pm

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by granpa »

thats an interesting question.

I guess m, n, ng are nasal approximates so presumably you could have diphthongs that are combinations of vowel + nasal approximate

The trouble is that I dont know how to pronounce nasal vowels

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by ol bofosh »

Nortaneous wrote:in an attempt to save this thread from nigh-unprecedented levels of pointless dumbfuckery, here is an animated gif of a hair metal guy flying on a crocodile

Image
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.

Smegtastic.
It was about time I changed this.

cromulant
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 402
Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2006 10:12 pm

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by cromulant »

i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length

length would be uvular

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Thry »

cromulant wrote:i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length

length would be uvular
Don't go offtopic. How would the crocodile fit this paradigm?

User avatar
Lyra
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:47 pm
Location: CATALUNYA INDEPENDÈNCIA TERRA LLIURE

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Lyra »

cromulant wrote:i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length

length would be uvular
I think it would vary in sonority depending on the dialect. Especially in the velar diphthongs.

Central vowels would be voiceless.

~Lyra
"In the liver we trust."
Image
From yonder, in the land of TWC.

Grimalkin
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: UK

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Grimalkin »

I would like to present a better system:


When there is a pair of vowels, the member on the left is sliding. The one on the right is flat. I think this is a neat way of classifying tones in languages that have them.

Image

I'm not sure about the placement of the rhotic vowels, and I think the system as a whole is too derivative of the IPA chart.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Thry »

But the French row should be homorganic, shouldn't it?

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Nortaneous »

And what about the omlauts? Shouldn't there be a third row for them?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

Grimalkin
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 10:24 pm
Location: UK

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Grimalkin »

No because omlauts are a result of i-mutation, which in simple terms, is saturation of progressive spread short vowels. Any basic textbook on Germanic linguistics will tell you this. Sure, further sound changes in some languages produced front rounded vowels (better, ''faucalized'' vowels) but this was due to strong dialectal admixture with a Gallo-Romance substratum.
Eandil wrote:But the French row should be homorganic, shouldn't it?
Undecided on this. Let's just say that French doesn't fit neatly into my system so I say just ignore the evidence and keep things as they are.

User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Pole, the »

Eandil wrote:
cromulant wrote:i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length

length would be uvular
Don't go offtopic. How would the crocodile fit this paradigm?
Crocodile is [+long], that's all I know.
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

User avatar
Salmoneus
Sanno
Sanno
Posts: 3197
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
Location: One of the dark places of the world

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Salmoneus »

Hubris Incalculable wrote:
Nortaneous wrote:in an attempt to save this thread from nigh-unprecedented levels of pointless dumbfuckery, here is an animated gif of a hair metal guy flying on a crocodile

Image
Ace. Fucking. Rimmer. You win.
Sorry, no, what you should have said was "Das war Ace Rimmer!"
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]

But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!

Travis B.
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3570
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 12:47 pm
Location: Milwaukee, US

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Travis B. »

None. of. this. makes. any. sense. whatsoever.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Vuvuzela »

sedrfhyujkl[;]'\
][pl-oi98u7ytrde5r6t7g8yu9i0k-opl];\]
lpo]i0juy8gres523w4sdfrt86yhjikoimjytfeswaqsdthil;pokuygfr4swz vy ycfyyljbh xtymokjjfed2435989j ubtd4e67gvgxes4dyhiom bgcdrfhimomjubyftyimlj bhyunknuvyguinnonhvfycxdrszewwzrctunimiubtcewzqzswcf hubt crxwzwzwzw0ipbgutydyrybytcdezwzqzsxrfxszxsxaacccdcddccdddhuuuuuhuhuhubgvgtvtvtyvytvtyv
Travis B. wrote:None. of. this. makes. any. sense. whatsoever.
I guess you're right

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by ol bofosh »

Vuvuzela wrote:sedrfhyujkl[;]'\
Faskinating! I should do something like that for Alahithian, it would make it so much more complete. Not the rest though, that would be too much.
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
Tropylium
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 512
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: Halfway to Hyperborea

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Tropylium »

It strikes me as you have not noticed the wealth of information available from considering the trajectory lengths within the orthographic roundedness quotient space, which clearly dictates a split into uppercase and lowercase vowels chronologically anterior to the development of exolabialization and contrastive dorsalization (but, most probably not allophonic dorsalization related to the acquisition of fricates, seeing how their common acoustic features originate in microscale eddies, and this would thus contradict the received timeline on the development of locally socialistic power structures), a division that is instinctively clear for most, as anyone familiar with TIPA notation can verify.

Please consult the latest issue of the Annals of the Northern Pomeranian Philological Society for further details.
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Vuvuzela »

ol bofosh wrote:
Vuvuzela wrote:sedrfhyujkl[;]'\
Faskinating! I should do something like that for Alahithian, it would make it so much more complete. Not the rest though, that would be too much.
But you don't understand, before you can sedrfhyujkl[;]'\, you HAVE to crxwzwzwzw0ipbgutydyrybytcdezwzqzsxrfxszxsxaacccdcddccdddhuuuuuhuhuhubgvgtvtvtyvytvtyv. Otherwise, we'd just be eating each other's grandmothers.

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by ol bofosh »

Vuvuzela wrote:But you don't understand, before you can sedrfhyujkl[;]'\, you HAVE to crxwzwzwzw0ipbgutydyrybytcdezwzqzsxrfxszxsxaacccdcddccdddhuuuuuhuhuhubgvgtvtvtyvytvtyv. Otherwise, we'd just be eating each other's grandmothers.
I can understand crxwzwzwzw but I can't get past 0ipbgut, it doesn't fit the dsagiutrkjgkhççç that I already have.
So when's your grandmother coming over for dinner?
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
Lyra
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:47 pm
Location: CATALUNYA INDEPENDÈNCIA TERRA LLIURE

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Lyra »

I think the trilateral emphatization of some further back high vowels should be represented as a different entity to the voiceless dento-uvular rothic diphthongs.

The 'fudge-moron' ligature should also be represented there.

~Lyra
"In the liver we trust."
Image
From yonder, in the land of TWC.

User avatar
Whimemsz
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 690
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Gimaamaa onibaaganing

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Whimemsz »

christ, we get it, his posts make no sense

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by ol bofosh »

Random Thread II anyone?
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
Pole, the
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1606
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:50 am

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Pole, the »

ol bofosh wrote:Random Thread II anyone?
All the bboard is one huge Random Thread.
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.

If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: categorizing vowels

Post by Thry »

Whimemsz wrote:christ, we get it, his posts make no sense
We also get you can't stand any slight mockery of anything in the board

Also the ZBB will never be a holy shrine, get over it. This is no place to show off sanctimonious stoicity.
So come on in and participate in these vanguardistic phonemic charts.

Post Reply