categorizing vowels
Re: categorizing vowels
I have heard that as is to [j], so too is [e] to the approximant in 'yacht'.
Re: categorizing vowels
Ace. Fucking. Rimmer. You win.Nortaneous wrote:in an attempt to save this thread from nigh-unprecedented levels of pointless dumbfuckery, here is an animated gif of a hair metal guy flying on a crocodile
Re: categorizing vowels
Granpa, tell me this.
How would you represent nasal vowels?
How would you represent nasal vowels?
Re: categorizing vowels
thats an interesting question.
I guess m, n, ng are nasal approximates so presumably you could have diphthongs that are combinations of vowel + nasal approximate
The trouble is that I dont know how to pronounce nasal vowels
I guess m, n, ng are nasal approximates so presumably you could have diphthongs that are combinations of vowel + nasal approximate
The trouble is that I dont know how to pronounce nasal vowels
- ol bofosh
- Smeric

- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
- Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp
Re: categorizing vowels
Smoke me a kipper, I'll be back for breakfast.Nortaneous wrote:in an attempt to save this thread from nigh-unprecedented levels of pointless dumbfuckery, here is an animated gif of a hair metal guy flying on a crocodile
Smegtastic.
It was about time I changed this.
Re: categorizing vowels
i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length
length would be uvular
length would be uvular
Re: categorizing vowels
Don't go offtopic. How would the crocodile fit this paradigm?cromulant wrote:i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length
length would be uvular
- Lyra
- Lebom

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:47 pm
- Location: CATALUNYA INDEPENDÈNCIA TERRA LLIURE
Re: categorizing vowels
I think it would vary in sonority depending on the dialect. Especially in the velar diphthongs.cromulant wrote:i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length
length would be uvular
Central vowels would be voiceless.
~Lyra
"In the liver we trust."

From yonder, in the land of TWC.

From yonder, in the land of TWC.
Re: categorizing vowels
I would like to present a better system:
When there is a pair of vowels, the member on the left is sliding. The one on the right is flat. I think this is a neat way of classifying tones in languages that have them.

I'm not sure about the placement of the rhotic vowels, and I think the system as a whole is too derivative of the IPA chart.
When there is a pair of vowels, the member on the left is sliding. The one on the right is flat. I think this is a neat way of classifying tones in languages that have them.

I'm not sure about the placement of the rhotic vowels, and I think the system as a whole is too derivative of the IPA chart.
Re: categorizing vowels
But the French row should be homorganic, shouldn't it?
- Nortaneous
- Sumerul

- Posts: 4544
- Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
- Location: the Imperial Corridor
Re: categorizing vowels
And what about the omlauts? Shouldn't there be a third row for them?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.
Re: categorizing vowels
No because omlauts are a result of i-mutation, which in simple terms, is saturation of progressive spread short vowels. Any basic textbook on Germanic linguistics will tell you this. Sure, further sound changes in some languages produced front rounded vowels (better, ''faucalized'' vowels) but this was due to strong dialectal admixture with a Gallo-Romance substratum.
Undecided on this. Let's just say that French doesn't fit neatly into my system so I say just ignore the evidence and keep things as they are.Eandil wrote:But the French row should be homorganic, shouldn't it?
Re: categorizing vowels
Crocodile is [+long], that's all I know.Eandil wrote:Don't go offtopic. How would the crocodile fit this paradigm?cromulant wrote:i think nasal vowles would be basically the same as plosive vowels excpet for length
length would be uvular
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
- Salmoneus
- Sanno

- Posts: 3197
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: One of the dark places of the world
Re: categorizing vowels
Sorry, no, what you should have said was "Das war Ace Rimmer!"Hubris Incalculable wrote:Ace. Fucking. Rimmer. You win.Nortaneous wrote:in an attempt to save this thread from nigh-unprecedented levels of pointless dumbfuckery, here is an animated gif of a hair metal guy flying on a crocodile
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
Re: categorizing vowels
None. of. this. makes. any. sense. whatsoever.
Dibotahamdn duthma jallni agaynni ra hgitn lakrhmi.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Amuhawr jalla vowa vta hlakrhi hdm duthmi xaja.
Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro. Irdro.
Re: categorizing vowels
sedrfhyujkl[;]'\
][pl-oi98u7ytrde5r6t7g8yu9i0k-opl];\]
lpo]i0juy8gres523w4sdfrt86yhjikoimjytfeswaqsdthil;pokuygfr4swz vy ycfyyljbh xtymokjjfed2435989j ubtd4e67gvgxes4dyhiom bgcdrfhimomjubyftyimlj bhyunknuvyguinnonhvfycxdrszewwzrctunimiubtcewzqzswcf hubt crxwzwzwzw0ipbgutydyrybytcdezwzqzsxrfxszxsxaacccdcddccdddhuuuuuhuhuhubgvgtvtvtyvytvtyv
][pl-oi98u7ytrde5r6t7g8yu9i0k-opl];\]
lpo]i0juy8gres523w4sdfrt86yhjikoimjytfeswaqsdthil;pokuygfr4swz vy ycfyyljbh xtymokjjfed2435989j ubtd4e67gvgxes4dyhiom bgcdrfhimomjubyftyimlj bhyunknuvyguinnonhvfycxdrszewwzrctunimiubtcewzqzswcf hubt crxwzwzwzw0ipbgutydyrybytcdezwzqzsxrfxszxsxaacccdcddccdddhuuuuuhuhuhubgvgtvtvtyvytvtyv
I guess you're rightTravis B. wrote:None. of. this. makes. any. sense. whatsoever.
- ol bofosh
- Smeric

- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
- Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp
Re: categorizing vowels
Faskinating! I should do something like that for Alahithian, it would make it so much more complete. Not the rest though, that would be too much.Vuvuzela wrote:sedrfhyujkl[;]'\
It was about time I changed this.
Re: categorizing vowels
It strikes me as you have not noticed the wealth of information available from considering the trajectory lengths within the orthographic roundedness quotient space, which clearly dictates a split into uppercase and lowercase vowels chronologically anterior to the development of exolabialization and contrastive dorsalization (but, most probably not allophonic dorsalization related to the acquisition of fricates, seeing how their common acoustic features originate in microscale eddies, and this would thus contradict the received timeline on the development of locally socialistic power structures), a division that is instinctively clear for most, as anyone familiar with TIPA notation can verify.
Please consult the latest issue of the Annals of the Northern Pomeranian Philological Society for further details.
Please consult the latest issue of the Annals of the Northern Pomeranian Philological Society for further details.
[ˌʔaɪsəˈpʰɻ̊ʷoʊpɪɫ ˈʔæɫkəɦɔɫ]
Re: categorizing vowels
But you don't understand, before you can sedrfhyujkl[;]'\, you HAVE to crxwzwzwzw0ipbgutydyrybytcdezwzqzsxrfxszxsxaacccdcddccdddhuuuuuhuhuhubgvgtvtvtyvytvtyv. Otherwise, we'd just be eating each other's grandmothers.ol bofosh wrote:Faskinating! I should do something like that for Alahithian, it would make it so much more complete. Not the rest though, that would be too much.Vuvuzela wrote:sedrfhyujkl[;]'\
- ol bofosh
- Smeric

- Posts: 1169
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
- Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp
Re: categorizing vowels
I can understand crxwzwzwzw but I can't get past 0ipbgut, it doesn't fit the dsagiutrkjgkhççç that I already have.Vuvuzela wrote:But you don't understand, before you can sedrfhyujkl[;]'\, you HAVE to crxwzwzwzw0ipbgutydyrybytcdezwzqzsxrfxszxsxaacccdcddccdddhuuuuuhuhuhubgvgtvtvtyvytvtyv. Otherwise, we'd just be eating each other's grandmothers.
So when's your grandmother coming over for dinner?
It was about time I changed this.
- Lyra
- Lebom

- Posts: 229
- Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 1:47 pm
- Location: CATALUNYA INDEPENDÈNCIA TERRA LLIURE
Re: categorizing vowels
I think the trilateral emphatization of some further back high vowels should be represented as a different entity to the voiceless dento-uvular rothic diphthongs.
The 'fudge-moron' ligature should also be represented there.
~Lyra
The 'fudge-moron' ligature should also be represented there.
~Lyra
"In the liver we trust."

From yonder, in the land of TWC.

From yonder, in the land of TWC.
Re: categorizing vowels
christ, we get it, his posts make no sense
Re: categorizing vowels
All the bboard is one huge Random Thread.ol bofosh wrote:Random Thread II anyone?
The conlanger formerly known as “the conlanger formerly known as Pole, the”.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
If we don't study the mistakes of the future we're doomed to repeat them for the first time.
Re: categorizing vowels
We also get you can't stand any slight mockery of anything in the boardWhimemsz wrote:christ, we get it, his posts make no sense
Also the ZBB will never be a holy shrine, get over it. This is no place to show off sanctimonious stoicity.
So come on in and participate in these vanguardistic phonemic charts.


