Phonological features* you dislike...

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
theweevil
Niš
Niš
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:09 am
Location: The Moon

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by theweevil »

1.I don't hate pharyngeals and Epiglottals, but when a language contrasts them.....it kinda makes me wanna /ʕħħʕʕʕħħʜʜʜ/
2. I don't particularly care for the Bostonian, New York, (New)Jersey accents
3. /ɻ/ i still have some issues producing...so that's really the only reason I currently dislike it
4. Clicks I wouldn't say I hate, but I can't really produce them yet
5. Stød was created by Satan himself. I mean seriously, Mon Dieu!
6. I only recently have some what of a grip on producing the ungodly "r" that Japanese has
7. Geminate consonants, but mostly vowel length distinctions make my hair combust
8. /ɨ/ pisses me off, along with all the other central vowels, i'm watching you,/ɐ/!
9. Slavic and Georgian consonant clusters, which I adore, also tie my tongue into knots boy scouts have never heard of
10. I love French, except for a slight disdain for when /œ/ is nasalized. Beurk!
11. Tonal languages = i just can't even, I don't hate them, they sound beautiful, but I just càn't dô ít
12. Whenever I see some recreation/dramatization/illustration of a historical event the actors always have so variety of a british accent, regardless of the the country/language of the people portrayed. <<<<Things like this keep me awake at night ( also Number 7)
13. Languages that have gramatical politeness
14. Infixes make my he|ache|ad
15. That's all for the time being.....
English= L1
Français= I could have a choppy conversation with....maybe a third grader
日本語,русский язык,Język Polski,Gaeilge,Cymraeg,官話= I can count and say some stuff

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Izambri »

I don't like catanyol:
  • ● Devoicing of voiced sibilants.
    ● Opening of [ə]/[ɐ] into [a].
    ● Substituion of [ɛ] and [ɔ] by [e] and [o], respectively.
    ● Affrication of palatal fricatives at the beginning of a word or after consonant.
    ● Velarization of [ɫ] is lost, becoming [l].
    ● Neutralization of [ʎ], becoming [j].
    ● Neutralization of all nasals (/m/, /n/, /ɲ/ i /ŋ/) in syllabic coda, being reduced to [n], or even [ŋ].
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by ol bofosh »

● Devoicing of voiced sibilants.
Ai jaf tu jaf a baiking jat.
A cycling helmet?
No a baiking jat dat de nors baikings jad.


/v/ as [β] doesn't sound nice. [v] can't be that hard. Nor [z] for that matter.

And why does [wu] jaf to become [ɣu]?

/h/ as [x] is a bit annoying, but I can forgive it since even I find most sounds behind a velar ([h] and [ʔ] excluded) a bit difficult.

Oh, and it's cute to say estop as a borrowed word, but why carry it into English? Is so estupid.

:mrgreen:

Bat, jey, ai laik de spanis acsent, rili ai du. :)
● Neutralization of [ʎ], becoming [j].
Yeah, sorry about that. :wink:
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
L'alphabētarium
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:30 pm

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by L'alphabētarium »

Izambri wrote:I don't like catanyol:
  • ● Devoicing of voiced sibilants.
    ● Opening of [ə]/[ɐ] into [a].
    ● Substituion of [ɛ] and [ɔ] by [e] and [o], respectively.
    ● Affrication of palatal fricatives at the beginning of a word or after consonant.
    ● Velarization of [ɫ] is lost, becoming [l].
    ● Neutralization of [ʎ], becoming [j].
    ● Neutralization of all nasals (/m/, /n/, /ɲ/ i /ŋ/) in syllabic coda, being reduced to [n], or even [ŋ].
Someone likes his Catalan Catalonian...
Adjective Recoil wrote:Additionally, tonal languages suck for singing.
I agree. It's like the singers sing in their own notes and melodies distinct from the ones the instruments are playing.
Torco wrote:I can barely tell apart e and E now, and that's a fucking achievement for me xD
I have this problem as well. I can pronounce them easily, but I have trouble telling them apart, especially when listening to Portuguese, Catalan or Italian, though it's easier when I listen to most French speakers cause their [e] is usually a bit higher and closer to than to [ɛ].

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Vuvuzela »

I don't like ↗ languages, especially ↗dialects of ↗English with rising intonation at the ends of ↗statements. (Like some younger female speakers from southern California or, more egregiously, imitations thereof.)

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by ol bofosh »

Vuvuzela wrote:I don't like ↗ languages, especially ↗dialects of ↗English with rising intonation at the ends of ↗statements. (Like some younger female speakers from southern California or, more egregiously, imitations thereof.)
¡Estop ¡meik it estop! :o
It was about time I changed this.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Thry »

Izambri wrote:I don't like catanyol:
  • ● Devoicing of voiced sibilants.
    ● Opening of [ə]/[ɐ] into [a].
    ● Substituion of [ɛ] and [ɔ] by [e] and [o], respectively.
    ● Affrication of palatal fricatives at the beginning of a word or after consonant.
    ● Velarization of [ɫ] is lost, becoming [l].
    ● Neutralization of [ʎ], becoming [j].
    ● Neutralization of all nasals (/m/, /n/, /ɲ/ i /ŋ/) in syllabic coda, being reduced to [n], or even [ŋ].
No en diguis achó tíoooo.

So Valencian should please you a bit less than Barceloní, with such clear vowels. - Especially apitxat

But, talking objectively here:

● Velarization of [ɫ] is lost, becoming [l].

That never sounds worse. Pujooolllllll

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Izambri »

Ean wrote:So Valencian should please you a bit less than Barceloní, with such clear vowels. - Especially apitxat
No, Valencian doesn't please me less than other Catalan dialects. If it's well spoken, of course, because there's also castencià.
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Thry »

You're un prescriptivista de cuidao then.

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Izambri »

Ean wrote:You're un prescriptivista de cuidao then.
No, it's not about being a linguistic prescriptivist/purist; it's about disliking bad spoken languages/dialects/speeches because of a) diglossia, and/or b) on purpose ignorance.
I don't count c) hatred for a language, because those directly don't speak it.
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Thry »

lol c) would be funny, "I HATE THIS LANGUAGE AND IM GONNA SPEAK IT THE WRUNG WAY."

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Izambri »

Ean wrote:lol c) would be funny, "I HATE THIS LANGUAGE AND IM GONNA SPEAK IT THE WRUNG WAY."
We could consider that a kind of boycott then, no? XDXDXD
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

Thry
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 2085
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 12:15 pm
Location: Spain

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Thry »

Yea, destroying it from the inside (lets biguín güid inglis!).

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by ol bofosh »

Ean wrote:Yea, destroying it from the inside(lets biguín güid inglis!).
Too late, the Americans got there before you (goes hide behind somewhere safe...ish). *whistling innocently*
Oh, and the chavs, let's not forget the chavs.

And there's no academy to "clean" it.
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Izambri »

ol bofosh wrote:Oh, and the chavs, let's not forget the chavs.

And there's no academy to "clean" it.
Chavs like the guys from Geordie Shore? Curious English they have. XD
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by ol bofosh »

Izambri wrote:
ol bofosh wrote:Oh, and the chavs, let's not forget the chavs.

And there's no academy to "clean" it.
Chavs like the guys from Geordie Shore? Curious English they have. XD
God, that program, horrible.

Geordie dialect has proud and ancient roots. There are chavs there, but "howay man" can be considered quite normal.

Chavs: Vicky Pollard (Little Britain) and Lauren Cooper

(interesting thing, "chav" has the same etymological roots as "chaval", both of which come from Gypsy dialects).
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
Izambri
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1556
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 4:27 pm
Location: Catalonia

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Izambri »

ol bofosh wrote:(interesting thing, "chav" has the same etymological roots as "chaval", both of which come from Gypsy dialects).
And Catalan xaval and xava "boy"; xava is also the name of that Catalan social speech.
Un llapis mai dibuixa sense una mà.

User avatar
L'alphabētarium
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:30 pm

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by L'alphabētarium »

Is the word "chav" used by chavs? Or is it an insult to them?
Is the word an insult to begin with, or simply descriptive of their "chavy" ways?

User avatar
Chagen
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:54 pm

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Chagen »

Route as rawt. Pronouncing <ham> as [h{m] in birmingham makes me cringe. Or leaving the [h] our of herb, herbal, herbalism etc. Ad z[i:]bra. Or thorough with [ow], and how that's also used in adios. And Buddha as booda.

When species becomes speeshees. Schedule as shedule not skedule. I've heard them in British and American accents.
Jesus, what the fuck DO you like, you prescriptivist? Sorry if I'm not one of the Übermenschen for daring to have an American accent.


(also, who fuck doesn't use [budA] and [zibrA]?)
Nūdhrēmnāva naraśva, dṛk śraṣrāsit nūdhrēmanīṣṣ iźdatīyyīm woḥīm madhēyyaṣṣi.
satisfaction-DEF.SG-LOC live.PERFECTIVE-1P.INCL but work-DEF.SG-PRIV satisfaction-DEF.PL.NOM weakeness-DEF.PL-DAT only lead-FUT-3P

User avatar
Rui
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 541
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:14 pm
Location: Beiʒing 拆那

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Rui »

Chagen wrote:(also, who fuck doesn't use [budA] and [zibrA]?)
Pretty much anyone not from the US...not so sure about Buddha, but zebra is pronounced z[E]bra outside of the US.

As for me, I've said it before and I'll say it again: Boston accents. Oh god, Boston accents. Watching The Depaaahted was so painful, despite how good the plot and acting were. So. grating. It's pretty much the only American accent I don't like, though Philadelphia accents aren't exactly pleasant to my ear.

I also kind of don't really like [?]. My dialect of English uses it very sparingly (the only word I can think of right now that has it where it doesn't precede a word-initial vowel is "uh-oh"), and when certain dialects of English turn /t/ into [?] that can sound pretty awful to me as well.

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by ol bofosh »

L'alphabētarium wrote:Is the word "chav" used by chavs? Or is it an insult to them?
Is the word an insult to begin with, or simply descriptive of their "chavy" ways?
I thought it was just describing a certain "fashion" (like punks, goths, hippies, etc., which can be an insult or not), and that's how I use it. Apparently it has "working class" connotations I didn't know about (think it mentions it on Wiki).
Chagen wrote:Jesus, what the fuck DO you like, you prescriptivist?
My accent! :evil: (you'll find my "standard" in my signature, please follow to the letter)

So... you don't dislike any particular phonological features/accents?
Sorry if I'm not one of the Übermenschen for daring to have an American accent.
You are forgiven... for taking me so seriously. :wink: Just some pet hates, quite irrational, I assure you.
(also, who fuck doesn't use [budA] and [zibrA]?)
Mine: ['bʏ.də] and ['zɛ.bɹʷˠə]. ['buː.də] and ['ziː.bɹə] just sound weird to me. (for Buddha, more standard dialects say [ˈbʊ.də])

route [ɹʷˠʏʉtʰ]
birmingham [ˈbœː.mɪŋ.əm]
thorough ['θɐ.ɹʷˠə]

Which probably annoy someone, somewhere.
It was about time I changed this.

User avatar
Vuvuzela
Avisaru
Avisaru
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 1:34 pm

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Vuvuzela »

['bɝ.mɪŋ.m̩]
[ɹʷˠaut]
['θɝ.ɹʷˠou]
(ducks behind chair)

User avatar
L'alphabētarium
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 130
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:30 pm

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by L'alphabētarium »

route [ɹʷuːt]
Birmingham [ˈbɜːmɪŋ.həm*]
thorough ['θʌ.ɹə]

*The [h] is really fainted, but "Birmingham" sounds weird without it. I could be saying [ˈbɜːmɪŋ̊əm] as well...

User avatar
Boşkoventi
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 157
Joined: Mon Aug 14, 2006 4:22 pm
Location: Somewhere north of Dixieland

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by Boşkoventi »

ol bofosh wrote:Route as rawt. Pronouncing <ham> as [h{m] in birmingham makes me cringe. Or leaving the [h] our of herb, herbal, herbalism etc. Ad z[i:]bra. Or thorough with [ow], and how that's also used in adios. And Buddha as booda.

When species becomes speeshees. Schedule as shedule not skedule. I've heard them in British and American accents.
[ˈbɚmɪŋˌhẽə̯m] :mrgreen:

alsoː
[ˈðɚ.oʊ ~ ˈð̞ɚ.oʊ]
[ɚb] etc.
[ˈskɛdʒɫ̩]

How else would you pronounce "adios" in English, other than with /oʊ/? That's the closest sound most of us have to Spanish /o/.
Radius Solis wrote:The scientific method! It works, bitches.
Είναι όλα Ελληνικά για μένα.

User avatar
ol bofosh
Smeric
Smeric
Posts: 1169
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm
Location: tʰæ.ɹʷˠə.ˈgɜʉ̯.nɜ kʰæ.tə.ˈlɜʉ̯.nʲɜ spɛ̝ɪ̯n ˈjʏː.ɹəʔp

Re: Phonological features* you dislike...

Post by ol bofosh »

Boşkoventi wrote: [ˈbɚmɪŋˌhẽə̯m] :mrgreen:
Ah! The pain... XD
Boşkoventi wrote:How else would you pronounce "adios" in English, other than with /oʊ/? That's the closest sound most of us have to Spanish /o/.
If there was no s on the end of that I dipthongise it too in my own accent [əʉ]. Such a bad habit. :wink:
It was about time I changed this.

Post Reply