The Finch has Grammar!
The Finch has Grammar!
Read this. I thought it was at least noteworthy. Scold me if otherwise.
Re: The Finch has Grammar!
Uh, this doesn't give evidence of grammar, it gives evidence of what could debatably called phonology. After all, it sounds like all they were doing was rearranging pitches, and I'm pretty sure animals distinguishing pitch sequences is not revolutionary. The article even uses the word "syllables", which are usually not on the level of syntax (unless the article is claiming that finch-language is limited to monosyllabic morphemes). And there isn't evidence that the finches reactions are indicators of ungrammaticality– in fact, the article says it's triggered by unfamiliarity, and the researchers may just have stumbled upon some meaningful sequence, or perhaps the other versions were similar enough to the original that the birds counted them as the same.
"A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort."
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
–Herm Albright
Even better than a proto-conlang, it's the *kondn̥ǵʰwéh₂s
Re: The Finch has Grammar!
I wonder why they think the birds have grammar just because they react differently to one of the songs. I react differently to different songs in Japanese, for example, even though I don't know the grammar of the language. How is that related to grammar?
Languages I speak fluentlyPřemysl wrote:Oh god, we truly are nerdy. My first instinct was "why didn't he just use sunt and have it all in Latin?".Kereb wrote:they are nerdissimus inter nerdes
English, עברית
Languages I am studying
العربية, 日本語
Conlangs
Athonian
- Salmoneus
- Sanno
- Posts: 3197
- Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2004 5:00 pm
- Location: One of the dark places of the world
Re: The Finch has Grammar!
I've not read the article, but: you respond differently to different songs in Japanese because you know (something about) the grammar of the musical language, even if you don't know any of the grammar of the language of the lyrics.Mr. Z wrote:I wonder why they think the birds have grammar just because they react differently to one of the songs. I react differently to different songs in Japanese, for example, even though I don't know the grammar of the language. How is that related to grammar?
Blog: [url]http://vacuouswastrel.wordpress.com/[/url]
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
But the river tripped on her by and by, lapping
as though her heart was brook: Why, why, why! Weh, O weh
I'se so silly to be flowing but I no canna stay!
Re: The Finch has Grammar!
This article is nuts. Although it's interesting that the birds reacted differently to just one of the remixes, there could be other reasons. Maybe the remix resulting in a bird-language insult.
Does this seem cruel to anyone?
Does this seem cruel to anyone?
He basically gives the birds aphasia, a terrible disorder which would leave them socially isolated.Finally, Abe chemically destroyed an area of the brain called the anterior nidopallium in some birds, and was thereby able to demonstrate that it is vital for registering faulty grammar. In humans, a region called Broca's area is activated when we hear ungrammatical sentences, so Abe suggests that studying the counterpart region in finches might throw new light on the origins of human grammar.
- Zumir
- Lebom
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 9:22 pm
- Location: On ur internets, spamming ur threads
Re: The Finch has Grammar!
I disagree. He might have prevented the bird from mating, but since bird-song isn't actually a language, the bird wouldn't suffer from what makes the disease horrible in the first place.
Anyway, welcome to the board lalamans! Have some pickles and tea.
Anyway, welcome to the board lalamans! Have some pickles and tea.
Zim ho Xsárnicja žovnyce.
Re: The Finch has Grammar!
It may only demonstrate that syntax has some sort of meaning in their songs.