Phonological Aha Erlebnis

Discussion of natural languages, or language in general.
Post Reply
User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Phonological Aha Erlebnis

Post by jal »

I had been wondering a long time ago when I still somewhat studied Polish, why the <y> was described as a /ɨ/, since to me it was clearly a [ɪ]. Today, when thinking about it (for the first time in a few years, I guess, dunno why it came up), I checked the IPA vowel charts found on Wikipedia, and lo and behold: they are actually the same! Stupid phoneticians, can't even agree on how to portray a sound in different languages. Sigh...
Attachments
vowels.png
vowels.png (11.82 KiB) Viewed 1310 times

User avatar
finlay
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 3600
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:35 pm
Location: Tokyo

Re: Phonological Aha Erlebnis

Post by finlay »

Well, it's not as simple as that. The circled position is neither IPA [ɪ] nor [ɨ], in the most technical sense (it's actually closer to [ɘ] than either of those two). The IPA vowel positions and cardinal vowels are prototypes, ideals. No language actually uses them – certainly not consistently, at least. Even describing them as points on the vowel chart is a bit of a simplification, as in reality the things vary across a sort of range of the vowel chart.

also what are you comparing there, dutch and polish?

Anyway, a lot of this is a tradition or convention, and the work is generally done by different phoneticians.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Phonological Aha Erlebnis

Post by jal »

finlay wrote:The circled position is neither IPA [ɪ] nor [ɨ]
Yeah, that's probably the cause of the incosistent naming. Perhaps Germanic is traditionally said to have [ɪ], and Slavonic [ɨ], ot something.
also what are you comparing there, dutch and polish?
Yeah, Dutch = mostly red, Polish = black.


JAL

spats
Lebom
Lebom
Posts: 129
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 10:43 pm
Location: Virginia, U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Phonological Aha Erlebnis

Post by spats »

Yeah, that's [ɘ]. But nobody ever lists their vowel phonology as /i e ɘ a o u/, just like nobody writes /i ɛ ɑ ɔ u/ for a five-vowel sysetm, even if those are closer to the actual realizations than /i e a o u/. Similarly, the sixth vowel in a gapless six-vowel system is almost always written as /ə/, /ɨ/, or /y/, regardless of its actual realization.

Regarding the Dutch phonology you give, a lot of Germanic varieties (including many regional Englishes) have a centralized or backed /ɪ/. It's not an uncommon shift.

User avatar
Nortaneous
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 4544
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 1:52 am
Location: the Imperial Corridor

Re: Phonological Aha Erlebnis

Post by Nortaneous »

jal wrote:
finlay wrote:The circled position is neither IPA [ɪ] nor [ɨ]
Yeah, that's probably the cause of the incosistent naming. Perhaps Germanic is traditionally said to have [ɪ], and Slavonic [ɨ], ot something.
yep, although Ukrainian is the exception for some reason. maybe because it uses a character normally used for /i/ to write its /ɪ/?
Siöö jandeng raiglin zåbei tandiüłåd;
nää džunnfin kukuch vklaivei sivei tåd.
Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei. Chei.

User avatar
jal
Sumerul
Sumerul
Posts: 2633
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:03 am
Location: Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Phonological Aha Erlebnis

Post by jal »

Nortaneous wrote:yep, although Ukrainian is the exception for some reason. maybe because it uses a character normally used for /i/ to write its /ɪ/?
wikipedia wrote:/ɪ/ may be classified as retracted high-mid front vowel or lowered retracted high front vowel
Also, it apparently uses <и> for /ɪ/, and <i> for /i/ (as opposed to Russian, that uses <и> for /i/, and has [ɨ] only as an allophone.


JAL

Post Reply